Validation and application of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure bone mineral density in rabbit vertebrae

Journal of Clinical Densitometry

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 49-55

  Norris, Shane A ^a,b   Pettifor, John M ^b   Gray, Dave A ^a   Biscardi, Anna ^a   Buffenstein, Rochelle ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density; DXA; Rabbit

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE MINERAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUMBAR SPINE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; VALIDATION PROCESS; VOLUMETRY;

EID: 0034105940     PISSN: 10946950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1385/JCD:3:1:049     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. 1. Rozenberg S, Vandromme J, Neve J, et al. 1995 Precision and accuracy of in vivo bone mineral measurement in rats using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporo Int 5:47-53.
2. 2. Wu DD, Boyd RD, Fix TJ, Burr DB. 1990 Regional patterns of bone loss and altered bone remodeling in response to calcium deprivation in laboratory rabbits. Calcif Tissue Int 47:18-23.
3. 3. Seeman E. 1998 Editorial: growth in bone mass and size -are racial and gender differences in bone mineral density more apparent than real? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:1414-1419.
4. 4. Newman E, Turner AS, Wark JD. 1995 The potential of sheep for the study of ostepenia: current status and comparison with other animal models. Bone 4(Suppl):277S-284S.
5. 5. Keenan MJ, Hegsted M, Jones KI, et al. 1997 Comparison of bone density measurement techniques: DXA and Archimedes' principle. J Bone Miner Res 12:1903-1907.
6. 6. Sievanen H, Kannus P, Jarvinen M. 1994 Precision of measurement by dual-energy absorptiometry of bone mineral density and content in rat hindlimb in vitro. J Bone Miner Res 9:473-478.
7. 7. Rosenberg S, Vandromme J, Neve J, et al. 1995 Precision and accuracy of in vivo bone mineral measurement in rats using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporosis Int 5:47-53.
8. 8. Pitcher T, Buffenstein R. 1994 Passive uptake in the small intestine and active uptake in the hindgut contribute to the highly efficient mineral metabolism of the common mole rat, Cryptomys hottentotus. Br J Nutr 71:573-582.
9. 9. Sato M, Kim J, Short LL, Slemenda CW, Bryant HU. 1995 Longitudinal and cross-section analysis of raloxifene effects on tibiae from ovariectomised aged rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 272:1252-1259.
10. 10. Glantz SA. 1992 In Primer of Biostatistics. Jeffers JD, Englis MR, eds. Linear regression analysis. McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 67-110.
11. 11. Sato M. 1995 Comparative x-ray densitometry of bones from ovariectomized rats. Bone 17:157S-162S
12. 12. Griffiths MR, Noakes KA, Pocock NA. 1997 Correcting the magnification error of fan beam densitometers. J Bone Miner Res 12:119-123.
13. 13. Eiken P, Barenholdt O, Bjorn Jensen L. Gram J, Pors Nielsen S. 1994 Switching from DXA pencil-beam to fan-beam. Studies in vitro at four centres. Bone 15:667-670.
14. 14. Blake GM, Fogelman I. 1997 Technical principles of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Semin Nucl Med 27:210-228.
15. 15. Faulkner KG, Gluer CC, Estilo, M, Genant HK. 1993 Cross-calibration of DXA equipment: upgrading from a Hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000. Calcif Tissue Int 52:79-84.
16. 16. Abrahamsen B, Gram J, Hansen TB, Beck Nielsen H. 1995 Cross-calibration of QDR-2000 and QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray densitometers for bone mineral and soft-tissue measurements. Bone 16:385-390.