Rehabilitative placement of poststroke patients: Reliability of the Clinical Practice Guideline of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 81, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 539-548

  Johnston, Mark V ^a,b   Wood, Kenneth ^a,b   Stason, William B ^c   Beatty, Phillip ^d  

^a KESSLER FOUNDATION   (United States)

^b RUTGERS NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d National Rehabilitation Hospital Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerebrovascular disorder; Patient discharge; Practice guidelines; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; STROKE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0034057731     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/mr.2000.4434     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Faulkner & Gray. 1998 Medical outcomes and guidelines sourcebook. New York: Faulkner & Gray; 1998.
2. Institute of Medicine Committee To Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines. In: Field MJ, Lohr KN, editors. Clinical practice guidelines. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1990.
3. Johnston MV, Maney M, Wilkerson DL. Systematically assuring and improving the quality and outcomes of medical rehabilitation programs. In: DeLisa J, editor. Rehabilitation medicine: principles and practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. p. 287-320.
4. Gresham GE, Duncan PW, Stason WB (Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Guideline Panel). Clinical practice guideline no 16: poststroke rehabilitation. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1995. AHCPR publication number 95-0662.
5. Fiedler R, Granger C. Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation: report of first admissions for 1995. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1997;76:76-81.
6. Unsworth C. Team decision making in rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996;75:483-6.
7. Osberg S, Unsworth C. Trauma-rehabilitation connections: discharge and admission decisions for children. Pediatr Rehabil 1997;1:131-46.
8. Lee A, Huber J, Stason W. Factors contributing to practice variation in post-stroke rehabilitation. Health Serv Res 1997;34:197-221.
9. Neu C, Harrison S, Heilbrun J. Medicare patients and postacute care: who goes where? Santa Monica (CA): Rand Corporation; 1989.
10. Lee AJ, Huber J, Stason WB. Poststroke rehabilitation in older Americans: the Medicare experience. Med Care 1996;34:811-25.
11. Forer S. Outcomes and case management: the keys to survival under managed care capitation. Rehabil Manage 1998;11(3):92-5.
12. Wheatley B, DeJong G, Sutton J. Managed care and the transformation of the medical rehabilitation industry. Health Care Management Rev 1997;22(3):25-39.
13. Salladay S. Rehabilitation, ethics, and managed care. Rehabil Manage 1996;9(6):38-42.
14. Johnston MV, Zorowitz R, Nash B. Family help available. Top Geriatr Rehabil 1994;9(3):38-53.
15. Mayer-Oakes S, Hoenig H, Atchison K, Lubben J, De Jong F, Schweitzer S. Patient related predictors of rehabilitation use for community-dwelling older Americans. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992;40: 336-42.
16. Jeffrey D, Good D. Rehabilitation of the stroke patient. Curr Opin Neurol 1995;8(1):62-8.
17. Anderson T. Studies up to 1980 on stroke rehabilitation outcomes. Stroke 1990;21(9 Suppl):1143-5.
18. Johnston MV, Keith RA, Hinderer S. Measurement standards for interdisciplinary medical rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73(12 Suppl):S6-S23.
19. Forbes SA, Duncan PW, Zimmerman MK. Review criteria for stroke rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;768: 1112-6.
20. Allen MJ, Yen WM. Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey (CA): Brooks/Cole; 1979.
21. de Haan R, Limburg M, Bossuyt P, Vanger Meulen J, Aaronson N. The clinical meaning of Rankin "handicap" grades after stroke. Stroke 1995;26:2027-30.
22. Brott T, Adams H, Olinger C, Marler J, Barsan W, Biller J, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989;20:864-70.
23. Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P. "Mini-mental state": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189-98.
24. Whitelaw N, Liang J. The structure of the OARS physical health measures. Med Care 1991;29:332-47.
25. Shrout P, Fleiss J. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-8.
26. Ottenbacher K, Mann W, Granger C, Tomita M, Hurren D, Charvat B. Inter-rater agreement and stability of functional assessment in the community based elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75: 1297-1301.
27. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley; 1981.
28. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.
29. Wade DT. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.
30. CARF Rehabilitation Accreditation Commission. 1998 Medical rehabilitation standards manual. Tucson (AZ): Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities; 1998.
31. DeJong G, Sutton J. Rapid growth of postacute care services leads policy makers to reconsider bundling Medicare postacute services: debate shifts on the future of Medicare prospective payment for inpatient rehabilitation. Rehabil Outlook 1997; 2(3):1ff.
32. Congressional Budget Office (US). Medicare spending on postacute services: a preliminary analysis. Washington (DC): Congressional Budget Office; 1997.
33. Liu K, Wissoker D, Rimes C. Determinants and costs of Medicare post-acute care provided by SNFs and HHAs. Inquiry 1998; 35(Spring):49-61.
34. Welch P. Bundled Medicare payment for acute and postacute care: would financial risk to hospitals increase if Medicare paid them a lump sum per episode of care? Health Aff 1998;17(6):69-81.
35. Lee A. Bundling post-acute care (PAC) with Medicare DRG payments: an exploration of the distributional and risk consequences. Inquiry 1996;(Fall):283-91.