Measuring the costs and benefits of heart disease monitoring

Heart

Volumn 83, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 651-656

  Perry, A ^a   Smith, W C S ^g   Capewell, S ^b   Walker, A ^c   Chalmers, J ^d   Redpath, A ^d   Major, K ^f   Morrison, C E ^c   Craig, N ^a   Cobbe, S ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c NHS GREATER GLASGOW AND CLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^d Information and Statistics Division   (United Kingdom)

^e GLASGOW ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^f NHS AYRSHIRE AND ARRAN   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Heart disease; Monitoring; Option appraisal; Surveillance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST OF ILLNESS; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH SURVEY; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MORTALITY; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK FACTOR;

EID: 0034118801     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/heart.83.6.651     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Tunstall-Pedoe H. Monitoring coronary heart disease in the community: why and how? In: Marmot M, Elliott P, eds. Coronary heart disease epidemiology: from aetiology to public health. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, 1992.
2. Fulton M. Monitoring coronary heart disease in Scotland. Edinburgh: Health Monitoring Group, Scottish Office Home and Health Department, 1991.
3. Fulton M. Home and Health Department policy review of coronary heart disease: questions posed. Edinburgh: Scottish Office Home and Health Department, 1993.
4. Bennett S, Dobson A, Magnus P. Outline of a national monitoring system for cardiovascular disease. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 1995.
5. Public Health Policy Unit Policy Review Group. Coronary heart disease in Scotland: report of a policy review. Edinburgh: HMSO, 1996.
6. Puska P, Tuomilehto J, Nissinen A, et al, eds. The North Karelia project: 20 year results and experiences. Helsinki: The National Public Health Institute, 1995.
7. Feinleib M, Breslow NE, Detels R. Cohort studies. In: Detels R, Holland WW, McEwen J, et al, eds. Oxford textbook of public health. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
8. Dawber TR, Kannel WB, Lyell LP. An approach to longitudinal studies in a community: the Framingham study. Ann NY Acad Sci 1963;107:539-56.
9. Farquhar JW, Fortmann SP, Maccoby N, et al. The Stanford five-city project: design and methods. Am J Epidemiol 1985;122:323-34.
10. Murray DM. Design and analysis of community trials: lessons from the Minnesota heart health program. Am J Epidemiol 1995;142:569-74.
11. Carleton RA, Lasater TM, Assaf A, et al. The Pawtucket heart health program: I. An experiment in population-based disease prevention. Rhode Island Med J 1987;70:533-8.
12. Donaldson L. Registering a need. BMJ 1992;305:597-8.
13. Breen D. Setting priorities: a framework for the assessment of health care priorities in Scottish Health Boards. Health Bull 1991;49:34-9.
14. Lock C. What value do computers provide to NHS hospitals? BMJ 1996;312:1407-10.
15. Henderson J. Appraising options. SOAP 2. HERU Series of option appraisal papers. Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen, 1984.
16. HM Treasury. Investment appraisal in the public sector. London: HMSO, 1982.
17. Briggs A, Sculpher M, Buxton M. Uncertainty in the economic evaluation of health care technologies: the role of sensitivity analysis. Health Econ 1994;3:95-104.