Novel materials to enhance keratoprosthesis integration

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 84, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 640-644

  Sandeman, S R ^a   Faragher, R G A ^a   Allen, M C A ^a   Liu, C ^b   Lloyd, A W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

^b SUSSEX EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2 PHENOXYETHANOL; ACRYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CALCEIN; ETHIDIUM; FREE RADICAL; POLYMACON;

ARTICLE; BIOASSAY; CELL ADHESION; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA CELL; CYTOLYSIS; CYTOTOXICITY TEST; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROGEL; KERATOPROSTHESIS; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CORNEA; HUMANS; HYDROGELS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; POLYHYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION;

EID: 0034113157     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.84.6.640     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Barnham J, Roper-Hall M. Keratoprosthesis: a long-term review. Br J Ophthalmol 1983;67:468-74.
2. Cardona, H. The cardona experience: 40 years experience. Refract Corneal Surg 1991;7:468-71.
3. Dohlman C, Doane, M. Some factors influencing outcome after keratoprosthesis surgery. Cornea 1994;13:214-18.
4. Ricci R, Pecorella A, Ciardi A, et al. Strampelli's osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis. Clinical and histological long-term features of three prostheses. Br J Ophthalmol 1992;76:232-4.
5. Hicks C, Chirila T, Dalton P, et al. Keratoprostheses: advancing toward a true artificial cornea. Surv Ophthalmol 1997;42:175-89.
6. Lydon M, Minnett T, Tighe B. Cellular interactions with synthetic polymer surfaces in culture. Biomaterials 1985;6: 396-402.
7. Smetana K, Lukas J, Paleckova V, et al. Effects of chemical structure of hydrogels on the adhesion and phenotypic characteristics of human monocytes such as expression of falectins and other carbohydrate-binding sites. Biomaterials 1997;18:1009-14.
8. Kunzler J, McGee J. Contact lens materials. Chem Ind 1995; 16:651-5.
9. Peluso G, Petillo O, Anderson J, et al. The differential effects of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) and poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)/poly(caprolactone) polymers on cell proliferation and collagen synthesis by human lung fibroblasts. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;34:327-36.
10. Bergethon P, Trinkaus-Randell V, Fransblau C. Modified hydroxyethylmethacrylate hydrogels as a modeling tool for the study of cell-substratum interactions. J Cell Sci 1989;92:111-21.
11. Crawford G, Constable I, Chirila T, et al. Tissue interaction with hydrogel sponges implanted in the rabbit cornea. Cornea 1993;12:348-57.
12. Crawford G, Chirila T, Vijayasekaran S, et al. Preliminary evaluation of a hydrogel core-and-skirt keratoprosthesis in the rabbit cornea. J Refract Surg 1996;12:525-9.
13. Hicks C, Chirila T, Clayton A, et al. Clinical results of implantation of the chirila keratoprosthesis in rabbits. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:18-25.
14. Civerchia-Perez L, Faris B, LaPointe G, et al. Use of collagen-hydroxyethylmethacrylate hydrogels for cell growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1980;77:2064-8.
15. Hicks C, Lou X, Platten S, et al. Keratoprosthesis results in animals an update. Aust NZ J Ophthalmol 1997;25(Suppl 1):S50-2.
16. Dropcova S, Denyer S, Lloyd A, et al. A standard strain of human ocular keratocytes. Ophthalmic Res 1999;31:33-41.
17. Lee J, Khang G, Lee H. Interaction of cells on chargeable functional group gradient surfaces. Biomaterials 1997;18: 351-8.