Decimalization of the Oxford Clinical Cataract Classification and Grading System

Ophthalmic Epidemiology

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 49-60

  Sparrow, John M ^a   Frost, N A ^b   Pantelides, E P ^b   Laidlaw, D A H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Cataract grading; Decimalization; Scale sensitivity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CATARACT; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY;

EID: 0034107167     PISSN: 09286586     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/0928-6586(200003)711-2ft049     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. 1 Chylack LT, Leske MC, Sperduto R, Khu P, McCarthy D. Lens Opacities Classification System. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:330-4.
2. 2 Chylack LT, Leske C, McCarthy D, Khu P, Kashiwagi T, Sperduto R. Lens opacities classification system II. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:991-7.
3. 3 Sparrow JM, Bron AJ, Brown NAP, Ayliffe W, Hill AR. The Oxford clinical cataract classification and grading system. Int Ophthalmol 1986; 9:207-25.
4. 4 Sparrow JM, Hill AR, Ayliffe W, Bron AJ, Brown NAP. Human lens nuclear colour matching and brunescence grading in vivo. Int Ophthalmol 1988;11:139-49.
5. 5 Sparrow JM, Ayliffe W, Bron AJ, Brown NAP, Hill AR. Inter-observer and intra-observer variability of the Oxford clinical cataract classification and grading system. Int Ophthalmol 1988;11:151-7.
6. 6 Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch TW, Taylor HR. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:422-32.
7. 7 Chylack LT, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The lens opacities classification system III. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111:831-6.
8. 8 Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. (2nd ed.) New Jersey: LFA Publishers, 1988.
9. 9 Brown NAP, Vrensen G, Shun-Shin GA, Willekens B. Lamellar separation in the human lens: The case for fibre folds. A combined in vivo and electron microscopic study. Eye 1989; 3:597-605.
10. 10 Newhall SM, Nickerson D, Judd DB. Final report of the OSA sub-committee on the spacing of the Munsell colours. J Opt Soc Am 1943; 33:385-418.
11. 11 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
12. 12 Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Measurement 1973;33:613-9.
13. 13 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:159-74.
14. 14 Bron AJ, Brown NAP. Peri-nuclear lens retrodots: a role for ascorbate in cataractogenesis. Br J Ophthalmol 1987;71:86-95.
15. 15 Leske MC, Chylack LT, Wu SU. The lens opacities case-control study: risk factors for cataract. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:244-51.
16. 16 Taylor HR, West SK. The clinical grading of lens opacities. Austr NZ J Ophthalmol 1989;17:81-6.
17. 17 Laties A, Keates E, Lippa E, et al. Field test reliability of a new lens opacity rating system utilizing slit-lamp examination. Lens Eye Toxicol Res 1989;6:443-64.
18. 18 Klein BEK, Klein R, Linton KLP, Magli YL, Neider MW. Assessment of cataracts from photographs in the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1990;97:1428-33.
19. 19 Sasaki K, Shibata T, Obazawa H, et al. Classification system for cataracts: Application by the Japanese cooperative cataract epidemiology study group. Ophthalm Res 1990;22 (Suppl 1):46-50.
20. 20 West SK, Munoz B, Wang F, Taylor H. Measuring progression of lens opacities for longitudinal studies. Curr Eye Res 1993;12:123-32.