The role of personality pathology in the aetiology and treatment of substance use disorders

Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 163-169

  Verheul, Roel ^a,b   Van Den Brink, Wim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b AMSTERDAM INSTITUTE FOR ADDICTION RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; PERSONALITY DISORDER; REVIEW; SUBSTANCE ABUSE;

EID: 0034124089     PISSN: 09517367     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001504-200003000-00005     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. 1 Sutker PB, Allain AN. Issues in personality conceptualizations of addictive behaviors. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988; 56:172-182.
2. 2 Lindström L. Managing alcoholism: matching clients to treatments. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992.
3. 3 Verheul R, Ball SA, van den Brink W. Substance abuse and personality disorders, in dual diagnosis and treatment: substance abuse and comorbid medical and psychiatric disorders. In: Kranzler HR, Rounsaville BJ (editors). New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1997. pp. 317-363.
4. 4 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 1st ed, 2nd ed, 3rd ed, 3rd revised ed, 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1952, 1968, 1980, 1987, 1994.
5. 5 Barnes GE. The alcoholic personality: a reanalysis of the literature. J Stud Alcohol 1979; 40:571-634.
6. 6 Zuckerman M. Vulnerability to psychopathology: a biosocial model. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999. pp. 255-317. An impressive and valuable book that synthesizes the complex and voluminous literature on psychopathology from a behavioural and neurobiological point of view. The chapter on addiction is certainly worth reading.
7. 7 Tarter RE, Vanyukov MM. Alcoholism: a developmental disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994; 62:189-196.
8. 8 Cloninger CR. Neurogenetic adaptive mechanisms in alcoholism. Science 1997; 236:410-436.
9. 9 Verheul R, van den Brink W, Hartgers C. Prevalence of personality disorders among alcoholics and drug addicts: an overview. Eur Addict Res 1995; 1:166-177.
10. 10 Rounsaville BJ, Kranzler HR, Ball SA, Tennen H, Poling J, Triffleman E. Personality disorders in substance abusers: relation to substance use. J Nerv Ment Dis 1998; 186:87-95. Although DSM-IV guidelines currently recommend excluding Axis II symptoms that are accounted for by an Axis I disorder, the majority of studies ignore this recommendation. This study is the first both to attempt to distinguish between personality disorder symptoms that are independent versus substance-related as well as to compare independent and substance-related diagnoses with respect to reliability and clinical correlates. Importantly, the findings do not clearly support the validity of this exclusion strategy, thereby raising questions about the validity or feasibility of the recommendations in DSM-IV.
11. 11 Brooner RK, King VL, Kidorf M, Schmidt CW, Bigelow GE. Psychiatric and substance use comorbidity among treatment-seeking opioid abusers. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997; 54:71-80.
12. 12 Morgenstern J, Langenbucher J, Labouvie E, Miller KJ. The comorbidity of alcoholism and personality disorders in a clinical population: prevalence rates and relation to alcohol typology variables. J Abnorm Psychol 1997; 106:74-84.
13. 13 Driessen M, Veltrup C, Wetterling T, John U, Dilling H. Axis I and Axis II comorbidity in alcohol dependence and the two types of alcoholism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1998; 22:77-86.
14. 14 Verheul R, Hartgers C, van den Brink W, Koeter MWJ. The effect of sampling, diagnostic criteria and assessment procedures on the observed prevalence of personality disorders in alcoholics. J Stud Alcohol 1998; 59:227-236. Observed Axis II prevalence rates typically vary across different studies. This study is the first to explore, within a single study population, whether and to what extent sampling characteristics, diagnostic criteria and assessment procedures account for this variability. This report helps to interpret the findings of prevalence studies in general more effectively.
15. 15 Kokkevi A, Stefanis N, Anastasopoulou E, Kostogianni C. Personality disorders in drug abusers: prevalence and their association with Axis I disorders as predictors of treatment retention. Addict Behav 1998; 23:841-853.
