The effect of tail streamer length on aerodynamic performance in the barn swallow

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 228-238

  Buchanan, Katherine L ^a   Evans, Matthew R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Barn swallows; Flight performance; Hirundo rustica; Maneuverability; Natural selection; Norberg mechanism; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; FLIGHT ACTIVITY; PASSERINE; TAIL FEATHER;

HIRUNDINIDAE; HIRUNDO RUSTICA; PASSERIFORMES;

EID: 0034090562     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/11.2.228     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Andersson M, 1982. Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299:818-820.
2. Andersson M, 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
3. Balmford A, Thomas ALR, Jones IL, 1993. Aerodynamics and the evolution of long tails in birds. Nature 361:628-630.
4. Barbosa A, Møller AP, 1999. Aerodynamic costs of long tails in male barn swallows Hirundo rustica and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Behav Ecol 10:128-135.
5. Darwin C, 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.
6. de Lope F, Møller AP, 1993. Female reproductive effort depends on the degree of ornamentation of their mates. Evolution 47:1152-1160.
7. Evans MR, 1998. Selection on swallow tail streamers. Nature 394:233-234.
8. Evans MR, 1999. Length of tail streamers in barn swallows - reply. Nature 397:115-116.
9. Evans MR, Hatchwell BJ, 1992. An experimental study of male adornment in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird. II. The role of the elongated tail in mate choice and experimental evidence for a handicap. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:421-427.
10. Evans MR, Thomas ALR, 1992. The aerodynamic and mechanical effects of elongated tails in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird-measuring the cost of a handicap. Anim Behav 43:337-347.
11. Evans MR, Thomas ALR, 1997. Testing the functional significance of tail streamers. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:211-217.
12. Fisher RA, 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
13. Grafen A, 1990. Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. J Theor Biol 144:473-516.
14. Hedenström A, 1995. Swallows unhandicapped by long tails? Trends Ecol Evol 10:140-141.
15. Hedenström A, Møller AP, 1999. Length of tail streamers in barn swallows. Nature 397:115.
16. Lessells CM, Boag PT, 1987. Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104:116-121.
17. Møller AP, 1988. Female choice selects for male sexual tail ornaments in the monogamous swallow. Nature 332:640-642.
18. Møller AP, 1989. Viability costs of male tail ornaments in a swallow. Nature 339:132-135.
19. Møller AP, 1990. Effects of a haematophagous mite on the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica): a test of the Hamilton and Zuk hypothesis. Evolution 44:771-784.
20. Møller AP, 1991. Sexual selection in the monogamous barn swallow (Hirundo rustica). I. Determinants of tail ornament size. Evolution 45:1823-36.
21. Møller AP, 1993. Sexual selection in the barn swallow Hirundo rustica III. Female tail ornaments. Evolution 47:417-431.
22. Møller AP, 1994. Sexual selection and the barn swallow. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Møller AP, Barbosa A, Cuervo JJ, de Lope F, Merino S, Saino N, 1998. Sexual selection and tail streamers in the barn swallow. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:409-414.
24. Møller AP, de Lope F, 1994. Differential costs of a secondary sexual character: an experimental test of the handicap principle. Evolution 48:1676-1683.
25. Møller AP, Magnhagen C, Ulfstrand A, Ulfstrand S, 1995. Phenotypic quality and molt in the barn swallow, Hirundo rustica. Behav Ecol 6:242-249.
26. Møller AP, Neilsen JT, 1997. Differential predation costs of a secondary sexual character: sparrowhawk predation on barn swallows. Anim Behav 54:1545-1551.
27. Norberg RA, 1994. Swallow tail streamer is a mechanical device for self-deflection of tail leading edge, enhancing aerodynamic efficiency and flight manoeuvrability. Proc R Soc Lond B 257:227-233.
28. Pomiankowski A, Iwasa Y, Nee S, 1991. The evolution of costly mate preferences. 1. Fisher and biased mutation. Evolution 45:1422-1430.
29. Rayner JMV, Aldridge HDJN, 1985. Three-dimensional reconstruction of animal flight paths and the turning flight of microchiropteran bats. J Exp Biol 118:247-265.
30. Saino N, Møller AP, Bolzern AM, 1995. Testosterone effects on the immune system and parasite infestation in the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica): an experimental test of the immunocompetence hypothesis. Behav Ecol 6:397-404.
31. Saino N, Primmer CR, Ellegren H, Møller AP, 1997. An experimental study of paternity and tail ornamentation in the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica). Evolution 51:562-570.
32. Smith HG, Montgomerie R, 1991. Sexual selection and the tail ornaments of North American barn swallows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:195-201.
33. Svensson L, 1992. Identification guide to European passerines, 4th ed. Stockholm: Svensson.
34. Thomas ALR, 1993. On the aerodynamics of birds' tails. Phil Trans R Soc Lond 340:361-380.
35. Thomas ALR, Rowe L, 1997. Experimental tests on tail elongation and sexual selection in swallows (Hirundo rustica) do not affect the tail streamer and cannot test its function. Behav Ecol 8:580-1.