No difference between bupivacaine in 0.9% and 8% glucose for spinal anaesthesia in small children

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 548-551

  Kokki, Hannu ^a   Hendolin, H ^a  

^a KUOPIO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Anesthetic local, bupivacaine; Anesthetic techniques, subarachnoid; Children anesthesia, pediatric; Complications, shivering, vomiting; Physics, baricity

Indexed keywords

ATROPINE; BUPIVACAINE; DIAZEPAM; EMLA;

ARTICLE; BRADYCARDIA; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG FORMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PEDIATRIC SURGERY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEDATION; SHIVERING; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; VOMITING;

ANESTHESIA, SPINAL; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; BUPIVACAINE; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; GLUCOSE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0034063804     PISSN: 00015172     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.00510.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. 1. Abajian JC, Mellish RW, Browne AF, Perkins FM, Lambert DH, Mazuzan JE. Spinal anaesthesia for surgery in the high-risk infant. Anesth Analg 1984: 63: 359-362.
2. 2. Wolf AR, Doyle E, Thomas E. Modifying infant stress responses to major surgery: spinal vs extradural vs opioid analgesia. Paediatr Anaesth 1998: 8: 305-311.
3. 3. Bang-Vojdanovski B. 10 Jahre Spinalanästhesie bei Säugligen und Kindern in der orthopädischen Chirurgie. Ein klinischer Erfahrungsbericht. Anaesthetist 1996: 45: 271-257.
4. 4. Kokki H, Tuovinen K, Hendolin H. Spinal anaesthesia for paediatric day-case surgery, a double-blind, randomised, parallel group, prospective comparison of isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth 1998: 81: 502-506.
5. 5. McNicol R. Paediatric regional anaesthesia: an update. In: Lindahl S, ed. Paediatric anaesthesia. London: Bailliere Tindall, 1996: 725-752.
6. 6. Sethna NF, Berde CB. Paediatric regional anaesthesia. In: Gregory GA, ed. Paediatric anaesthesia. New York: Churchill Livingstone Inc., 1994: 281-317.
7. 7. Bannister J, McClure JH, Wildsmith JA. Effect of glucose concentration on the intrathecal spread of 0.5% bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth 1990: 64: 232-234.
8. 8. Berkowitz S, Greene BA. Spinal anaesthesia in children: report based on 350 patients under 13 years of age. Anaesthesiology 1951: 12: 376-387.
9. 9. Bridenbaugh PO, Green NM. Spinal (subarachnoid) neural blockade. In: Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO, ed. Neural blockade in clinical anaesthesia and management of pain. Philadelphia: J B Lippincott, 1988: 213-251.
10. -1 in 0.9% and 8% glucose solutions. Br J Anaesth 2000: 84: 59-62.
11. 11. Kokki H, Heikkinen M, Turunen M, Vanamo K, Hendolin H. Needle design does not affect the success rate of spinal anaesthesia or the incidence of postpuncture complications in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000: 44: 210-213.
12. 12. Petersen-Felix S, Arendt-Nielsen L, Bak P, Fischer M, Zbinden A. Psychophysical and electrophysiological responses to experimental pain may be influenced by sedation: comparison of the effects of a hypnotic (propofol) and an analgesic (alfentanil). Br J Anaesth 1996: 77: 165-171.
13. 13. Oberlander TF, Berde CB, Lam KH, Rappaport LA, Saul JP. Infants tolerate spinal anaesthesia with minimal overall autonomic changes: analysis of heart rate variability in former premature infants undergoing hernia repair. Anesth Analg 1995: 80: 20-27.