Ongoing evaluation in AIDS-Service organizations: Building meaningful evaluation activities

Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 21-39

  Miller, Robin Lin ^a   Cassel, J Brian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b Gay Men's Health Crisis Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

AIDS service organizations; HIV prevention; Program evaluation

Indexed keywords

ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROME; ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; MEDICAL SERVICE; MODEL; POLITICS; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SKILL;

EID: 0034110225     PISSN: 10852352     EISSN: 15407330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J005v19n01_02     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Altman, D., 1994. Power and community:Organizational and cultural responses to AIDS, Bristol, PA:Taylor & Francis.
2. Campbell, D. T., and Stanley, J. C., 1963. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research, Chicago, IL:Rand McNally.
3. Cassel, J. B., An internal evaluation of a controversial policy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association. November. Vancouver, British Columbia
4. Conrad, K. J., ed. 1994. “Critically Evaluating the Role of Experiments [special issue]”. In New Directions in Program Evaluation, 63San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
5. Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T., 1979. Quasi-experimentation:Design and analysis issues for field settings, Chicago, IL:Rand McNally.
6. Council on Foundations. 1993. Evaluation for foundations:Concepts, cases, guidelines, and resources, San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
7. Cronbach, L. J., 1982. Designing evaluations of education and social programs, San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
8. Devine, J. A., Wright, J. D., and Joyner, L. M., 1994. “Issues in implementing a randomized experiment in a field setting”. In Critically Evaluating the Role of Experiments [special issue], New Directions in Program Evaluation Edited by:Conrad, K. J., Vol. 63, 27–4. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
9. Fetterman, D. M., Kaftarian, S. J., and Wandersman, A., 1996. Empowerment evaluation:Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability, Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
10. Finne, H., Levin, M., and Nilssen, T., 1995. Trailing research:A model for useful program evaluation. Evaluation, 1(1):11–31.
11. GMHC. 1991. Double minorities:Black and Latino men who have sex with men, New York, NY:GMHC.
12. GMHC. 1993. Managing caseload growth in client services, New York, NY:GMHC.
13. GMHC. 1994a. Obtaining secondary prevention information and making health-related decisions, New York, NY:GMHC.
14. GMHC. 1994b. Tuberculosis education and treatment support program, report 1, New York, NY:GMHC.
15. GMHC. 1994c. Tuberculosis education and treatment support program, report 2 New York, NY:GMHC.
16. GMHC. 1994d. Tuberculosis education and treatment support program, report 3, New York, NY:GMHC.
17. GMHC. 1994e. Client satisfaction survey, New York, NY:GMHC.
18. GMHC. 1995a. Clients' experiences and satisfaction with intake, New York, NY:GMHC.
19. GMHC. 1995b. Tuberculosis education and treatment support program, report 5, New York, NY:GMHC.
20. GMHC. 1996a. Assessing GMHC clients' needs, New York, NY:GMHC.
21. GMHC. 1996b. Patterns of service utilization in client programs, New York, NY:GMHC.
22. Love, A., 1991. Internal evaluation:Building organizations from within, Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
23. Miller, R. L., 1994. Safer sex maintenance among gay men, New York:New York University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
24. Miller, R. L., 1995. Assisting gay men to maintain safer sex:An evaluation of an AIDS service organization's safer sex maintenance program. AIDS Education and Prevention:An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7(Suppl. 5):48–63.
25. National Community AIDS Partnership. 1993. Evaluating HIV/AIDS prevention programs in community-based organizations, Washington, DC:Author.
26. Patton, M., 1986. Utilization-focused evaluation, Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
27. Peterson, J. L., Card, J. J., Eisen, M. B., and Sherman-Williams, B., 1994. Evaluating teenage pregnancy prevention and other social programs:Ten stages of assessment. Family Planning Perspectives, 26(3):116–131.
28. Rossi, P. H., and Freeman, J. E., 1995. Evaluation:A systematic approach, 5th ed, Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
29. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., and Leviton, L. C., 1991. Foundations of program evaluation:Theories of practice, Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
30. Stevens, C. J., and Dial, M., eds. 1994. Preventing the Misuse of Evaluation [special issue], New Directions in Program Evaluation San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass. (64)
31. Weiss, C. H., 1972. Evaluating action programs:Readings in social action and education, Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
32. Weiss, C. H., 1981. “Measuring the use of evaluation”. In Utilizing evaluation:Concepts and measuring techniques, Edited by:Ciarlo, J. A., 17–3. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
33. Wholey, J. S., 1977. “Evaluability assessment.”. In Evaluation research methods:A basic guide, Edited by:Rutman, L., Newbury Park, CA:Sage.