Treatment outcome expectancies and hypnotic susceptibility as moderators of pain reduction in patients with chronic tension-type headache

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 290-305

  Spinhoven, Philip ^a   Ter Kuile, Moniek M ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; CHRONIC PAIN; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYPNOSIS; HYPNOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; TENSION HEADACHE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AUTOGENIC TRAINING; AUTOSUGGESTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPNOSIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); SUGGESTION; TENSION-TYPE HEADACHE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0034095820     PISSN: 00207144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207140008415247     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Andreychuck, T., & Skriver, C. (1975). Hypnosis and biofeedback in the treatment of migraine headaches. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 23, 172-183.
2. Arrindell, W. A., & Ettema, H. (1986). SCL-90; Handleiding bij een multidimensionele psychopathologie-indicator [Manual for a multi-dimensional psychopathology-indicator]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger B.V.
3. Blanchard, E. B., Andrasik, F., Evans, D. D., Neff, D. F., Appelbaum, K. A., & Rodichok, L. D. (1985). Behavioral treatment of 250 chronic headache patients: A clinical replication series. Behavior Therapy, 16, 308-327.
4. Bogaards, M. C., & ter Kuile, M. M. (1994). Treatment of recurrent tension headache: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Journal of Pain, 10, 174-190.
5. Chaves, J. F. (1994). Recent advances in the application of hypnosis to pain management. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 37, 117-129.
6. Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., & Covi, L. (1973). An outpatient psychiatric rating scale: Preliminary report. Psychopharmacological Bulletin, 9, 13-27.
7. Evans, F. J. (1989). The hypnotizable patient. In D. Waxman, D. Pedersen, I. Wilkie, & P. Mellett (Eds.), Hypnosis: The Fourth European Congress at Oxford (pp. 12-28). London: Whurr.
8. Evans, F. J. (1991). Hypnotizability: Individual differences in dissociation and the flexible control of psychological processes. In S. J. Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), Theories of hypnosis: Current models and perspectives (pp. 144-168). New York: Guilford.
9. Frankel, F. H. (1978). Scales measuring hypnotic responsivity: A clinical perspective. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 21, 208-218.
10. Garfield, S. L. (1994). Research on client variables in psychotherapy. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change (4th ed., pp. 190-228). New York: John Wiley.
11. Goudh, H. G. (1964). Manual for the California Psychological Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
12. Hilgard, E. R. (1986). Divided consciousness: Multiple controls in human thought and action (Expanded ed.). New York: John Wiley.
13. Hilgard, E. R. (1991). A neodissociation interpretation of hypnosis. In S. J. Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), Theories of hypnosis: Current models and perspectives (pp. 83-104). New York: Guilford.
14. Hilgard, E. R., & Hilgard, J. R. (1994). Hypnosis in the relief of pain (Rev. ed.). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
15. Holroyd, J. (1996). Hypnosis treatment of clinical pain: Understanding why hypnosis is useful. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 44, 33-51.
16. Horne, R. L., Evans, F. J., & Orne, M. T. (1982). Random number generation, psychopathology, and therapeutic change. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 680-683.
17. Luteijn, F., Starren, J., & van Dijk, H. (1985). Nederlandse persoonlijkheids vragenlijst (Herziene uitgave) [Dutch Personality Questionnaire (Rev. ed.)]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger B. V.
18. Morgan, A. H., & Hilgard, J. R. (1978/1979). The Stanford hypnotic clinical scale for adults. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 21, 134-147.
19. Nace, E. P., Warwick, A. M., Kelley, R. L., & Evans, F. J. (1982). Hypnotizability and outcome in brief psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 43, 129-133.
20. Oyen, F., & Spinhoven, P. (1983). De Nederlandse bewerking van de Stanford hypnotic clinical scale (SHCS) [The Dutch version of the Stanford Hypnotic Clinical Scale (SHCS)]. Kwartaalschrift voor Directieve Therapie en Hypnose, 2, 155-172.
21. Piccione, C., Hilgard, E. R., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1989). On the degree of stability of measured hypnotizability over a 25-year period. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 289-295.
22. Sheehan, P. W., & McConkey, K. (1982). Hypnosis and experience: The exploration of phenomena and process. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Spanos, N. P. (1991). Hypnosis, hypnotizability, and hypnotherapy. In C. R. Snyder & D. R. Forsyth (Eds.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology: The health perspective (pp. 644-663). New York: Pergamon.
24. Spanos, N. P., Hodgins, D. C., Stam, H. T., & Gwynn, M. I. (1984). Suffering for science: The effects of implicit social demands on response to experimentally induced pain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1162-1172.
25. Spanos, N. P., Kennedy, S. K., & Gwynn, M. I. (1984). Moderating effects of contextual variables on the relationship between hypnotic susceptibility and suggested analgesia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 285-294.
26. Spinhoven, P. (1988). Similarities and dissimilarities in hypnotic and nonhypnotic procedures for headache control: A review. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 30, 183-194.
27. Spinhoven, P. (1990). The clinical relevance of hypnotic susceptibility. In M. L. Fass & D. Brown (Eds.), Creative mastery in hypnosis and hypnoanalysis: A Festschrift for Erika Fromm (pp. 107-124). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Spinhoven, P., Linssen, A. C. G., Van Dyck, R., & Zitman, F. G. (1990). Locus of control, cognitive strategies, and hypnotizability in pain management. In R. Van Dyck, P. Spinhoven, A. J. W. van der Does, Y. R. van Rood, & W. de Moor (Eds.), Hypnosis: Current theory, research, and practice (pp. 189-197). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: VU University Press.
29. Spinhoven, P., Linssen, A. C. G., Van Dyck, R., & Zitman, F. G. (1992). Autogenic training and self-hypnosis in the control of tension headache. General Hospital Psychiatry, 14, 408-415.
30. Tan, S.-Y., & Leucht, C. A. (1997). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for clinical pain control: A 15-year update and its relationship to hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 45, 396-416.
31. ter Kuile, M. M., Spinhoven, P., & Linssen, A. C. G. (1995). Responders and nonresponders to autogenic training and cognitive self-hypnosis: Prediction of short-and long-term success in tension-type headache patients. Headache, 35, 630-636.
32. ter Kuile, M. M., Spinhoven, P., Linssen, A. C. G., & van Houwelingen, H. C. (1996). Cognitive coping and appraisal processes in the treatment of chronic headaches. Pain, 64, 257-264.
33. ter Kuile, M. M., Spinhoven, P., Linssen, A. C. G., Zitman, F. G., Van Dyck, R., & Rooijmans, H. G. M. (1994). Autogenic training and cognitive self-hypnosis for the treatment of recurrent headaches in lhree different subject groups. Pain, 58, 331-340.
34. Van Dyck, R., Zitman, F. G., Linssen, A. C. G., & Spinhoven, P. (1991). Autogenic training and future-oriented hypnotic imagery in the treatment of tension headache: Outcome and process. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 39, 6-23.
35. Weisenberg, M. (1998). Cognitive aspects of pain and pain control. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 46, 44-61.
36. Wilkins, W. (1979). Expectancies in therapy research: Discriminating among heterogeneous nonspecifics. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 837-845.
37. Zitman, F. G., Van Dyck, R., Spinhoven, P., & Linssen, A. C. G. (1992). Hypnosis and autogenic training in the treatment of tension headaches: A two-phase constructive design study with follow-up. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 36, 219-228.