Cochlear microphonics and otoacoustic emissions in chronically de-efferented chinchilla

Hearing Research

Volumn 143, Issue 1-2, 2000, Pages 14-22

  Zheng, Xiang Yang ^a   McFadden, Sandra L ^a   Henderson, Donald ^a   Ding, Da Lian ^a   Burkard, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Acetylcholinesterase; Cochlear efferent; Cochlear microphonic; Inner ear; Non linearity; Otoacoustic emission

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CHINCHILLA; COCHLEA POTENTIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; EAR; NERVE TRANSECTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE; ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHINCHILLA; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR MICROPHONIC POTENTIALS; DENERVATION; EFFERENT PATHWAYS; HAIR CELLS; OLIVARY NUCLEUS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0034069641     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(99)00217-8     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Altshuler, R.A., Raphael, Y., Prosen, C.A., Dolan, D.F. and Moody, D.B., 1992. Acoustic stimulation and overstimulation in the cochlea: A comparison between basal and apical turns of the cochlea. In: Dancer, A.L., Henderson, D., Salvi, R.J. and Hamernik, R.P. (Eds.), Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. Mosby Year Book, St. Louis, MO, pp. 60-72.
2. Ashmore J.F. A fast motile response in guinea-pig outer hair cells: The cellular basis of the cochlear amplifier. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 388:1987;323-347.
3. Bonfils P., Remond M.-C., Pujol R. Variations of cochlear microphonic potential after sectioning efferent fibers to the cochlea. Hear. Res. 30:1987;267-272.
4. Brown M.C. Morphology of labeled efferent fibers in the guinea pig cochlea. Neurology. 260:1987;605-618.
5. Brownell W.E., Bader C.R., Bertrand D., de Ribaupierre Y. Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. Science. 227:1985;194-196.
6. Cooper N.P., Rhode W.S. Basilar membrane mechanics in the hook region of cat and guinea-pig cochleae: sharp tuning and nonlinearity in the absence of baseline position shifts. Hear. Res. 63:1992;163-190.
7. Dallos P., Billone M.C., Durrant J.D., Wang C.Y., Raynor S. Cochlear inner and outer hair cells: Functional differences. Science. 177:1972;356-358.
8. Dallos P., He D.Z., Lin X., Sziklai I., Mehta S., Evans B.N. Acetylcholine, outer hair cell electromotility, and the cochlear amplifier. J. Neurosci. 17:1997;2212-2226.
9. Elgoyhen A.B., Johnson D.S., Boulter J., Vetter D.E., Heinemann S. Alpha 9: an acetylcholine receptor with novel pharmacological properties expressed in rat cochlear hair cells. Cell. 79:1994;705-715.
10. Fex J. Augmentation of the cochlear microphonics by stimulation of efferent fibres to the cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.). 50:1959;540-541.
11. Guinan J.J. Jr., Warr W.B., Norris B.E. Differential olivocochlear projections from lateral versus medial zones of the superior olivary complex. J. Comp. Neurol. 221:1983;358-373.
12. Harel N., Kakigi A., Hirakawa H., Mount R.J., Harrison R.V. The effects of anesthesia on otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 110:1997;25-33.
13. Iurato S., Smith C.A., Eldredge D.H., Henderson D., Carr C., Ueno Y., Cameron S., Richter R. Distribution of the crossed olivocochlear bundle in the chinchilla's cochlea. J. Comp. Neurol. 182:1978;57-76.
14. Jock B.M., Hamernik R.P., Aldrich L.G., Ahroon W.A., Petriello K.L., Johnson A.R. Evoked-potential thresholds and cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the chinchilla following carboplatin treatment and noise exposure. Hear. Res. 96:1996;179-190.
15. Karnovsky M.J., Roots L. A 'direct-coloring' thiocholine method for cholinesterases. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 12:1964;219-221.
16. Katz B., Miledi R. Transmitter leakage from motor nerve endings. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 196:1977;59-72.
17. Khanna S.M., Leonard D.G.B. Basilar membrane tuning in the cat cochlea. Science. 215:1982;305-306.
18. Kujawa S.G., Glattke T.J., Fallon M., Bobbin R.P. Contralateral sound suppresses distortion product otoacoustic emissions through cholinergic mechanisms. Hear. Res. 68:1993;97-106.
19. Liberman M.C. Effects of chronic cochlear de-efferentation on auditory-nerve response. Hear. Res. 49:1990;209-224.
20. Liberman M.C., Brown M.C. Physiology and anatomy of single olivocochlear neurons in the cat. Hear. Res. 24:1986;17-36.
21. Liberman M.C., Puria S., Guinan J.J. Jr. The ipsilaterally evoked olivocochlear reflex causes rapid adaptation of the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99:1996;3572-3584.
22. Mountain D.C. Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alters cochlear mechanics. Science. 210:1980;71-72.
23. Murugasu E., Russell I.J. The effect of efferent stimulation on basilar membrane displacement in the basal turn of the guinea pig cochlea. J. Neurosci. 16:1996;325-332.
24. Patuzzi R., Rajan R. Does electrical stimulation of the crossed olivo-cochlear bundle produce movement of the organ of Corti? Hear. Res. 45:1990;15-32.
25. Patuzzi R.B., Yates G.K., Johnstone B.M. Outer hair cell receptor current and sensorineural hearing loss. Hear. Res. 42:1989;47-72.
26. Puel J.L., Rebillard G. Effect of contralateral sound stimulation on the distortion product 2F1-F2: Evidence that the medial efferent system is involved. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87:1990;1630-1635.
27. Rajan R. Tonic activity of the crossed olivocochlear bundle in guinea pigs with idiopathic losses in auditory sensitivity. Hear. Res. 39:1989;299-308.
28. Rasmussen G. The olivary peduncle and other fiber projections of the superior olivary complex. J. Comp. Neurol. 84:1946;141-219.
29. Robles L., Ruggero M.A., Rich N.C. Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80:1986;1364-1374.
30. Santos-Sacchi J. Asymmetry in voltage-dependent movements of isolated outer hair cells from the organ of Corti. J. Neurosci. 9:1989;2954-2962.
31. Siegel J.H., Kim D.O. Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects biomechanical nonlinearity. Hear. Res. 6:1982;245-248.
32. Sziklai I., Dallos P. Acetylcholine controls the gain of the voltage-to-movement converter in isolated outer hair cells. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.). 113:1993;326-329.
33. Warr, W.B., 1992. Organization of olivocochlear efferent systems in mammals. In: Webster, D.B., Popper, A.N. and Ray, R.R. (Eds.), The Mammalian Auditory Pathway: Neuroanatomy. Springer, New York, pp. 410-448.
34. Wiederhold, M.L., 1986. Physiology of the olivocochlear system. In: Altschuler, R.A., Bobbin, R.P. and Hoffman, D.W. (Eds.), Neurobiology of Hearing: The Cochlea. Raven Press, New York, pp. 349-370.
35. Wiederhold M.L., Peake W.T. Efferent inhibition of auditorty nerve responses: Dependence on acoustic stimulus parameters. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 40:1966;1427-1430.
36. Zheng X.Y., Henderson D., Hu B.H., Ding D.L., McFadden S. The influence of the cochlear efferent system on chronic acoustic trauma. Hear. Res. 107:1997;147-159.
37. Zheng X.Y., Henderson D., McFadden S.L., Ding D.L., Salvi R.J. Auditory nerve fiber responses following chronic cochlear de-efferentation. J. Comp. Neurol. 406:1999;72-86.