Three modelling approaches for seasonal streamflow droughts in southern Africa: The use of censored data;Trois méthodes pour la modélisation des étiages saisonniers en Afrique Australe: L'utilisation de données inférieures à un seuil de détection

Hydrological Sciences Journal

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 27-42

  Tate, E L ^a   Freeman, S N ^b  

^a CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^b THE NUNNERY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; DATA REDUCTION; DROUGHT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBABILITY; WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION;

CENSORED DATA; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATES;

STREAM FLOW;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DROUGHT; MODEL TEST; STREAMFLOW;

(SOUTHERN); AFRICA;

EID: 0034117710     PISSN: 02626667     EISSN: 21503435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02626660009492304     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aitkin, M., Anderson, D., Francis, B., and Hinde, J., 1989. Statistical Modelling in GLIM. Oxford.:Clarendon Press.
2. Bunck, C. M., and Pollock, K. H., 1993. “ Estimating survival of radio-tagged birds. ”. In Marked Individuals in the Study of Bird Population Edited by:Lebreton, J.-D., and North, P. M., 51–63. Basel, Switzerland:Birkhäuser Verlag.
3. Cox, D. R., and Oakes, D., 1984. Analysts of Survival Data. London, UK:Chapman and Hall.
4. Evans, M., Hastings, N., and Peacock, B., 1993. Statistical Distributions (Second edn). Chichester, Sussex, UK:John Wiley.
5. Hollander, M., and Proschan, F., 1979. Testing to determine the underlying distribution using randomly censored data. Biometrics, 35:393–401.
6. Hughes, D. A., and Smakhtin, V., 1996. Daily flow time series patching or extension:a spatial interpolation approach based on flow duration curves. Hydrol. Sci. J., 41 (6):851–871.
7. Institute of Hydrology. 1992. “ Low flow estimation in the United Kingdom. ”. In Report no. 108, Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
8. Lee, E. T., 1992. Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis (Second edn). Chichester, Sussex, UK:John Wiley.
9. McMahon, T. A., and Mein, R. G., 1986. River and Reservoir Yield. Littleton, Colorado, USA:Water Resources Publications.
10. Pollock, K. H., Winterstein, S. R., Bunck, C. M., and Curtis, P. D., 1989. Survival analysis in telemetry studies:the staggered entry design. J. Wildlife Manag., 53 (1):7–15.
11. Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., and Vetterling, W. T., 1989. Numerical recipes:The art of scientific computing. UK.:Cambridge University Press.
12. Shaw, E. M., 1994. Hydrology in Practice (Third edn). London, UK:Chapman and Hall.
13. She, N., 1997. Analyzing censored water quality data using a non-parametric approach. J. Am. Wat. Resour. Ass., 33 (3):615–624.
14. Siegel, S., and Castellan, N. J., Jr. 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences (Second edn). Singapore.:McGraw-Hill International Editions.
15. Tallaksen, L. M., Madsen, H., and Clausen, B., 1997. On the definition and modelling of streamflow drought duration and deficit volume. Hydrol. Sci. J., 42 (1):15–33.
16. UNESCO. 1997. “ Southern African FRIEND. ”. In Tech. Documents in Hydrology no. 15, UNESCO, Paris, France.
17. Woo, M.-K., and Tarhule, A., 1994. Streamflow droughts of northern Nigerian rivers. Hydrol. Sci. J., 39 (1):19–34.
18. Yevjevich, V., 1967. “ An objective approach to definitions and investigations of continental hydrologic droughts. ”. In Hydrol. papers no. 23 Fort Collins, Colorado, USA:Colorado State University.
19. Zelenhasic, E., and Salvai, A., 1987. A method of streamflow drought analysis. Wat. Resour. Res., 23 (1):156–168.