Thinking alike: Similarities in attitudes of dutch, Spanish, and american planners

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 34-45

  Kaufman, Jerome L ^a   Escuin, Marta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON; PLANNING PRACTICE;

NETHERLANDS; SPAIN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034072620     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360008976082     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Alterman, R., 1992. A transatlantic view of planning education and planning practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 12:39–54.
2. American Institute of Certified Planners. 1981. AICP Code of ethics and professional conduct., Washington, DC:Author.
3. Argyris, C., and Schon, D., 1981. Theory in practice:Increasing professional effectiveness., San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
4. Arnstein, S., 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35:216–224.
5. Baum, H., 1983. Planners and public expectations., Cambridge, MA:Schenkman.
6. Benveniste, G., 1988. Mastering the politics of planning., San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
7. Burke, E., 1968. Citizen participation strategies. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 34:287–294.
8. Christensen, K., 1993. Teaching savvy. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 12:202–212.
9. Dalton, L., 1989. Emerging knowledge about planning practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 9:29–44.
10. Faludi, A., and Van der Valk, A., 1994. Rule and order:Dutch planning doctrine in the twentieth century., Dordrecht, Netherlands:Kluwer Academic.
11. Flyvberg, B., 1998. Rationality and power:Democracy in action., Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
12. Forester, J., 1989. Planning in the face of power., Berkeley:University of California Press.
13. Healey, P., 1992. A planner's day:Knowledge and action in communicative practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58:9–20.
14. Hoch, C., 1994. What planners do:Power, politics and persuasion., Chicago:Planners Press.
15. Howe, E., 1994. Acting on ethics in city planning, New Brunswick, NJ:Center for Urban Policy Research.
16. Howe, E., and Kaufman, J., 1979. The ethics of contemporary American planners. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45:243–255.
17. Howe, E., and Kaufman, J., 1981. The values of contemporary American planners. Journal of the American Planning Association, 47:266–278.
18. Kaufman, J., 1985. American and Israeli planners:A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of the American Planning Association, 51:352–364.
19. Khakee, A., and Dahlgren, L., 1990. Ethics and values of Swedish planners:A replication and comparison with an American study. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 7:65–81.
20. Lang, R., and Hendler, S., 1990. “ Ethics and professional planners ”. In Moral expertise, Edited by:MacNiven, D., 52–70. London:Routledge.
21. Przeworski, A., and Teune, H., 1970. The logic of comparative social inquiry., New York:Wiley Interscience.