Integrated gravity and wide-angle seismic inversion for two-dimensional crustal modelling

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 140, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 222-232

  Nielsen, Lars ^a,b   Jacobsen, Bo Holm ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Crust; Gravity data; Integrated modelling; Joint inversion; Seismic data; Velocity density relations

Indexed keywords

CRUSTAL STRUCTURE; GRAVITY SURVEY; INVERSE ANALYSIS; SEISMIC SURVEY;

EID: 0034059592     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2000.00012.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Barton, P.J., 1986. The relationship between seismic velocity and density in the continental crust - a useful constraint? Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 87, 195-208.
2. Barton, P.J. & Matthews, D.H., 1984. Deep structure and geology of the North Sea region interpreted from a seismic refraction profile, Ann. Geophys., 2, 663-668.
3. Birch, F., 1961. The velocity of compressional waves in rocks to 10 kilobars, Part 2, J. geophys. Res., 66, 2199-2224.
4. Carmichael, R.S., 1989. Practical Handbook of Physical Properties of Rocks and Minerals, CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton.
5. Christensen, N.I. & Mooney, W.D., 1995. Seismic velocity and composition of the continental crust: a global view, J. geophys Res., 100(B7), 9761-9788.
6. Henkel, H., Lee, M.K., Lund, C.-E. & Rasmussen, T.. 1990. An integrated geophysical interpretation of the 2000 km FENNOLORA section of the Baltic Shield, in The European Geotraverse: Integrative Studies, pp. 1-47, eds Freeman, R., Giese, P. & Mueller, St., European Science Foundation, Strasbourg.
7. Hole, J.A., 1992. Nonlinear high-resolution three-dimensional seismic travel time tomography, J. geophys. Res., 97(B5), 6553-6562.
8. Jackson, D.D., 1979. The use of prior data to solve non-uniqueness in linear inversion, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 57, 137-157.
9. Jacobsen, B.H., 1988. Reply to discussion of 'A case for upward continuation as a standard separation filter for potential field maps', by Jacobsen, B.H., Geophysics, 53, 723-724.
10. Ludwig, J.W., Nafe, J.E. & Drake, C.L., 1970. Seismic refraction, In The Sea, Vol. 4, pp. 53-84, ed. Maxwell, A.E., Wiley, New York.
11. Rasmussen, R. & Pedersen, L.B., 1979. End corrections in potential field modelling, Geophys. Prospect., 27, 749-760.
12. Skeels, D.C., 1947. Ambiguity in gravity interpretation, Geophysics, 12, 43-55.
13. Tarantola, A., 1987. Inverse Problem Theory, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
14. Tarantola, A. & Valette, B., 1982. Generalized non-linear inverse problems solved using the least squares criterion, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 20, 219-232.
15. Zelt, C.A. & Ellis, R.M., 1988. Practical and efficient ray tracing in two-dimensional media for rapid traveltime and amplitude forward modelling, Can. J. expl. Geophys., 24, 16-31.
16. Zelt, C.A. & Smith, R.B., 1992. Seismic traveltime inversion for 2-D crustal velocity structure, Geophys. J. Int., 108, 16-34.