Aid fungibility in Assessing Aid: Red herring or true concern?

Journal of International Development

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 413-428

  Mcgillivray, Mark ^a   Morrissey, Oliver ^b  

^a RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; DEVELOPMENT AID; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT;

CLUPEIDAE;

EID: 0034122704     PISSN: 09541748     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(200004)12:3<413::AID-JID659>3.0.CO;2-P     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Ahmed A. 1998. Aid and fiscal behaviour in developing Asia. Development, Governance and Environment in South Asia: Special Focus on Bangladesh, Alauddin M, Hossan S (eds). Macmillan: London.
2. Barnett R. 1993. Preference revelation and public goods. Current Issues in Public Sector Economics, Jackson P (ed.). Macmillan: London; 94-131.
3. Cashel-Cordo P, Craig S. 1990. The public sector impact of international resource transfers. Journal of Development Economics 32: 17-42.
4. Cullis J, Jones P, Morrissey O. 1991. Public choice perspectives on the poll tax. Economic Journal 101: 600-614.
5. Dollery B, Worthington A. 1996. The empirical analysis of fiscal illusion. Journal of Economic Surveys 10: 261-297.
6. Feyzioglu T, Swaroop V, Zhu M. 1998. A panel data analysis of the fungibility of foreign aid. World Bank Economic Review 12: 29-58.
7. Franco-Rodriguez S. 2000. Recent developments in fiscal response, with an application to Costa Rica. Journal of International Development this issue.
8. Franco-Rodriguez S, McGillivray M, Morrissey O. 1998. Aid and the public sector in Pakistan: evidence with endogenous aid. World Development 26: 1241-50.
9. Gang I, Khan H. 1991. Foreign aid, taxes and public investment. Journal of Development Economics 24: 355-369.
10. Gemmell N, Morrissey O, Pinar A. 1998. Fiscal illusion and the demand for local government expenditures in England and Wales. University of Nottingham: Discussion Papers in Economics No. 98/19.
11. Hansen H, Tarp F. 2000. Aid effectiveness disputed. Journal of International Development this issue.
12. Heller PS. 1975. A model of public fiscal behaviour in developing countries: aid, investment and taxation. American Economic Review 65: 429-445.
13. Iqbal Z. 1997. Foreign aid and the public sector: a model of fiscal behaviour in Pakistan. Pakistan Development Review 36: 115-129.
14. Khan H, Hoshino E. 1992. Impact of foreign aid on the fiscal behaviour of LDC governments. World Development 20: 1481-1488.
15. Lensink R, Morrissey O. 2000. Aid instability as a measure of uncertainty and the positive impact of aid on growth. Journal of Development Studies forthcoming.
16. Lin S. 1994. Government spending and growth. Applied Economics 26: 83-94.
17. Maxwell S. 1996. Catch the tiger by its tail: counterpart funds in the evaluation of programme aid. Evaluating Programme Aid: Volume I, Conceptual Issues, White H (ed.). ISS: The Hague; 57-78.
18. Maxwell S, Owens T. 1991. The Developmental Uses of Counterpart Funds. IDS, Report to Commission of the European Communities: Sussex.
19. McGillivray M, Ahmed A. 1999. Aid, adjustment and public sector fiscal behaviour in the Philippines. Journal of the Asia-Pacific Economy 4: 381-391.
20. Morrissey O. 1999. Political dimensions of economic policy reform. Evaluating Economic Liberalisation, McGillivray M, Morrissey O (eds). Macmillan: London; 83-102.
21. Pack H, Pack J. 1990. Is foreign aid fungible? The case of Indonesia. Economic Journal 100: 188-194.
22. Pack H, Pack J. 1993. Foreign aid and the question of fungibility. Review of Economics and Statistics 75: 258-265.
23. Pack H, Pack J. 1996. Foreign aid and fiscal stress, (mimeo) (U. Pennsylvania).
24. White H, Morrissey O. 1997. Conditionality when donor and recipient preferences vary. Journal of International Development 9: 497-505.
25. World Bank. 1998. Assessing Aid: What Works, What Doesn't, and Why. Oxford University Press for the World Bank: Washington DC.