Phoneme discrimination from MEG data

Neurocomputing

Volumn 31, Issue 1-4, 2000, Pages 153-165

  Lukka, Tuomas ^a   Schoner, Bernd ^b   Marantz, Alec ^c  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MIT MEDIA LAB   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

MEG data; Phoneme discrimination; Signal detection

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; DATA STRUCTURES; FEATURE EXTRACTION; SIGNAL DETECTION; SPEECH RECOGNITION; VECTORS; WAVELET TRANSFORMS;

PHONEME DISCRIMINATION;

MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONSONANT; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; PHONEME; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIGNAL DETECTION; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

EID: 0034059369     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0925-2312(99)00178-2     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Aulanko R., Hari R., Lounasmaa O.V., Näätänen R., Sams M. Phonetic invariance in the human auditory cortex. Neuroreport. 4:1993;1356-1358.
2. R.G. Brown, P.Y. Hwang, Introduction to Random Signals and Applied Kalman Filtering, New York, 1992.
3. Coifman R.R., Saito N. Constructions of local orthonormal bases for classification and regression. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I. 2:1994;191-196.
4. Coifman R.R., Wickerhauser M.W. Entropy-based algorithms for best basis selection. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory. 38:1992;713-718.
5. Dempster A.P., Laird N.M., Rubin D.B. Maximum Likelihood From Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm. J.R. Statist. Soc. Ser. B. 39:1977;1-38.
6. Fujimaki N., Hirata Y., Kuriki S., Nakajima H. Event-related magnetic fields at latencies of over 400 ms in silent reading of japanese katakana meaningless words. Neurosci. Res. 23:1995;419-422.
7. Gershenfeld N., Schoner B., Metois E. Cluster-weighted modelling for time series analysis. Nature. 397:1999;329-332.
8. S. Makeig et al., Ica matlab package for psychophysiological data, 1998. http://www.cnl.salk.edu/scott/ica-download-form.html .
9. Makeig S., Bell A.J., Jung T.-P, Sejnowski T.J. Independent component analysis of electroencephalographic data. Touretzky D., Mozer M., Hasselmo M. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Vol. 8:1996;145-151 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. Makeig S., Jung T.-P., Ghahremani D., Bell A.J., Sejnowski T.J. Blind separation of auditory event-related brain responses into independent components. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;10 979-10 984.
11. Oja E. Subspace Methods of Pattern Recognition. 1983;Research Studies Press, New York.
12. Poeppel D., Yellin E., Phillips C., Roberts T.P.L., Rowley H.A., Wexler K., Marantz A. Task-induced asymmetry of the auditory evoked m100 neuromagnetic field elicited by speech sounds. Cognitive Brain Res. 4:1996;231-242.