A prospective study of patient-physician communication about resuscitation

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Volumn 48, Issue S1, 2000, Pages S52-S60

  Golin, Carol E ^a   Wenger, Neil S ^a   Liu, Honghu ^a   Dawson, Neal V ^b   Teno, Joan M ^c   Desbiens, Norman A ^d   Lynn, Joanne ^e   Oye, Robert K ^a   Phillips, Russell S ^f  

^a UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA   (United States)

^e GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

advance directives; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; doctor patient communication; terminal care

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESUSCITATION; TERMINAL CARE;

CLINICAL APPROACH/SOURCE; DEATH AND EUTHANASIA; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

AGED; CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESUSCITATION ORDERS; SOCIAL CLASS;

EID: 0034098750     PISSN: 00028614     EISSN: 15325415     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03141.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Blackhall LJ, Cobb J, Moskowitz MA,. Discussions regarding aggressive care with critically ill patients. J Gen Intern Med 1989; 4: 399-402.
2. Ventres W,Nicter M, Reed R, Frankel R,. Do-not-resuscitate discussions: A qualitative analysis. Fam Pract Res J 1992; 12: 157-169.
3. Hofmann JC, Wenger NS, Davis RB, et al,. Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127: 1-12.
4. Amchin J, Perry S, Manevitz A, et al,. Interview assessment of critically ill patients regarding resuscitation decisions: A case study in ethics research. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1989; 11: 103-1108.
5. Bedell SE, Delbanco TL,. Choices about cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital: When do physicians talk with patients N Engl J Med 1984; 310: 1089-1093.
6. Wachter R, Luce J, Hearst N, Lo B,. Decisions about resuscitation: Inequities among patients with different diseases but similar prognoses. Ann Intern Med 1989; 11: 525-532.
7. Hakim RB, Teno JM, Harrell FE Jr, et al,. Factors associated with do-not-resuscitate orders: Patients' preferences, prognoses, and physicians' judgments. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125: 284-293.
8. Starr TJ, Pearlman RA, Uhlman RF,. Quality of life and resuscitation decisions in elderly patients. J Gen Intern Med 1986; 1: 373-379.
9. Teno JM, Hakim RB, Knaus WA, et al,. Preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Physician-patient agreement and hospital resource use. J Gen Intern Med 1995; 10: 179-186.
10. The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study of understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA 1995; 274: 1591-1598.
11. Knaus WA, Harrell FE Jr, Lynn J, et al,. The SUPPORT prognostic model. Objective estimates of survival for seriously ill hospitalized adults. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122: 191-203.
12. Krantz D, Baum A, Wideman M,. Assessment of preferences for self-treatment and information in health care. J Pers Soc Psych 1980; 39: 977-990.
13. Murphy DJ, Knaus WA, Lynn J,. Study population in SUPPORT: Patients (as defined by disease category and mortality projections), surrogates, and physicians. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43 (Suppl): 11-28S.
14. Wu AW, Damiano AM, Lynn J, et al,. Predicting future functional status for seriously ill hospitalized adults. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122: 342-350.
15. Uhlman R, Pearlman R,. Perceived quality of life and preferences for life-sustaining treatment in older adults. Arch Intern Med 1991; 15: 495-497.
16. Danis M, Garrett J, Harris R, Patrick DL,. Stability of choices about life-sustaining treatments. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120: 567-573.
17. Rosenfeld KE, Wenger NS, Phillips RS, et al,. Factors associated with change in resuscitation preference of seriously ill patients. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 1558-1564.
18. The Hastings Center. Guidelines on the termination of life-sustaining treatment and the care of the dying. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987, pp 133-135.
19. Beisecker A, Beisecker TD,. Patients information-seeking behaviors when communicating with doctors. Med Care 1990; 28: 19-28.
20. Blanchard C,. Information and participation preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 1988; 27: 1139-1145.
21. Cassileth B,. Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med 1980; 92: 832-836.
22. Golin C, DiMatteo MR, Gelberg L,. The role of patient participation in the doctor visit: Implications for adherence to diabetes care. Diabetes Care 1996; 19: 1153-1164.
23. Forrow L,. The Green Eggs and Ham Phenomena. Hast Cent Rep 1994; 24 (Suppl): S29-32.
24. Silverman HJ, Tuma P, Schaeffer MH, Singh B,. Implementation of the patient self-determination act in a hospital setting. An initial evaluation. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155: 502-510.
25. Teno JM, Lynn J, Phillips RS, et al,. Do formal advance directives affect resuscitation decisions and the use of resources for seriously ill patients J Clin Ethics 1994; 5: 23-30.
26. Lynn J, Teno JM,. After the Patient Self-determination Act. The need for empirical research on formal advance directives. Hastings Cent Rep 1993; 23: 20-24.
27. Sugarman J, Powe NR, Brillantes D, Smith MK,. The cost of ethics legislation: A look at the Patient Self-Determination Act. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1993; 3: 387-400.
28. Landry FJ, Kroenke K, Lucas C, Reeder J,. Increasing the use of advance directives in medical outpatients. J Gen Intern Med 1997; 12: 412-415.