Getting it right: The trial of sexual assault and child molestation cases under Federal Rules of Evidence 413-415

Behavioral Sciences and the Law

Volumn 18, Issue 2-3, 2000, Pages 169-216

  Eads, Linda S ^a   Shuman, Daniel W ^a,b   DeLipsey, Jan Marie ^b  

^a SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Psychologist   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; CHARACTER DISORDER; CHILD ABUSE; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LAW; PROBABILITY; SEXUAL CRIME;

EID: 0034118490     PISSN: 07353936     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1099-0798(200003/06)18:2/3<169::aid-bsl397>3.0.co;2-x     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Daniel W. Shuman, Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Tort Law: A Limited Subjective Standard of Care, 46 SMU L. REV. 409, 416 (1992).
2. David J. Karp, Evidence of Propensity and Probability in Sex Offense Cases and Other Cases, 70 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 15, 20 (1994).
3. Miguel A. Méndez, The Law of Evidence and the Search for a Stable Personality, 45 Emory L. J. 221 (1996).
4. Thomas L. Reed, Reading Gaol Revisited: Admission of Uncharged Misconduct Evidence in Sex Offender Cases, 21 AM. T. CRIM. L. 127, 130 (1993).
5. Edwin J. Mikkelsen et al., False Sexual-Abuse Allegations by Children and Adolescents: Contextual Factors and Clincal Subtypes, 46 AM. J. PSYCHOTHERAPY 566 (1992).