The effect of education programs on paratransit demand of people with disabilities

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 261-285

  Fitzgerald, James ^a   Shaunesey, Donna ^a   Stern, Steven ^b  

^a 104 Keystone Place   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Disability; Econometric methods; Transportation

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EDUCATION; HANDICAPPED PERSONS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

ECONOMETRY;

TRANSPORTATION;

DISABILITY; EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRAVEL DEMAND;

EID: 0034122914     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00014-2     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Bearse, P., Gurmu, S., Rappaport, C., Stern, S., 1998. Paratransit Demand of Disabled People. Unpublished manuscript.
2. Berndt E., Hall B., Hall R., Hausman J. Estimation and inference in nonlinear statistical models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement. 3(4):1974;653-666.
3. Everett, C., 1985. A comparison of five exemplary transportation services for the disabled. Urban Institute Project Report. Washington, DC.
4. Fix, M., 1985. The evolution of transportation programs for the disabled in three Pennsylvania cities. Urban Institute Project Report. Washington, DC.
5. Hausman J., Hall B., Griliches Z. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents - R and D relationship. Econometrica. 52(4):1984;909-938.
6. JAUNT, 1996. Operating Statistics for Urban Complementary Paratransit in Virginia. Internal document, October.
7. Stern, S., 1993. A disaggregate discrete choice model of transportation demand by elderly and disabled people in rural Virginia. Transportation Research.