Adherence to the guidelines of a regional formulary

Family Practice

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 254-260

  Kamps, G B ^a   Stewart, R E ^a   Van Der Werf, G Th ^a   Schuling, J ^a   Meyboom de Jong, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Family physicians; Formularies; Guidelines adherence; Practice guidelines

Indexed keywords

ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT; PAROXETINE; TRICYCLIC ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT;

ARTICLE; DRUG COST; DRUG FORMULARY; DRUG THERAPY; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRESCRIPTION; TREATMENT INDICATION;

EID: 0034084235     PISSN: 02632136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/17.3.254     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Grol R. National standard setting for quality of care in general practice: attitudes of general practitioners and reponse to a set of standards. BrJ Gen Pract 1990; 40: 361-364.
2. Giuffrida A, Gravelle H, Roland M. Measuring quality of care with routine data: avoiding confusion between performance indicators and health outcomes. Br Med J 1999; 319: 94-98.
3. West E, Newton J. Clinical guidelines. Br Mad J 1997; 315: 324.
4. Baker R, Fraser RC. Development of review criteria: linking guidelines and assessment of quality. Br Med J 1995; 311: 370-373.
5. Barber N. What constitutes good prescribing? Br Med J 1995; 310: 923-925.
6. Parish PA. Drug prescribing - the concern of all. J R Society Health 1973; 4: 213-217.
7. WHO Conference of Experts on the Rational Use of Drugs, Nairobi. Geneva: WHO, 1987.
8. Rucker TD, Schiff G. Drug formularies. Myths-in-formation. Med Care 1990; 28: 928-942.
9. Kamps GB, Meyboom-de Jong. Regionale formularia voor huisartsen vergeleken (Regional formularies for GPs compared). Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1997; 141: 1002-1007.
10. Grant GB, Gregory DA, van Zwanenberg TDA. Basis Formulary in General Practice. Practical Guidelines for General Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
11. Bergman U, Popa C, Tomson V, Wettermark B. Einarson TR, Aberg H, Sjoqvist F. Drug utilization 90% - a simple method for assessing the quality of drugs prescribing. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 54: 113-118.
12. Werf GTh van der, Smith RJA, Stewart RE, Meyboom-de Jong B. Spiegel op de huisarts; over registratie van ziekte, medicatie en verwijzingen in de geautomatiseerde huisartspraktijk. Disciplinegroep huisartsgeneeskunde, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, 1998.
13. Wieringa N, Graeff P de, Werf GTh van der, Vos R. Cardiovascular drugs: discrepancies in demographics between pre- and post-registration use. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1999 55: 537-544.
14. Althuis TP. Nut III, een studie naar automatisering van Nederlandse huisartsen 1997 in (A survey of automatization of Dutch General Practitioners in 1997). Utrecht: NHG (Dutch College of General Practitioners), 1999.
15. Lamberts H, Wood M. International Classification of Primary Care. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, 1987.
16. Guidelines for ATC Classification and DDD Assignment. Oslo: WHO Collaboration Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, 1995.
17. Gronlnger Formularium, 3rd edn. Groningen: Stichting Farmaceutische Dienstverlening, 1995.
18. Grol R. Implementing guidelines in general practice care. Qual Health Care 1997; 1: 184-191.
19. Kamps GB, Meyboom de Jong B. Voorschrijven volgens de regels. Compliantie van jtwee groepen huisartsen met hun regionale formularia. (Prescribing according to guidelines. Adherence of two groups of GPs to their own regional formulary.) Huisarts Wet 1998; 41: 416-420.
20. Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, Veld C in't, Rutten G, Mokkink H. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. Br Med J 1998; 317: 858-861.