Implementing a citizen-based deliberative process on the Internet: The Buckinghamshire Health Authority Electronic Citizens' Jury in the UK

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 45-64

  Finney, Colin ^a,b,c  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b Natl Museum of Science and Industry   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERNET; LEGAL SYSTEM;

ENGLAND(BUCKINGHAMSHIRE); UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0034115457     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154300781782165     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. J Abramson, F Arterton and G Orren (1988), The Electronic Commonwealth: The Impact of New Technologies on Democratic Politics (Basic Books, New York).
2. F Arterton (1987), Teledemocracy: Can Technology Protect Democracy (Sage, Newberry Park, CA).
3. BHA, Buckinghamshire Health Authority (1997a), "Notes from the final meeting of the Buckinghamshire Health Authority Citizens' Jury Steering Group", 8 April.
4. BHA, Buckinghamshire Health Authority (1997b), "Facilitators comments", Buckingham Health Authority Citizens' Jury Final Report.
5. B Bimber (1996), The Politics of Experts in Congress: The Rise and Fall of the Office of Technology Assessment (State University of New York Press).
6. Bucks Examiner (1997), "Back pain policy: you can vote", 14 March.
7. D Campbell (1996), "Citizen's jury takes on drugs", The Guardian, 18 April.
8. A Coote and J Lenaghan (1997), Citizens' Juries: Theory into Practice (IPPR, London).
9. N Crosby (1995), "Citizens juries: one solution for difficult environmental questions", in Renn et al (1995), pages 157-174.
10. P Dienel and O Renn (1995), "Planning cells: a gate to 'fractal' mediation", in Renn et al (1995). pages 117-140.
11. J Doble (1995), "Public opinion about issues characterized by technological complexity and scientific uncertainty", Public Understanding of Science, 4(2), pages 95-118.
12. A Etzioni (1972), "Minerva: an electronic town hall", Policy Sciences, 3, pages 457-474.
13. C Finney (forthcoming), "The electronic consensus debate".
14. C Finney (1999), "Extending public consultation via the Internet: the experience of the UK Advisory Committee on Genetic Testing electronic consultation", Science and Public Policy, 26(5), October, pages 361-373.
15. F Fischer (1990), Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise (Sage Publications, London).
16. J Fishkin (1992), "Talk of the tube", The American Prospect, 11, pages 46-52.
17. J Fishkin (1995), The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy (Yale University Press, New Haven).
18. P Hirst and S Khilnani (1996), "Introduction", in P Hirst and S Khilnani (editors), Reinventing Democracy (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford).
19. A Irwin (1995), Citizen Science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development (Routledge, London).
20. S Mclver (1997), "Analysis of jurors' questionnaires: Buckinghamshire HA, King's Fund Citizens' Jury Programme Evaluation", Health Services Management Centre, March.
21. J Miller (1993), Science & Engineering Indicators (National Science Board, Washington, DC).
22. D Nelkin (1977), Technological Decisions and Democracy: European Experiments in Public Participation (Sage, Beverly Hills).
23. B New (1996), "King's Fund Major Grants Programme update: citizens' juries", December.
24. OECD (1979), Technology on Trial: Public Participation in Decision-making related to Science and Technology (OECD,Paris).
25. J Rawls (1973), A Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
26. O Renn, T Webler and P Wiedemann (editors) (1995), Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London).
27. J Stewart (1997), "More innovation in democratic practice", University of Birmingham School of Public Policy Occasional Paper 9.
28. J Stewart, E Kendall and A Coote (1994), Citizens' Juries (Institute for Public Policy Research, London).
29. B Wynne (1982), Rationality or Ritual: The Windscale Inquiry and Nuclear Decisions in Britain (British Society for the History of Science Monographs, Chalfont Saint Giles).