Maximum car ownership under constraints of road capacity and parking space

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 145-170

  Tam, M L ^a   Lam, William H K ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Bi level programming; Car ownership

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; AUTOMOBILES; HEURISTIC METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; PARKING; ROADS AND STREETS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TRAFFIC CONTROL;

ASSIGNMENT PROBLEM; BI-LEVEL PROGRAMMING; EQUILIBRIUM TRIP DISTRIBUTION; MAXIMUM CAR OWNERSHIP; ROAD CAPACITY; VEHICULAR TRIP PRODUCTION; ZONAL CAR OWNERSHIP;

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION;

CAR OWNERSHIP; PARKING; PLANNING METHOD; ROAD TRANSPORT;

EID: 0034110949     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0965-8564(98)00070-6     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ben-Akiva M., Manski C.F., Sherman L. A behavioral approach to modelling household motor vehicle ownership and applications to aggregate policy analysis. Environment and Planning A. 13:1981;399-411.
2. Bunch, D.S., Kitamura, R., 1989. Multinomial probit estimation revisited: Testing of new algorithms and evaluation of alternative model specifications for trinomial models of household car ownership. Transportation Research Group Research Report UCD-TRG-RR-4, University of California, Davis, CA.
3. Traffic Assignment Manual. US Department of Commerce. 1964;Urban Planning Division, Washington DC.
4. Evans S.P. Derivation and analysis of some model for combining trip distribution and assignment. Transportation Research. 10:1976;37-57.
5. Fiacco A.V. Sensitivity analysis for nonlinear programming using penalty methods. Mathematical Programming. 10:1976;287-311.
6. Fisk C.S. Game theory and transportation systems modeling. Transportation Research. 18B:1984;301-313.
7. Friesz T.L., Tobin R.L., Cho H.J., Mehta N.J. Sensitivity analysis based heuristic algorithms for mathematical programs with variational inequality constraints. Mathematical Programming. 48:1990;265-284.
8. Han, B., 1997. Accessibility, generation and license holding effects in car ownership models. Licentiate thesis, Swedish Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Infrastructure and Planning, Division of Traffic and Transport Planning, Stockholm.
9. Jansson J.O. Car demand modelling and forecasting: a new approach. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy. 23:1989;125-140.
10. Kitamura R. A panel analysis of household car ownership and mobility. Proceedings of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers. 383/IV-7:1987;13-27.
11. Kitamura, R. 1988. A dynamic model system of household car ownership, trip generation, and modal split: Model development and simulation experiment. Proceedings of the 14th Australian Road Research Board Conference, Part 3, pp. 96-111.
12. Lam W.H.K., Huang H.J. A combined trip distribution and assignment model for multiple user classes. Transportation Research. 26B:1992;275-287.
13. Leake G.R., Huzayyin A.S. Accessibility measures and their suitability for use in trip generation models. Traffic Engineering and Control. 20:1979;566-572.
14. LeBlanc L.J., Boyce D.E. A bilevel programming algorithm for exact solution of the network design problem with user optimal flows. Transportation Research. 20B:1986;259-265.
15. LeBlanc L.J., Morlok E.K., Pierskalla W. An efficient approach to solving the road network equilibrium traffic assignment problem. Transportation Research. 9:1975;309-318.
16. Oppenheim N. Equilibrium trip distribution/assignment with variable destination costs. Transportation Research. 27B:1993;207-217.
17. Ortúzar J.de D., Willumsen L.G. Modelling Transport. 1994;John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
18. Pendyala R.M., Kostyniuk L.P., Goulias K.G. A repeated cross-sectional evaluation of car ownership. Transportation. 22:1995;165-184.
19. Ran B., Rouphail N.M., Tarko A., Boyce D.E. Toward a class of link travel time functions for dynamic assignment models on signalized networks. Transportation Research. 31B:1997;277-290.
20. Sheffi Y. Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods. 1985;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
21. Tobin R.L., Friesz T.L. Sensitivity analysis for equilibrium network flows. Transportation Science. 22:1988;242-250.
22. Train K. Qualitative Choice Analysis: Theory, Econometrics, and an Application to Automobile Demand. 1986;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
23. Train K., Lohrer M. Vehicle Ownership and Usage: An Integrated System of Disaggregate Demand Models. 1982;Cambridge Systematics, Berkeley, CA.
24. Wohl M., Martin B.V. Traffic System Analysis for Engineers and Planners. 1967;McGraw-Hill, New York.
25. Yang H. Sensitivity analysis for the elastic-demand network equilibrium problem with applications. Transportation Research. 31B:1997;55-70.
26. Yang H., Lam W.H.K. Optimal road tolls under conditions of queuing and congestion. Transportation Research. 30A:1996;319-332.
27. Yang H., Yagar S. Traffic assignment and traffic control in general freeway-arterial corridor systems. Transportation Research. 28B:1994;463-486.
28. Yang H., Bell M.G.H., Meng Q. Zonal development potential from the perspective of equilibrium network capacity. Working paper. Department of Civil Engineering. The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong. Submitted for publication:1996.