Reasons for improper simple hysterectomy in patients with invasive cervical cancer in the Northern Region of Thailand

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 175-180

  Srisomboon, Jatupol ^a,b   Pantusart, Aree ^a   Phongnarisorn, Chailert ^a   Suprasert, Prapaporn ^a  

^a Faculty of Medicine Chiang Mai University   (Thailand)

^b CHIANG MAI UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Simple hysterectomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; CURETTAGE; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; THAILAND; TREATMENT FAILURE; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; UTERINE CERVIX DYSPLASIA; VAGINA BLEEDING;

EID: 0034084371     PISSN: 13418076     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2000.tb01307.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Vatanasapt V, Martin N, Sriplung H. Cancer in Thailand. Lyon, France IARC Technical Report No. 16, 1993
2. Heller PB, Bamhill DR, Mayer AR, Fontaine TP, Hoskins WJ, Park RC. Cervical carcinoma found incidentally in a uterus removed for benign conditions. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 187-190
3. Hopkins MP, Peters WA III, Anderson W, Morley GW. Invasive cervical cancer treated initially by standard hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 1990; 36: 7-12
4. Orr JW Jr, Ball GC, Soong SJ, Hatch KD, Partridge EE, Austin JM. Surgical treatment of women found to have invasive cervix cancer at the time of total hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 353-356
5. Andras EJ, Fletcher GH, Rutledge F. Radiotherapy of carcinoma of the cervix following simple hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973; 115: 647-655
6. Davy M, Bentzen H, Jahren R. Simple hysterectomy in the presence of invasive cervical cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1977; 50: 105-108
7. Papavisilou C, Yiagarakis D, Pappas J, Keramopoulos A. Treatment of cervix carcinoma by simple hysterectomy and postoperative external irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1980; 6: 871-874
8. Perkins PL, Chu AM, Jose B, Achino E, Tobin DA. Posthysterectomy megavoltage irradiation in the treatment of cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1984; 17: 340-348
9. Roman LD, Morris M, Mitchell MF, Eifel PJ, Burke TW, Atkinson EN. Prognostic factors for patients undergoing simple hysterectomy in the presence of invasive cancer of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1993; 50: 170-184
10. Green TH, Morse WJ. Management of invasive cervical cancer following inadvertent simple hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1969; 33: 763-769
11. Barber HRK, Pece GV, Brunchwig A. Operative management of patients previously operated upon for a benign lesion with cervical cancer as a surprise finding. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1968; 101 959-965
12. Roman LD, Morris M, Eifel PJ, Burke TW, Gershenson DM, Wharton JT. Reasons for inappropriate simple hysterectomy in the presence of invasive cancer of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 485-489
13. Tawa K, Forsythe A, Cove K, Saltz A, Peters HW, Watring WG. A comparison of the Papanicolaou smear and the cervigram: Sensitivity, specificity, and cost analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 229-235
14. Townsend DE, Richart RM. Diagnostic errors in colposcopy. Gynecol Oncol 1981; 12: S259-S264
15. Benedet JL, Anderson GJ, Boyes DA. Colposcopic accuracy in the diagnosis of microinvasive and occult invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65: 557-562
16. Koss LG. The Papanicolaou test for cervical cancer detection. A triumph and a tragedy. JAMA 1989; 261: 734-743
17. Van der Graaf Y, Vooijs GP. False negative rate in cervical cytology. J Clin Pathol 1987; 40: 438-442
18. Gay JD, Donaldson LD, Goellner JR. False-negative results in cervical cytologic studies. Acta Cytal 1985; 29: 1043-1046
19. Hamblin JE, Brock CD, Litchfield L, Dias L. Papanicolaou smear adequacy: Effect of different techniques in specific fertility states. J Fam Pract 1985; 3: 257-260
20. Boon M, de Graaff-Guillond J, Rietved W. Analysis of five sampling of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears. Acta Cytol 1989; 33: 843-848