16. 16 DeJong CAJ, Brink W van den, Harteveld FM, Wielen GM van der. Personality disorders in alcoholics and drug addicts. Compr Psychiatry 1993; 34:87-94.
17. 17 Skodol AE, Oldham JM, Gallaher PE. Axis II comorbidity of substance use disorders among patients referred for treatment of personality disorders. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156:733-738.
18. 18 Bernstein DP, Stein JA, Handelsman L. Predicting personality pathology among adult patients with substance use disorders: effects of childhood maltreatment. Addict Behav 1998; 23:855-868. This study examines the associations between personality disorders and different types of childhood maltreatment in 378 adult substance abusers. The methodology (path analysis) is innovative. The results indicate that childhood emotional abuse predicts later personality disorders, except for antisocial personality disorder (differentially predicted by physical abuse and physical neglect) and schizoid personality disorder (differentially predicted by emotional neglect).
19. 19 Verheul R, Kranzler HR, Poling J, Tennen H, Ball SA, Rounsaville BJ. Axis I and Axis II disorders in substance abusers: fact or artifact? J Stud Alcohol, 2000; 61:101-110.
20. 20 Nace EP. Substance abuse and personality disorder. J Chem Depend Treatment 1990; :183-197.
21. 21 Zimmerman M, Coryell W. DSM-III personality disorder diagnoses in a nonpatient sample: demographic correlates and comorbidity. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989; 46:682-689.
22. 22 Masse LC, Tremblay RE. Behaviour of boys in kindergarten and the onset of substance use during adolescence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997; 54:62-68.
23. 23 Cloninger CR, Sigvardsson S, Bohman M. Childhood personality predicts alcohol abuse in young adults. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1988; 12:494-505.
24. 24 Caspi A, Begg D, Dickson N, Harrington H, Langley J, Moffit TE, Silva PA. Personality differences predict health-risk behaviours in young adulthood: evidence from a longitudinal study. J Person Soc Psychol 1997; 73:1052-1063.
25. 25 Krueger RF, Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Silva PA, McGee R. Personality traits are differentially linked to mental disorders: a multitrait-multidiagnosis study of an adolescent birth cohort. J Abnorm Psychol 1996; 105:299-312.
26. 26 Sher KJ, Trull TJ. Personality and disinhibitory psychopathology: alcoholism and antisocial personality disorder. J Abnorm Psychol 1994; 103:92-102.
27. 27 Wills TA, Windle M, Cleary SD. Temperament and novelty seeking in adolescent substance use: convergence of dimensions of temperament with constructs from Cloninger's theory. J Person Soc Psychol 1998; 74:387-406.
28. 28 Merikangas KR, Stevens DE, Fenton B, Stolar M, O'Malley SS, Woods SW, Risch N. Co-morbidity and familial aggregation of alcoholism and anxiety disorders. Psychol Med 1998; 28:773-788.
29. 29 Merikangas KR, Mehta RL, Molnar BE, Walters EE, Swendsen JD, Aguilar-Gaziola S, et al. Comorbidity of substance use disorders with mood and anxiety disorders: results of the international consortium in psychiatric epidemiology. Addict Behav 1998; 23:893-907. This outstanding study among a very large sample recruited from the general population in several countries contributes substantially to knowledge about the co-morbidity of substance use disorders and anxiety/mood disorders as well as patterns in the order of onset of the respective disorders.
30. 30 Kushner MG, Sher KJ, Beitman BD. The relation between alcohol problems and the anxiety disorders. Am J Psychiatry 1990; 147:685-695.
31. 31 Schuckit MA, Hesselbrock V. Alcohol dependence and anxiety disorders: what is the relationship? Am J Psychiatry 1994; 151:1723-1734.
32. 32 Conrod PJ, Pihl RO, Vassileva J. Differential sensitivity to alcohol reinforcement in groups of men at risk for distinct alcoholism subtypes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1998; 22:585-597. This experimental study really contributes to an understanding of the psychophysiological mechanisms underlying addictive behaviours as well as the clinical heterogeneity in this respect. The same research group has produced several intriguing papers.
