Short-term effect of auditory feedback on fundamental frequency after cochlear implantation

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 102-105

  Hamzavi, Jafar ^a   Deutsche, Werner ^b   Baumgartner, Wolf Dieter ^a   Bigenzahn, Wolfgang ^a   Gstoettner, Wolfgang ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b ERICH SCHMID INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Austria)

Author keywords

Auditory feedback; Combi 40+; Voice quality

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VOICE;

ADULT; AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; DEAFNESS; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 0034117115     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00206090009073060     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Maassen B, Povel D J. The effect of segmental and suprasegmental corrections on the intelligibility of deaf speech. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 78: 877–886
2. Cummings S, Groenewald E, Coetzee L, Hugo R, Van-Derlinde M. Speech production changes with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 166: 394–397
3. Leder S B, Spitzer J B, Kirchner J C. Speaking fundamental frequency of adventitiously profoundly deaf adult males. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1987; 96(3Pt l)322–324
4. Leder S B, Spitzer J B, Kirchner J C, Flevaris-Phillips C, Milner P, Richardson F. Speaking rate of adventitiously deaf male cochlear implant candidates. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82: 843–846
5. Leder S B, Spitzer J B, Milner P, Flevaris-Phillips C, Kirchner J C, Richardson F. Voice intensity of prospective cochlear implant candidates and normal hearing adult males. Laryngoscope 1987; 97: 224–227
6. Lane H, Webster J W. Speech deterioration in post-lingually deafened adults. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 859–866
7. Pruszewicz A, Demenko G, Wika T. Variability analysis of FO parameter in the voice of individuals with hearing disturbances. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1993; 113: 450–454
8. Leder S B, Spitzer J B, Kirchner J C. Immediate effects of cochlear implantation on voice quality. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1987; 244: 93–95
9. Kirk Kl, Edgerton B J. The effects of cochlear implant use on voice parameters. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1983; 16: 281–292
10. Ball V, Faulkner A, Fourcin A. The effects of two different speech-coding strategies on voice fundamental frequency control in deafened adults. Br J Audio 1990; 24: 393–409
11. Langereis M C, Bosman A J, van-Olphen A F, Smoorenburg G F. Effect of cochlear implantation on voice fundamental frequency in post-lingually deafened adults. Audiology 1998; 37: 219–230
12. Svirsky M A, Lane H, Perkell J S, Wozniak J. Effects of short-term auditory deprivation on speech production in adult cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92: 1284–1300
13. Szyfter W, Pruszewicz A, Woznica B, Swidzinski P, Szymiec E, Karlik M. The acoustic analysis of voice in patients with multi-channel cochlear implant. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol Bord 1996; 117: 225–227
14. McKay C M, McDermott H J. Perceptual performance of subjects with cochlear implants using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the Mini Speech Processor (MSP). Ear Hear 1993; 14: 350–367
15. Tartter V C, Chute P M, Hellman S A. The speech of a post-lingually deafened teenager during the first year of use of a multichannel cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 86: 2113–2121
16. Waldstein R S. Effects of post-lingual deafness on speech production: implications for the role of auditory feedback. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 2099–2114
17. Friedrich G. Qualitatssicherung in der Phoniatrie. HNO 1996; 44: 401–416