Maxillary dental arch form related to voice classification: A pilot study

Journal of Voice

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 82-91

  Marunick, Mark T ^a,c   Menaldi, Cristina J ^b  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Lakeshore Ear Nose Throat Center   (United States)

^c WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Maxillary arch form; Palate form; Voice classification

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAXILLA; MORPHOMETRICS; NORMAL HUMAN; PALATE; SINGING; TOOTH ARCH; VOICE;

EID: 0034106053     PISSN: 08921997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0892-1997(00)80097-1     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Fletcher S. Palatometric specifications of stop, affricative, and sibilant sounds. J Speech Hear Res. 1994;32:736-748.
2. Hamlet S. Speech compensations for prosthodontically created palatal asymmetries. J Speech Hear Res. 1994;31:48-53.
3. Wilson S, Chiu W, Shadle C, Carter J. Electropalatography I: technical developments. Quantitative measures of the palate using enhanced electropalatography. Eur J Disord Commun. 1994;30:149-160.
4. Bishara S, Bayati P, Zaher A, Jacobsen J. Comparison of the dental arch changes in patients with class II, division I malocclusions: extraction vs. nonextraction treatments. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:351-358.
5. Friede H, Persson E, Lilja J, Elauder A. Lohmander-Agerskov A, Soderpalm E. Maxillary dental arch and occlusion in patients with repaired clefts of the secondary palate. Influence of push back palatal surgery. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1994;27:297-305.
6. Diwan R, Elahi J. A comparative study between three ethnic groups to derive some standards for maxillary arch dimensions. J Oral Rehab. 1994;17:43-48.
7. Perkell J. Physiology of Speech Production: Results and Implications of Quantitative Cineradiographic Study. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1969.
8. Brown W. Speaking fundamental frequency: characteristics as a function of age and professional singing. J Voice. 1994; 5:310-315.
9. Ametrano-Jackson C. El canto coral en los niños y en los adultes. Principios de Foniatria. 1981;145-150.
10. Jackson-Menaldi C. La Voz Normal. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Médica Panamericana; 1992:167-189.
11. Jackson-Menaldi C. Fundamental frequency and voice classification. First International Voice Consortium. Abstract Book. Porto, Portugal; 1995:0272.
12. Jackson-Menaldi C. Aspectos generales de la voz. In: Garcia Tapia Urutia R, Corbeta M, eds. Diagnóstico y Tratamiento de los Trastornos de la Voz. Madrid, Spain: Garsi SA; 1996:203-216.
13. Titze IR, Baken RJ, Herzel S. Evidence of chaos in vocal fold vibrations. In: Titze IR, ed. Vocal Fold Physiology: Frontiers in Basic Science. San Diego, Calif: Singular Publishing Group Inc; 1993.
14. Shipp T et al. Acoustic and temporal correlates of perceived age. J Voice. 1992;6:211-216.
15. Sundberg J. The level of the singing formant and the source spectra of professional bass singers. STL-QPSR. 1970;4:21-39.
16. Sundberg J. An articulatory interpretation of the singing formant. STL-QPSR. 1972;1:45-53.
17. Bloothooft G, Plomp R. Spectral analysis of sung vowels, II. The effect of fundamental frequency on vowel spectra. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994;77(4).