A new concept in Euler deconvolution of isolated gravity anomalies

Geophysical Prospecting

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 559-575

  Roy, L ^a   Agarwal, B N P ^a   Shaw, R K ^a  

^a INDIAN SCHOOL OF MINES   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ESTIMATION; LINEAR EQUATIONS; MAGNETIC PROSPECTING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION;

EULER DECONVOLUTION; GRAVITY ANOMALY; STRUCTURAL INDEX;

GRAVITATIONAL PROSPECTING;

DATA INTERPRETATION; DECONVOLUTION; EULERIAN MODEL; GRAVITY ANOMALY;

EID: 0034121225     PISSN: 00168025     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.2000.00203.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abdelrahman E.M. and Sharafeldin S.M. 1995a. A least-squares minimization approach to shape determination from gravity data. Geophysics 60, 589-590.
2. Abdelrahman E.M. and Sharafeldin S.M. 1995b. A least-squares minimization approach to depth determination from numerical horizontal gravity gradients. Geophysics 60, 1259-1260.
3. Barbosa V.C.F., Silva J.B.C. and Medeiros W.E. 1999. Stability analysis and improvement of structural index estimation in Euler deconvolution. Geophysics 64, 48-60.
4. Barongo J. 1984. Euler's differential equation and the interpretation of the magnetic point-pole and point-dipole source. Geophysics 49, 1549-1553.
5. Cassano E. and Rocca F. 1975. Interpretation of magnetic anomalies using spectral estimation techniques. Geophysical Prospecting 23, 663-681.
6. Claerbout J.F. 1976. Fundamentals of Geophysical Data Processing. Kingsport Press.
7. Dobrin M.B. 1984. Introduction to Geophysical Prospecting. McGraw-Hill Book Co.
8. Fairhead J.D., Bennett K.J., Gordon D.R.H. and Huang D. 1994. Euler: beyond the 'black box', 64th SEG meeting, Los Angeles, USA, Extended Abstracts, 422-424.
9. Golub G. 1965. Numerical methods for solving linear least-squares problems. Numerische Mathematik 7, 206-216.
10. Granser H. 1987. Non-linear inversion of gravity data using the Schmidt-Lichtenstein approach. Geophysics 52, 88-93.
11. Grant F.S. and West G.F. 1965. Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics. McGraw-Hill Book Co.
12. Gupta O.P. 1983. A least-squares approach to depth determination from gravity data. Geophysics 48, 357-360.
13. Hood P. 1965. Gradient measurements in aeromagnetic surveying. Geophysics 30, 891-902.
14. Keating PB. 1998. Weighted Euler deconvolution of gravity data. Geophysics 63, 1595-1603.
15. Klingele E.E., Marson I. and Kahle H.G. 1991. Automatic interpretation of gravity gradiometric data in two dimensions: vertical gradient. Geophysics 39, 407-434.
16. Marson I. and Klingele E.E. 1993. Advantages of using the vertical gradient of gravity for 3-D interpretation. Geophysics 58, 1588-1595.
17. Nandi B.K., Shaw R.K. and Agarwal B.N.P 1997. Identification of the shape of simple causative sources from gravity data. Geophysical Prospecting 45, 513-520.
18. Nettleton L.L. 1976. Gravity and Magnetics in Oil Prospecting. McGraw-Hill Book Co.
19. Odegard M.E. and Berg J.W. 1965. Gravity interpretation using the Fourier integral. Geophysics 30, 424-438.
20. Rao B.S.R. and Murthy I.V.R. 1978. Gravity and Magnetic Methods of Geophysical Data Processing. Arnold-Heinemann Publishers, India.
21. Reid A.B., Allsop J.M., Granser H., Millett A.J. and Somerton LW. 1990. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics 55, 80-91.
22. Roy A. 1962. Ambiguity in geophysical interpretation. Geophysics 27, 90-99.
23. Roy L., Agarwal B.N.P. and Shaw R.K. 1999. Estimation of shape factor and depth from gravity anomalies due to some simple sources. Geophysical Prospecting 47, 41-58.
24. Skeels D.C. 1947. Ambiguity in gravity interpretation. Geophysics 12, 43-56.
25. Slack H.A., Lynch V.M. and Lagan L. 1967. The geomagnetic gradiometer. Geophysics 32, 872-877.
26. Smith R.A. 1959. Some depth formulae for local magnetic and gravity anomalies. Geophysical Prospecting 7, 55-63.
27. Stavrev P.Y. 1997. Euler deconvolution using differential similarily transforms of gravity or magnetic anomalies. Geophysical Prospecting 45, 207-246.
28. Talwani M., Worzel J. and Landisman M. 1959. Rapid gravity computations for two dimensional bodies with application to the Mendocino submarine fracture zones. Journal of Geophysical Research 64, 44-49.
29. Thompson D.T. 1982. EUILDPH: a new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics 47, 31-37.