Growth analysis of four Amaranthus species

Weed Science

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 347-355

  Horak, Michael J ^a,b   Loughin, Thomas M ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Monsanato Company   (United States)

Author keywords

Growth analysis; Pigweed; Relative growth rate

Indexed keywords

GROWTH; HEIGHT; HERBICIDE; WEED;

AMARANTHUS; AMARANTHUS ALBUS; AMARANTHUS PALMERI; AMARANTHUS RETROFLEXUS; AMARANTHUS RUDIS;

EID: 0034124243     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0347:GAOFAS]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bensch, C. N. and M. J. Horak. 1997. Competition of three Amaranthus species in soybean. Page 148 in Proceedings of the North Central Weed Science Society, Vol. 52. Champaign, IL: North Central Weed Science Society.
2. [GPFA] Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Pages 179-184 in Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
3. Holt, J. S. and D. R. Orcutt. 1991. Functional relationships of growth and competitiveness in perennial weeds and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 39:575-584.
4. Horak, M. J. 2000. Biology and management of Palmer amaranth: The new weed on the block. Page 21 in Proceedings of the Illinois Crop Protection Technology Conference. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
5. Horak, M. J. and D. E. Peterson. 1995. Biotypes of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) are resistant to imazethapyr and thifensulfuron. Weed Technol. 9:192-195.
6. Horak, M. J., D. E. Peterson, D. J. Chessman, and L. M. Wax. 1994. Pigweed identification: A pictorial guide to the common pigweeds of the Great Plains. Publication S80. Manhattan, KS: Kansas Cooperative Extension Service, 12 p.
7. Klingaman, T. E. and L. R. Oliver. 1994. Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 42:523-527.
8. Knezevic, S. Z., M. J. Horak, and R. L. Vanderlip. 1997. Relative time of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) emergence is critical in pigweed-sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] competition. Weed Sci. 45:502-508.
9. Knezevic, S. Z., M. J. Horak, and R. L. Vanderlip. 1999. Estimates of physiological determinants for redroot pigweed. Weed Sci. 47:291-296.
10. Kropff, M. J. and H. H. van Laar. 1993. Modelling crop-weed interactions. Wallingford, U.K.: CAB International and Manila, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute. 274 p.
11. Mayo C. M., M. J. Horak, D. E. Peterson, and J. E. Boyer. 1995. Differential control of four Amaranthus species by six postemergence herbicides in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 9:141-147.
12. Radosevich, S., J. S. Holt, and C. Ghersa. 1997. Pages 278-301 in Weed Ecology: Implications for Vegetation Management. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
13. Rushing, D. W., S. W. Murray, and L. M. Verhalen. 1985. Weed interference with cotton (Gossypium birsutum). II. Tumble pigweed (Amaranthus albus). Weed Sci. 33:815-818.
14. Russelle, M. P., W. W. Wilhelm, R. A. Olson, and J. F. Power. 1984. Growth analysis based on degree days. Crop Sci. 24:28-32.
15. [SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1997. SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements through Release 6.12. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.
16. Sauer, J. 1957. Recent migration and evolution of the dioecious amaranths. Evolution 11:11-31.
17. Sweat, J. K., M. J. Horak, D. E. Peterson, R. W. Lloyd and J. E. Boyer. 1998. Herbicide efficacy on four Amaranthus species in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 12:315-321.
18. Wax, L. M. 1995. Pigweeds of the Midwest: distribution, importance and management. Pages 239-242 in Proceedings of the Integrated Crop Management Conference, Vol. 7. Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
19. Webster, T. M. and H. D. Coble. 1997. Changes in the weed species composition of the Southern United States: 1974-1995. Weed Technol. 11:308-317.