33. 33 Schuckit MA, Klein J, Twitchell G, Smith T. Personality test scores as predictors of alcoholism almost a decade later. Am J Psychiatry 1994; 151:1038-1042.
34. 34 Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The neural basis of craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev 1993; 18:247-291.
35. 35 Verheul R, Brink W van den, Geerlings PJ. A three-pathway psychobiological model of craving for alcohol. Alcohol Alcohol 1999; 34:197-222. In this article, by reviewing the psychological, psychophysiological, neurobiological, and psychopharmacological literature on the craving for alcohol, it is argued that converging evidence from several disciplines suggests a three-pathway biobehavioural model of craving. This up-to-date, innovative and comprehensive review provides a heuristic framework that might stimulate further human and animal experimental research by generating clear hypotheses with respect to the relationship between personality traits (or behavioural tendencies in animals) and dysregulations in several distinct neural circuitries or neurotransmitter systems on the one hand, and physiological and subjective cue reactivity (craving) and responses to anti-craving agents on the other hand.
36. 36 McGue M, Slutske W, Iacono WG. Personality and substance use disorders: II. Alcoholism versus drug use disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol 1999; 67:394-404. This well designed study found that, when drug abuse is statistically controlled, personality differences between alcoholic and non-alcoholic individuals are primarily on measures of negative emotionality, whereas if one controls for alcoholism, personality differences between individuals with and without a drug use disorder arise primarily on measures of constraint. This original work contributes to an understanding of the personality dimensions that are specifically associated with different psychoactive substances.
37. 37 Siever LJ, Davis KL. A psychobiological perspective on the personality disorders. Am J Psychiatry 1991; 148:1647-1658.
38. 38 Depue RA, Luciana M, Arbisi P, Collins P, Leon A. Dopamine and the structure of personality: relation of agonist-induced dopamine activity to positive emotionality. J Person Soc Psychol 1994; 67:485-498.
39. 39 Strand JG, Benjamin LS. Resistance to change in individuals with personality disorder. Curr Opin Psychiatry 1997; 10:132-135.
40. 40 Reich JH, Vasile RG. Effect of personality disorders on the treatment outcome of Axis I conditions: an update. J Nerv Ment Dis 1993; 181:475-484.
41. 41 Cacciola JS, Alterman AI, Rutherford MJ, Snider EC. Treatment response of antisocial substance abusers. J Nerv Ment Dis 1995; 183:166-171.
42. 42 Cacciola JS, Alterman AI, Rutherford MJ, Alterman AI, McKay JR, Snider EC. Personality disorders and treatment outcome in methadone maintenance patients. J Nerv Ment Dis 1996; 184:234-239.
43. 43 Cecero JJ, Ball SA, Tennen H, Kranzler HR, Rounsaville BJ. Concurrent and predictive validity of antisocial personality disorder subtyping among substance abusers. J Nerv Ment Dis 1999; 187:478-486. This well conducted and nicely documented study provides new empirical data that suggest once more that substance abusers with co-morbid personality pathology benefit from treatment at least as much as those without.
44. 44 Crits-Cristoph P, Siqueland L, Blaine J, Frank A, Luborsky L, Onken LS, et al. Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence: NIDA collaborative cocaine treatment study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999; 56:493-502. A landmark investigation of the efficacy of different (combinations of) psychosocial treatments of cocaine dependence. This rigorously designed study with state-of-the-art methodology might lack external validity because only a small proportion of the eligible sample was actually evaluated.
45. 45 Alterman AI, Rutherford MJ, Cacciola JS, McKay JR, Boardman CR. Prediction of 7 months methadone maintenance treatment response by four measures of antisociality. Drug Alcohol Depend 1998; 49:217-223.
