Strategic trade policy, intellectual property rights protection, and North-South trade

Journal of Development Economics

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 27-60

  Žigić, Krešimir ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS   (Czech Republic)

^b CEPR   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Intellectual property rights protection; Market structure; Optimal tariffs; Social welfare; Strategic predation; Strategic trade policy; Technological spillovers

Indexed keywords

FREE TRADE; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; TRADE POLICY;

EID: 0034105951     PISSN: 03043878     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3878(99)00060-7     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bayoumi, T., Coe, D.T., Helpman, E., 1996. R&D spillovers and global growth. CEPR Discussion Paper, no. 1467.
2. Bhagwatti J.N. Is free trade passé after all? Weltwirschaftliches Archive. 1:1989;17-44.
3. Bhattacharjea A. Strategic tariffs and endogenous market structures: trade and industrial polices under imperfect competition. Journal of Development Economics. 47:1995;287-312.
4. Braga, C.P., 1990. The developing country case for and against intellectual property protection. In: Siebeck, W.E. (Ed.), Strengthening Protection of Intellectual Property in Developing Countries: A Survey of the Literature. World Bank Discussion Papers, no. 112.
5. Braga, H.C., Willmore, L.N., 1991. Technological imports and technological effort: an analysis of their determinants ants in Brazilian firms. The Journal of Industrial Economics, pp. 421-433.
6. Brander, J., 1995. Strategic trade policy. In: Grosmann, G.M., Rogoff, K. (Eds.), The Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 3. North-Holland.
7. Brander J., Krugman P. A "reciprocal dumping" model of international trade. Journal of International Economics. 15:1983;313-323.
8. Brander, J., Spencer, B., 1984. Tariff protection and imperfect competition. In: Kierzkowski, H. (Ed.), Monopolistic Competition and International Trade. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 194-206.
9. Cheng L.K. Assisting domestic industries under international oligopoly: the relevance of the nature of competition to optimal policies. American Economic Review. 78:1988;764-768.
10. Chin, J.C., Grossman, G.M., 1990. Intellectual property rights and North-South trade. In: Jones, R.W., Krueger, A.O. (Eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Baldwin. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.
11. Dasgupta, P., 1986. The theory of technological competition. In: Stiglitz, J.E., Mathewson, G.F. (Eds.), New Developments in the Analysis of Market Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 519-547.
12. D'Aspremont-Jacquemin A. Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. American Economic Review. 78:1988;113-137.
13. Deardorff A.V. Welfare effects of global patent protection. Economica. 59:1992;35-59.
14. De Bondt R., Slaets P., Cassiman B. The degree of spillovers and the number of rivals for maximum effective R&D. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 10:1992;35-54.
15. Diwan I., Rodrik D. Patents, appropriate technology, and North-South trade. Journal of International Economics. 30:1991;27-47.
16. Dixit A.K. International trade policy for oligopolistic industries. Economic Journal. 94:1984;. Supplement 1-16.
17. Dixit A.K. Anti-dumping and countervailing duties under oligopoly. European Economic Review. 32:1988;55-68.
18. Evanson, R.E., 1990. Survey of empirical studies. In: Siebeck, W.E. (Ed.), Strengthening Protection of Intellectual Property in Developing Countries: A Survey of the Literature. World Bank Discussion Papers, No. 112.
19. Ferrantino J.M. The effect of intellectual property rights on international trade and investment. Weltwirschftilches Archive. 129:1993;300-331.
20. Gould M.D., Gruben W.C. The role of intellectual property rights in economic growth. Journal of Development Economics. 48:1996;323-350.
21. Grossman, G.M., Helpman, E., 1995. Technology and trade. In: Grosmann, G.M., Rogoff, K. (Eds.), The Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 3. North-Holland.
22. Grossman, G.M., Maggi, G., 1998. Free trade versus strategic trade: a peek into Pandora's box. CEPR Discussion Paper, no. 1784.
23. Helpman E. Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights. Econometrica. 61(6):1993;1247-1280.
24. Hinloopen, J., 1997. Subsidizing R&D-cooperatives. Discussion paper, no. 15. Centre for Industrial Economics, University of Copenhagen.
25. Kamien I.M., Muller E., Zang Research joint venture and R&D cartels. American Economic Review. 82:1992;1293-1306.
26. Katz M.I. An analysis of cooperative research and development. Rand Journal of Economics. 4:1986;538-556.
27. Krugman, P.R., 1984. Import protection as export promotion. In: Kierzkowski, H. (Ed.), Monopolistic Competition and International Trade. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1984, pp. 194-206.
28. Krugman P.R. Is free trade passé? Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2:1987;131-141.
29. Leahy D., Neary J.P. Public policy towards R&D in oligopolistic industries. American Economic Review. 87:1997;642-662.
30. Levin R.C., Klevorick A.K., Nelson R.R., Winter S.G. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Pares on Economic Activity. 3:1987;783-831.
31. Levy S., Nolan S. Trade and foreign investment polices under imperfect competition. Journal of Development Economics. 37:1992;31-62.
32. Mansfield, E., 1985. How rapidly does new industrial technology leak out? Journal of Industrial Economics (December), 217-223.
33. Mansfield, E., 1994. Intellectual property protection, foreign direct investment, and technology transfer. IFC Discussion Paper, no. 19. The World Bank, Washington, DC.
34. Mansfield E., Schwartz M., Wagner S. Imitation costs and patents: an empirical study. Economic Journal. 91:1981;907-918.
35. Martin, S., 1993. Advanced Industrial Economics. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
36. Neary J.P. Cost asymmetries in international subsidy games: should government help winners or losers. Journal of International Economic. 37:1994;197-218.
37. Neven D., Siotis G. Technology sourcing and FDI in the EC: an empirical evaluation. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 14(5):1996;543-560.
38. Rapp R., Rozek R. Benefits and costs of intellectual property protection in developing countries. Journal of World Trade. 24(2):1990;75-102.
39. Spence, M., 1986. Cost reduction, competition and industry performance. In: Stiglitz, J.E., Mathewson, G.F. (Eds.), New Developments in the Analysis of Market Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 475-518.
40. Spencer B.J., Brander J.A. International R&D rivalry and industrial strategy. Review of Economic Studies. 50:1983;707-722.
41. Spencer, B.J., 1986. What should trade policy target? In: Krugman, P.R. (Ed.), Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
42. Suzumura N. Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in an oligopoly with spillovers. American Economic Review. 82:1992;1307-1320.
43. United States International Trade Commission, 1988. Foreign protection of intellectual property rights and the effect on US Industry and Trade, USITC Publication 2065.
44. Venables, A.J., 1994. Trade policy under imperfect competition: a numerical assessment. In: Krugman, P.R., Smith, A. (Eds.), Empirical Studies of Strategic Trade Policy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
45. Vishwasrao S. Intellectual property rights and the mode of technology transfer. Journal of Development Economics. 44:1994;381-402.
46. Žigić, K., 1996a. Intellectual property rights and the North-South trade: the role of spillovers. CERGE-EI, Working Paper, no. 92.
47. Žigić, K., 1996b. Optimal tariff, spillovers and the North-South trade. CERGE-EI, Working Paper, no. 93.
48. Žigić K. Intellectual property rights violations and spillovers in North-South trade. European Economic Review. 42:1998;1779-1799.
49. Žigić, K., 1998b. Strategic trade policy, spillovers, and uncertain mode of competition: Cournot versus Bertrand. CERGE-EI, Working Paper, no. 123.