Competition policy implementation in transition economies: An empirical assessment

European Economic Review

Volumn 44, Issue 4-6, 2000, Pages 762-772

  Dutz, Mark A ^a,b   Vagliasindi, Maria ^a  

^a EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT   (United Kingdom)

^b WORLD BANK   (United States)

Author keywords

Competition; Competition policy; Transition economies

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION POLICY; INDUSTRIAL POLICY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; TRANSITIONAL ECONOMY;

EID: 0034124468     PISSN: 00142921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2921(99)00060-4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Blundell R., Griffiths R., Van Reenen J. Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. Economic Journal. 105:1995;333-344.
2. Caves R. Industrial organization and new findings on the turnover and mobility of firms. Journal of Economic Literature. 36:1998;1947-1982.
3. Dutz, M.A., Hayri, A., 1999. Does more intense competition lead to higher growth? Discussion Paper No. 2249. CEPR, London.
4. Dutz, M.A., Vagliasindi, M., 1999a. Insider-outsider ownership and restructuring in transition economies: Cross-country evidence. Mimeo., EBRD, London.
5. Dutz, M.A., Vagliasindi, M., 1999b. Market selection, regulatory barriers and competition: Evidence from transition economies. Mimeo., EBRD, London.
6. Dutz, M.A., Vagliasindi, M., 1999c. Rules versus implementation: Determinants of competition policy effectiveness in transition economies. Mimeo., EBRD, London.
7. Fingleton, J., Fox, E., Neven, D., Seabright, P., 1996. Competition policy and the transformation of Central Europe. CEPR, London.
8. Nickell, S., Nicolitsas D., Dryden, N., 1997. What makes firms perform well? European Economic Review 41, 783-796.