Re-thinking the urban development corporation 'experiment': The case of Central Manchester, Leeds and Bristol

Progress in Planning

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 1-72

  Deas, Iain ^a   Robson, Brian ^a   Bradford, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; PLANNING PRACTICE; URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; URBAN RENEWAL;

BRISTOL; ENGLAND(AVON); ENGLAND(MANCHESTER); ENGLAND(WEST YORKSHIRE); LEEDS; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0034074752     PISSN: 03059006     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0305-9006(00)00007-6     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Bassett K. Partnerships, business elites and urban politics: new forms of governance in an English city? Urban Studies. 33:1996;539-555.
2. A Vision for Bristol. 1989;Bristol Development Corporation, Bristol.
3. Bradford, M., Steward, A., 1988. Inner city refurbishment: an evaluation of private-public partnership schemes, SPA Working Paper 2, School of Geography, University of Manchester, Manchester.
4. Brownhill S. The Docklands experience: locality and community in London. Imrie R., Thomas H. British Urban Policy and the Urban Development Corporations. 1993;Paul Chapman, London.
5. Regenerating London Docklands. 1998;DETR, London.
6. Development Strategy for Central Manchester. 1990;Central Manchester Development Corporation, Manchester.
7. Cochrane A., Peck J., Tickell A. Manchester plays games: exploring the local politics of globalization. Urban Studies. 33:1996;1319-1336.
8. Colenutt, R., 1992. Social Regeneration: Directions for Urban Policy in the 1990s. Centre for Local Economic Strategies, Manchester.
9. Deas, I., Ward, K., 1999. The Song has ended but the Melody Lingers: Regional Development Agencies and the Lessons of the Urban Development Corporation experiment. Local Economy 14, 114-133.
10. Deas, I., Ward, K., 2000. From the new Localism to the new regionalism? The implications of Regional Developmnet Agencies for city-regional relations. Political Geography 19, 55-75.
11. Opportunities: Central Manchester Development Corporation. 1988;ECOTEC, Birmingham.
12. Realising the Potential (Bristol). 1988;ECOTEC, Birmingham.
13. Gyford J. The Politics of Local Socialism. 1985;Allen and Unwin, London.
14. Haughton, G., 1999. Trojan horse or white elephant? The contested biography of the life and times of the Leeds Development Corporation, Town Planning Review 70, 173-190.
15. Imrie, R., Thomas, H., 1999. British Urban Policy: An evaluation of the Urban Development Corporations, 2nd edn., Sage, London.
16. Strategic Plan. 1988;Leeds Development Corporation, Leeds.
17. Corporate Plan. 1989;Leeds Development Corporation, Leeds.
18. Corporate Plan. 1990;Leeds Development Corporation, Leeds.
19. Corporate Plan. 1991;Leeds Development Corporation, Leeds.
20. Made Things Happen 1988-1995. 1995;Leeds Development Corporation, Leeds.
21. Lovatt A. The ecstasy of urban regeneration: regulation of the night-time economy in the transition to a post-Fordist city. O'Connor J., Wynne D. From the Margins to the Centre: Cultural Production and Consumption in the Post-industrial City. 1996;Arena, Aldershot.
22. Office Development in Manchester. 1990;Manchester City Council, Manchester.
23. Office Development in Manchester. 1995;Manchester City Council, Manchester.
24. Mellor R. Cool times for a changing city. Jewson N., MacGregor S. Transforming Cities. 1997;Routledge, London.
25. The Achievements of the Second and Third Generation Urban Development Corporations. 1993;HMSO, London.
26. O'Toole M. Regulation Theory and the British State: The Case of the Urban Development Corporation. 1996;Avebury, Aldershot.
27. Central Manchester Development Corporation Office Study. 1991;CMDC, Manchester.
28. Peck J., Emmerich M. Recession, restructuring ... and recession again: the transformation of the Greater Manchester labour market. Manchester Geographer. 13:1992;19-46.
29. Peck J., Tickell A. Business goes local: dissecting the 'business agenda' in Manchester. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 19:1995;55-78.
30. Pieda. The Potential for Development: A Report by Pieda. 1988;LDC, Leeds.
31. Quilley, S., 1995. Economic Transformation and Local Strategy in Manchester, unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Manchester.
32. Roberts P., Whitney D. The new partnership: inter-agency co-operation and urban policy in Leeds. Imrie R., Thomas H. British Urban Policy and the Urban Development Corporations. 1993;Paul Chapman, London.
33. Robinson F., Lawrence M., Shaw K. More Than Bricks and Mortar? Tyne & Wear and Teesside Development Corporations - A Mid-Term Report. 1993;Department of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Durham, Durham.
34. Robson B. Those Inner Cities: Reconciling the Economic and Social Aims of Urban Policy. 1988;Clarenden Press, Oxford.
35. Robson, B., Deas, I., Bradford, M., 1999. Beyond the boundaries: vacancy chains and the evaluation of Urban Development Corporations, Environment and Planning A 31, 647-664.
36. Robson B., Bradford M., Deas I., Fielder A., Franklin S. The Impact of Urban Development Corporations in Leeds, Bristol and Central Manchester. 1998;DETR, London.
37. Urban Development Corporations: Performance and Good Practice. 1998;DETR, London.
38. Russell H. A Place for the Community? Tyne and Wear Development Corporation's Approach to Regeneration. 1998;The Policy Press, Bristol.
39. Shaw K. Assessing the performance of Urban Development Corporations: how reliable are the official government output measures? Planning Practice and Research. 10:1995;287-298.
40. Trinnanman J. Land, infrastructure and environmental issues, In J Stillwell. Leigh C. Yorkshire and Humberside: Monitoring the Future, Mapping the Past. 1995;Yorkshire and Humberside Regional Research Observatory, Leeds.
41. Turok I., Edge N. The Jobs Gap in Britain's Cities: Employment Loss and Labour Market Consequences. 1999;The Policy Press, Bristol.