46. 46 Powell BJ, Penick EC, Nickel EJ, Liskow BI, Riesenmy KD, Campion SL, Brown EF. Outcomes of comorbid alcoholic men: a 1-year follow-up. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1992; 16:131-138.
47. 47 Verheul R, van den Brink W, Hartgers C, Koeter MWJ. Antisocial alcoholic patients show as much improvement at 14-month follow-up as non-antisocial alcoholic patients. Am J Addict 1999; 8:24-33.
48. 48 Verheul R, van den Brink W, Hartgers C. Personality disorders predict relapse in alcoholic patients. Addict Behav 1998; 23:869-682. In addition to examining the impact of personality pathology on relapse after discharge from treatment, this study investigates time-in-programme, motivation for change, and working alliance as potential moderators or mediators of the relationship between Axis II and relapse in a sample of 187 alcoholics. This study illustrates the value of taking into account treatment process variables underlying treatment outcomes.
49. 49 Marlowe DB, Kirby KC, Festinger DS, Husband SD, Platt JJ. Impact of comorbid personality disorders and personality disorders symptoms on outcomes of behavioral treatment for cocaine dependence. J Nerv Ment Dis 1997; 185:483-490.
50. 50 Thomas VH, Melchert TP, Banken JA. Substance dependence and personality disorders: comorbidity and treatment outcome in an inpatient treatment population. J Stud Alcohol 1999; 60:271-277.
51. 51 Sellman JD, Mulder RT, Sullivan PF, Joyce PR. Low persistence predicts relapse in alcohol dependence following treatment. J Stud Alcohol 1997; 58:257-263.
52. 52 Cannon DS, Keefe CK, Clark LA. Persistence predicts latency to relapse following inpatient treatment for alcohol dependence. Addict Behav 1997; 22:535-543.
53. 53 Fisher LA, Elias JW, Ritz K. Predicting relapse to substance abuse as a function of personality dimensions. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1998; 22:1041-1047. This study provides new empirical data regarding the predictive validity of normal personality dimensions. It is shown that relapse in patients who have completed treatment can be predicted by their scores on measures of low constraint and high neuroticism. An important contribution to the field.
54. 54 Gerstley LJ, McLellan AT, Alterman AI, Woody GE, Luborsky L, Prout M. Ability to form an alliance with the therapist: a possible marker of prognosis for patients with antisocial personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1989; 146:508-512.
55. 55 Project Match Research Group. Project MATCH secondary a priori hypotheses. Addiction 1998; 92:1671-1698. This study reports on empirical data from the largest and most rigorously designed matching study ever conducted. Three protocollized psychosocial treatments (cognitive-behavioural coping skills training, motivation enhancement therapy, and 12-step facilitation) are compared and 10 different matching variables (among which sociopathy as a personality variable) are examined. The finding that outpatients high on psychiatric severity benefit more from 12-step facilitation than from cognitive-behavioural training is the only robust matching effect reported.
56. 56 Project Match Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: project match posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Stud Alcohol 1997; 58:7-29.
57. 57 Penick EC, Powell BJ, Campbell J, Liskow BI, Nickel EJ, Dale TM, et al. Pharmacological treatment for antisocial personality disorder alcoholics: a preliminary study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1996; 20:477-484.
58. 58 Longabaugh R, Rubin A, Malloy P, Beattie M, Clifford PR, Noel N. Drinking outcomes of alcohol abusers diagnosed as antisocial personality disorder. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1994; 18:778-785.
59. 59 Kadden RM, Cooney NL, Getter H, Litt MD. Matching alcoholics to coping skills or interactional therapies: posttreatment results. J Consult Clin Psychol 1989; 57:698-704.
60. 60 Linehan MM. Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: The Guilford Press; 1993.
61. 61 Ball SA. Manualized treatment for substance abusers with personality disorders: dual focus schema therapy. Addict Behav 1998; 23:883-891. This paper introduces and describes an innovative treatment approach, i.e. dual focus schema therapy, which might be indicated for those substance abusers with Axis II co-morbidity who do not respond to a brief intervention.