Ultrasound-guided renal biopsy: Experience using an automated core biopsy system

Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 107-113

  Chan, Raymond ^a   Common, Andrew A ^a   Marcuzzi, Daniel ^a  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; KIDNEY BIOPSY; KIDNEY FAILURE; KIDNEY GRAFT REJECTION; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; ULTRASOUND;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMANS; KIDNEY DISEASES; KIDNEY FAILURE, ACUTE; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 0034115807     PISSN: 08465371     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Iversen P, Brun C. Aspiration biopsy of the kidney. Am J Med 1951;11: 324-30.
2. Burnstein DM, Schwartz MM, Korbet SM. Percutaneous renal biopsy with the use of real-time ultrasound. Am J Nephrol 1991;11: 195-200.
3. Altebarmakian VK, Guthinger WP, Yakub YN, Gutierrez OH, Linke CA. Percutaneous renal biopsies: complications and their management. Urology 1981;18(2):118-22.
4. Jorstad S, Borander U, Berg KJ, Wideroe TE. Evaluation of complications due to percutaneous renal biopsy: a clinical and angiographic study. Am J Kidney Dis 1984;4(2):162-5.
5. Parrish AE. Complications of percutaneous renal biopsy: a review of 37 years' experience. Clin Nephrol 1992;38(3):135-41.
6. Diaz-Buxo JA, Donadio JV. Complications of percutaneous renal biopsy: an analysis of 1000 consecutive biopsies. Clin Nephrol 1975;4:223-7.
7. Gainza FJ, Minguela I, Lopez-Vidaur I, Ruiz LM, Lampreabe I. Evaluation of complications due to percutaneous renal biopsy in allografts and native kidneys with color-coded Doppler sonography. Clin Nephrol 1995;43(5):303-8.
8. Belitsky P, Gupta R. Minicore needle biopsy of kidney transplants: a safer sampling method. J Urol 1990; 144:310-1.
9. Bogan ML, Kopecky KK, Kraft JL, Holladay AO, Filo RS, Leapman SB, et al. Needle biopsy of renal allografts: comparison of two techniques. Radiology 1990;174:273-5.
10. Burnstein DM, Korbet SM, Schwartz M. The use of the automatic core biopsy system in percutaneous renal biopsies: a comparative study. Am J Kidney Dis 1993; 22(4):545-52.
11. Dowd PE, Mata JA, Crow A, Culkin DJ, Venable DD. Ultrasound guided percutaneous renal biopsy using an automatic core biopsy system. J Urol 1991;146:1216-7.
12. Doyle AJ, Gregory MC, Terreros DA. Percutaneous native renal biopsy: comparison of a 1.2 mm spring-driven system with a traditional 2 mm hand-driven system. Am J Kidney Dis 1994;23(4):498-503.
13. Kim D, Kim H, Shin G, Ku S, Ma K, Shin S, et al. A randomized, prospective, comparative study of manual and automated renal biopsies. Am J Kidney Dis 1998;32(3):426-31.
14. Kovalik EC, Schwab SJ, Gunnells JC, Bowie D, Smith SR. No change in complication rate using spring-loaded gun compared to traditional percutaneous renal allograft biopsy techniques. Clin Nephrol 1996; 45(6):383-5.
15. McDonald MW, Sosnowski JT, Mahin EJ, Willard DA, Lamm DL. Automatic spring-loaded biopsy gun with ultrasonic control for renal transplant biopsy. Urology 1993;42(5):580-2.
16. Song JH, Cronan JJ. Percutaneous biopsy in diffuse renal disease: comparison of 18- and 14-gauge automated biopsy devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998;9:651-655
17. Tung KT, Downes MO, O'Donnell PJ. Renal biopsy in diffuse renal disease - experience with a 14-gauge automated biopsy gun. Clin Radiol 1992;46:111-3.
18. Ralls PW, Barakos JA, Kaptein EM, Friedman PE, Fouladian G, Boswell WD, et al. Renal biopsy-related hemorrhage: frequency and comparison of CT and sonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11(6): 1031-4.
19. Madaio M, Cohen J, Harrington J, Kassirer J, Madias N, Zusman C. Renal biopsy. Kidney Int 1990;38: 529-43.