Influence of on-site choices on recreation demand

Leisure Sciences

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 123-132

  Siderelis, Christos ^a   Gustke, Larry ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Nested Choice Models; On Site Travel Behavior; Recreation Demand; Travel Cost Method; Zoological Parks

Indexed keywords

DEMAND ANALYSIS; RECREATIONAL MANAGEMENT; ZOO;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034086950     PISSN: 01490400     EISSN: 15210588     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/014904000272894     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bockstael, N. E., McConnell, K. E., & Strand, I. E. (1989). A random utility model for sport. shing: Some preliminary results for Florida. Marine Resource Economics, 6, 245–260.
2. Chase, D., & Godbey, G. (1983). Research note: The accuracy of self-reported participation rates. Leisure Studies, 2, 231–235.
3. Creel, M. D., & Loomis, J. B. (1990). Theoretical and empirical advantages of truncated count data estimators for analysis of deer hunting in California. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72, 434–441.
4. Feather, P., Hellerstein, D., & Tomasi, T. (1995). Adiscrete-count model of recreation demand. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29, 214–227.
5. Fletcher, J. J., Adamowicz, W. L., & Tomasi, T. (1990). The travel cost model of recreation demand: Theoretical and empirical issues. Journal of Leisure Sciences, 12, 119–147.
6. Freeman, A. M. (1993). The measurement of environmental and resource values: Theory and methods. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
7. Greene, W. H. (1993). Econometric analysis. New York: MacMillan.
8. Greene, W. H. (1995). LIMDEP [Computer software]. New York: Econometric Software.
9. Haab, T. C., & McConnell, K. E. (1996). Count data models and the problem of zeros in recreation demand analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78, 89–102.
10. Hausman, J. A., Leonard, G. K., & McFadden, D. (1995). A utility consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model. Journal of Public Economics, 56, 1–30.
11. Hellerstein, D. (1992). The treatment of nonparticipants in travel cost analysis and other demand models. Water Resources Research, 28, 1999–2004.
12. Hensher, D. A., & Johnson, L. W. (1981). Applied discrete-choice modeling. New York: Halsted Press.
13. Hof, J. G., & Rosenthal, D. H. (1987). Valuing the opportunity cost of travel time in recreation demand models: An application to aggregate data. Journal of Leisure Research, 19, 174–188.
14. Lin, Y., Peterson, G. L., & Rogerson, P. A. (1988). A nested urban recreation site choice model. Leisure Sciences, 10, 1–15.
15. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Advanced Quantitative Techniques 7. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.
16. McConnell, K. E. (1992). On-site time in the demand for recreation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 918–926.
17. Mendelsohn, R., Hof, J., Peterson, G., & Johnson, R. (1992). Measuring recreation values with multiple destination trips. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74, 926–933.
18. Parson, G. R., & Kealy, J. M. (1995). A demand theory for the number of trips in a random utility model of recreation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29, 357–367.
19. Parson, G. R., & Wilson, A. J. (1997). Incidental and joint consumption in recreation demand. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, April, 1–6.
20. Smith, V. K. (1989). Taking stock of progress with travel cost recreation demand methods: Theory and implementation. Marine Resource Economics, 6, 279–310.
21. Smith, V. K., Desvousges, H., & McGivney, M. P. (1983). The opportunity cost of travel time in recreation demand models. Land Economics, 59, 259–278.
22. Stata (Version 6) [computer software and manuals]. (1999). College Station, TX: Stata.
23. Zhang, J., & Hoffman, S. D. (1993). Discrete-choice logit models: Testing the IIA property. Sociological Methods & Research, 22, 193–213.