LEADER, a new social order, and the Central-and East-European countries

Sociologia Ruralis

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 181-189

  Kovách, Imre ^a  

^a Magyar Tudomanyos Akademia Politikai Tudomanyok Intezete   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EUROPEAN UNION; POLICY STRATEGY; REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT; RURAL PLANNING;

EUROPE;

EID: 0034059108     PISSN: 00380199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00140     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bell, M. and P. Lowe (1998) Regulated freedoms: the market and the state, agriculture and the environment. Working Paper 35, Centre for rural Economy (University of Newcastle upon Tyne)
2. Bourdieu, P. (1973) Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In R. Brown ed., Knowledge, education and social change (London: Tavistock)
3. Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and symbolic power (Cambridge MS: Harvard University Press)
4. Csite, A. (1998) Constructing the miserable countryside. Pp, 231-256 in L. Granberg and I. Kovách eds, Actors on the changing European countryside (Budapest: Institute for political sciences)
5. Csite, A. and I. Kovách (1999b) A regionáles és vidékfejlesztési politka Európaizálása Magyarországon az 1990-es években (The Europeanization of regional and rural development policy in Hungary in 1990s) manuscript
6. Curtin, C., T. Haase and H. Tovey (1997) Poverty in rural Ireland (Dublin: Oak Tree Press)
7. Gazsö, F. (1999) A tärsadalom alulnézetbol (The society from below) manuscript
8. Gorlach, K. and Z. Serega (1995) Family farming in the contemporary world: east-west comparisons (Krakow: Universytet Jagiellonski)
9. Gorlach, K., L. Kocik and P. Nowak (1998) Painful experience once again: Polish peasant facing uncertain future. In L. Grandberg and I. Kovách eds, Actors on the changing European countryside (Budapest: Institute for Political Sciences)
10. Gorlach, K., I. Kovách and P. Starosta (2000) The post-socialist Hungarian and Polish countryside (University of Lodz) forthcoming
11. De Haan, H. and J. D. van der Ploeg (1994) Endogenous rural development in Europe: theory, method and practice. Proceedings of a seminar held in Vila Real. (Luxembourg: European Commission)
12. Kovách, I. (1994) The privatization and the future of family farms in east-central Europe. Sociologia Ruralis 34 (4 ) pp. 369-373
13. Kovách, I. (1998) Regional development and voluntary association in Hungary. Environment et Société 20, pp. 61-67
14. Kovács, K. (1998) Re-structuring post-socialist agriculture. Replika special issue
15. Polányi, K. (1991) The great transformation (Beacon Press)
16. Marsden, T. (1999) The consumption countryside and its regulation. Sociologia Ruralis 39 (4) pp. 501-521
17. Ray, C. (1998) Culture, intellectual property and territorial rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 38 (1) pp. 3-20
18. Ray, C. (1999) Towards a meta-framework of endogenous development: repertoires, paths, democracy and rights. Sociologia Ruralis 39 (4) pp. 521-537
19. Shucksmith, M. and P. Chapman (1998) Rural development and social exclusion. Sociologia Ruralis 38 (2) pp. 225-242
20. Starosta, P. (1998) Inhabitants' feeling of social bonds with rural and small town communities in Bulgaria, Poland and Russia. In L. Grandberg and I. Kovách eds, Actors on the changing European countryside (Budapest: Institute for Palitical Sciences)
21. Swain, N. (1994) Transition from collective to family farming in post-communistic Central Europe. Eastern European countryside, pp. 17-30
22. Szelényi, I. (1988) Socialist entrepreneurs: embourgeoisement in rural Hungary (The Wisconsin University Press)
23. Szelényi, I. (1998) Privatising the Land. Rural political economies in post-communist societies (London: Routledge)
24. Walder, A. (1994) Corporate organisations and local state property rights in China. In V. Milor ed., Changing political economies: privatization in post-communist and reforming communist states (Boulder co: Lynne Reiner)
25. Walder, A. (1995) Local governments as industrial firms: an organisational analysis of China's transitional economy. American Journal of Sociology 101 (2) pp. 263-301