Modeling wells in variably saturated soil with wellbore fluid gravity segregation

Advances in Water Resources

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 689-697

  Sleep, Brent E ^a   Sehayek, Lily ^b   Chien, Calvin C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c DUPONT COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; FLOW OF WATER; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOISTURE; MULTIPHASE FLOW; SOILS; WATER LEVELS;

FLUID GRAVITY SEGREGATION;

WATER WELLS;

MODELING; POROUS MEDIUM; SATURATED MEDIUM; SOIL MOISTURE; VADOSE ZONE; WELL;

EID: 0034114626     PISSN: 03091708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0309-1708(00)00005-1     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Behie A., Collins D., Forsyth P.A., Sammon P.H. Fully coupled multiblock wells in oil simulation. SPEJ. 25(4):1985;535-542.
2. Collins D., Nghiem L., Sharma R., Li Y.-K. Field-scale simulation of horizontal wells. J Cdn Pet Tech. 31(1):1992;14-21.
3. Heimovaara T.J., Bouten W. A computer-controlled 36-channel time domain reflectometry system for monitoring soil water contents. Water Resour Res. 26(10):1990;2311-2316.
4. Huyakorn P.S., Pinder G.F. Computational methods in subsurface flow. 1983;Academic Press, New York.
5. Lacombe S., Sudicky E.A., Frape S.K., Unger A.J.A. Influence of leaky boreholes on cross-formational groundwater flow and contaminant transport. Water Resour Res. 31(8):1995;1871-1882.
6. Lenhard R.J., Parker J.C. A model for hysteretic constitutive relations governing multiphase flow. 2. Permeability-saturation relations. Water Resour Res. 23(12):1987;2197-2206.
7. McClure P.D., Sleep B.E. Simulation of bioventing for soil and groundwater remediation. ASCEJ Env Eng. 122(11):1996;1003-1012.
8. Parker J.C., Lenhard R.J. A model for hysteretic constitutive relations governing multiphase flow. 1. Saturation-pressure relations. Water Resour Res. 23(12):1987;2187-2196.
9. Peaceman D.W. Interpretation of well-block pressures in numerical reservoir simulation. SPEJ. 18(3):1978;183-194.
10. Peaceman D.W. Interpretation of well-block pressures in numerical reservoir simulation with nonsquare grid blocks and anisotropic permeability. SPEJ. 23(3):1983;531-543.
11. Peaceman D.W. Interpretation of wellblock pressures in numerical reservoir simulation. Part 3. Off-center and multiple wells within a wellblock. SPE Res Eng. 5(5):1990;227-232.
12. She H., Sleep B.E. Removal of perchloroethylene from soil by steam flushing in a two-dimensional laboratory cell. Ground Water Monit Remed. 19(2):1999;70-77.
13. Sleep B.E., Sykes J.F. Compositional simulation of groundwater contamination by organic compounds. 1. Model development and verification. Water Resour Res. 29(6):1993;1697-1708.
14. Sudicky E.A., Unger A.J.A., Lacombe S. A noniterative technique for the direct implementation of well bore boundary conditions in three-dimensional heterogeneous formations. Water Resour Res. 31(2):1995;411-416.
15. Zegelin S.J., White I., Jenkins D.R. Improved field probes for soil water content and electrical conductivity measurement using time domain reflectometry. Water Resour Res. 25(11):1989;2367-2376.