The status of psychoanalytic theory today: There is an elephant there

Psychoanalytic Psychology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 174-179

  Frank, George ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTORY OF MEDICINE; HUMAN; HUMANITIES; PERSONALITY; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY; REVIEW;

EID: 0034078290     PISSN: 07369735     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0736-9735.17.1.174     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Abrams, S. (1989). Ambiguity in excess: An obstacle to common ground. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 70, 3-7.
2. Appy, G. (1989). Where does common ground among psychoanalysts end? International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 70, 7-11.
3. Aslan, C. M. (1989). Common ground in psychoanalysis: Aims and clinical process. As I see it. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 70, 12-16.
4. Baudry, F. (1982). A silent partner to our practice: The analyst's character and attitudes. Bulletin of the Association of Psychoanalytic Medicine, 21, 100-109.
5. Baudry, F. (1990). The relevance of the analyst's character and attitudes to his work. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 39, 917-938.
6. Etchegoyen, R. H. (1993). Psychoanalysis today and tomorrow. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 74, 1109-1115.
7. Feldman, M. (1990). Common ground: The centrality of the Oedipus complex. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71, 37-48.
8. Figueira, S. A. (1990). Common (under)ground in psychoanalysis: The question of a Weltanschauung revisited. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71, 65-75.
9. Frank, G. (1998a). The intersubjective school of psychoanalysis: Concerns and questions. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 15, 420-423.
10. Frank, G. (1998b). On the relational school of psychoanalysis: Some additional thoughts. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 15, 141-153.
11. Frank, G. (1998c). The psychoanalytic process: The search for common ground. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 15, 297-304.
12. Freud, A. (1954). The widening scope of indications for psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 2, 607-620.
13. Gedo, J. E. (1984). Psychoanalysis and its discontents. New York: Guilford Press.
14. Gedo, J. E. (1986). Conceptual issues in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
15. Glover, E. (1955). Technique of psycho-analysis. New York: International Universities Press.
16. Goldberg, A. (1989). A shared view of the world. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 70, 16-20.
17. Hernandez, M. (1990). Common ground: An analytic break and its consequences. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71, 21-29.
18. Jacobson, E. (1964). The self and the object world. New York: International Universities Press.
19. Kantrowitz, J. (1986). The role of the patient-analyst match in the outcome of psychoanalysis. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 14, 273-297.
20. Kernberg, O. F. (1982). Self, ego, affects, and drives. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 30, 893-918.
21. King, P., & Steiner, R. (Eds.). (1991). The Freud-Klein controversies, 1941-1945. London: Routledge.
22. Knight, R. P. (1953). The present status of organized psychoanalysis in the United States. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 1, 197-221.
23. Lussier, A. (1991). The search for common ground: A critique. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 72, 57-62.
24. Nunes, E. P. (1989). Common ground in psychoanalysis: Clinical aims and process as I see it. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 70, 24-28.
25. Pine, F. (1990). Drive, ego, object, & self: A synthesis for clinical work. New York: Basic Books.
26. Rangell, L. (1974). A psychoanalytic perspective leading currently to the syndrome of the compromise of integrity. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 55, 3-12.
27. Rangell, L. (1988). The future of psychoanalysis: The scientific crossroads. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 57, 313-340.
28. Richards, A. D. (1990). The future of psychoanalysis: The past, present, and future of psychoanalytic theory. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 59, 347-369.
29. Schafer, R. (1990). The search for common ground. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71, 49-52.
30. Schwaber, E. A. (1990). The psychoanalyst's methodological stance: Some comments based on a response to Max Hernandez. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77, 31-36.
31. Spruiell, V. (1988). The indivisibility of Freudian object relations and drive theories. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 57, 597-625.
32. Stolorow, R. D., & Atwood, G. E. (1979). Faces in a cloud: Subjectivity in personality theory. New York: Jason Aronson.
33. Treurniet, N. (1993). What is psychoanalysis now? International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 74, 873-891.
34. Wallerstein, R. S. (1988). One psychoanalysis or many? International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 69, 5-21.
35. Wallerstein, R. S. (1990). Psychoanalysis: The common ground. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71, 3-20.