Embryonic quail eye development in microgravity

Journal of Applied Physiology

Volumn 88, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 1614-1622

  Barrett, Joyce E ^a   Wells, Diane C ^a   Paulsen, Avelina Q ^a   Conrad, Gary W ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cornea; Immunohistochemistry; Neurofilament; Spaceflight; Ultrastructure

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL ULTRASTRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA OPACITY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EYE DEVELOPMENT; MICROGRAVITY; NONHUMAN; ORGAN SIZE; ORGAN WEIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUAIL; SENSORY NERVE;

EID: 0034077995     PISSN: 87507587     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2000.88.5.1614     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Barrett JE, Wells DC, and Conrad GW. Pretreatment methods to improve nerve immunostaining in corneas from long-term fixed embryonic quail eyes. J Neurosci Methods 92: 161-168, 1999.
2. Beckenhauer DM and Conrad GW. The effect of thyroxine on transparency and PAPS synthesis in the avian cornea. Dev Biol 84: 225-229, 1981.
3. Bee JA. The development and pattern of innervation of the avian cornea. Dev Biol 92: 5-15, 1982.
4. Conrad GW. Collagen and mucopolysaccharide biosynthesis in the developing chick cornea. Dev Biol 21: 292-317, 1970.
5. Coulombre AJ. The role of intraocular pressure in the development of the chick eye. I. Control of eye size. J Exp Zool 133: 211-225, 1956.
6. Coulombre AJ. The role of intraocular pressure in the development of the chick eye. II. Control of corneal size. Arch Ophthalmol 57: 250-253, 1957.
7. Coulombre AJ and Coulombre JL. The role of intraocular pressure in the development of the chick eye. III. Ciliary body. Am J Ophthalmol 44: 85-92, 1957.
8. Coulombre AJ and Coulombre JL. The role of intraocular pressure in the development of the chick eye. IV. Corneal curvature. Arch Ophthalmol 59: 502-506, 1958.
9. Coulombre AJ and Coulombre JL. Corneal development. III. The role of the thyroid in dehydration and the development of transparency. Exp Eye Res 3: 105-114, 1964.
10. Coulombre AJ and Coulombre JL. The skeleton of the eye. II. Overlap of the scierai ossicles of the domestic fowl. Dev Biol 33: 257-267, 1973.
11. Coulombre AJ, Coulombre JL, and Mehta H. The skeleton of the eye. I. Conjunctival papillae and scleral ossicles. Dev Biol 5: 382-401, 1962.
12. Deeming DC. Characteristics of unturned eggs: critical period, retarded embryonic growth and poor albumen utilization. Br Poult Sci 30: 239-249, 1989.
13. Deeming DC. Failure to turn eggs during incubation: development of the area vasculosa and embryonic growth. J Morphol 201: 179-186, 1989.
14. Funderburgh JL, Caterson B, and Conrad GW. Keratan sulfate proteoglycan during embryonic development of the chicken cornea. Dev Biol 116: 267-277, 1986.
15. Guryeva TS, Dadasheva OA, Meleshko GI, Shepelev YeYa, Boda K, and Sabo V. The quail embryonic development under the conditions of weightlessness. Acta Vet Brno 62, Suppl 6: S25-S30, 1993.
16. Hall BK. Specificity in the differentiation and morphogenesis of neural crest-derived scierai ossicles and of epithelial scleral papillae in the eye of the embryonic chick. J Embryol Exp Morph 66: 175-190, 1981.
17. Hart GW. Biosynthesis of glycosaminoglycans by the separated tissues of the embryonic chick cornea. Dev Biol 62: 78-98, 1978.
18. Hester PY, Orban JI, Sabo V, and Boda K. Egg rotation during avian embryogenesis. Folia Veterinaria S42: 67-72, 1998.
19. Hullinger RL. Embryogenesis aboard shuttle STS-29. Acta Vet Brno 62, Suppl 6: S17-S23, 1993.
20. Johnston MC, Noden DM, Hazelton RD, Coulombre JL, and Coulombre AJ. Origins of avian ocular and periocular tissues. Exp Eye Res 29: 27-43, 1979.
21. Koo SJ, Clark-Alderfer JD, Tanaka H, Teillet M-A, Schurler B, Le Douarin NM, and Conrad GW. Species-specific immunostaining of embryonic corneal nerves: techniques for inactivating endogenous peroxidases and demonstration of lateral diffusion of antibodies in the plane of the corneal stroma. J Neurosci Methods 85: 63-71, 1998.
22. Kostal L, Jurani M, Boda K, Shepelev YeYa, Guryeva TS, Sabo V, and Dadasheva OA. Behavior of Japanese quail in microgravity on the Mir orbital station. Acta Vet Brno 62, Suppl 6: S65-S67, 1993.
23. Mader TH. Intraocular pressure in microgravity. J Clin Pharmacol 31: 947-950, 1991.
24. Mader TH, Gibson CR, Caputo M, Hunter N, Taylor G, Charles J, and Meehan RT. Intraocular pressure and retinal vascular changes during transient exposure to microgravity. Am J Ophthalmol 115: 347-350, 1993.
25. Masterson E, Edelhauser HF, and Van Horn DL. Development of corneal transparency in embryonic chick: influence of exogenous thyroxine and thiouracil on structure, water and electrolyte content. Dev Biol 43: 233-239, 1975.
26. Masterson E, Edelhauser HF, and Van Horn DL. The role of thyroid hormone in the development of the chick corneal endothelium and epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 16: 105-115, 1977.
27. National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington, DC: National Academy, 1996.
28. Palmoski MJ and Goetinck PF. An analysis of the development of conjunctival papillae and scierai ossicles in the eye of the scaleless mutant. J Exp Zool 174: 157-164, 1970.
29. Philpott DE, Corbett R, Turnbill R, Harrison G, Leaffer D, Black S, Sapp W, Klein G, and Savik LF. Cosmic ray effects of the eyes of rats flown on Cosmos No. 782, experiment K-007. Aviat Space Environ Med 49: 19-28, 1978.
30. Puck TT, Cieciura SJ, and Robinson A. Genetics of somatic mammalian cells. III. Long-term cultivation of euploid cells from human and animal subjects. J Exp Med 108: 945-956, 1958.
31. Suda TE, Abe E, Shinki T, Katagiri T, Yamaguchi A, Yokose S, Yoshiki S, Horikawa H, Cohen GW, Yasugi S, and Naito M. The role of gravity in chick embryogenesis. FEBS Lett 340: 34-38, 1994.
32. Trelstad RL and Coulombre AJ. Morphogenesis of the collagenous stroma in the chick cornea. J Cell Biol 50: 840-858, 1971.
33. Wilson HR. Physiological requirements of the developing embryo: temperature and turning. In: Avian Incubation: Poultry Science Symposium No. 22, edited by Tullet SG. Surrey, UK: Butterworth-Heinenmann, 1991, p. 145-156.