A time-dependent probabilistic seismic-hazard model for California

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 1-21

  Cramer, Chris H ^a,b   Petersen, Mark D ^a,c   Cao, Tianqing ^a   Toppozada, Tousson R ^a   Reichle, Michael ^a  

^a Division of Mines and Geology   (United States)

^b U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^c DENVER FEDERAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE RECURRENCE; MODEL; SEISMIC HAZARD;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034054103     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0119980087     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Applied Technology Council (1985). ATC-13: earthquake damage evaluation data for California, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, 492 pp.
2. Bakun, W. H., and T. V. McEvilly (1984). Recurrence models and Parkfield, California, earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res. 89, 3051-3058.
3. Benjamin, J. R., and C. A. Cornell (1970). Probability, Statistics, and Decision for Civil Engineers, McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York, 684 pp.
4. Cao, T., M. D. Petersen, C. H. Cramer, T. R. Toppozada, M. R. Reichle, and J. D. Davis (1999). The calculation of expected loss from probabilistic seismic hazard, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 89, 867-876.
5. Cramer, C. H., M. D. Petersen, and M. S. Reichle (1996). A Monte Carlo approach in estimating uncertainty for a seismic hazard assessment of Los Angeles, Ventura, and Orange counties, California, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86, 1681-1691.
6. Ellsworth, W. L., M. V. Matthews, R. M. Nadeau, S. P. Nishenko, P. A. Reasenberg, and R. W. Simpson (1999). A physically-based earthquake recurrence model for estimation of long-term earthquake probabilities, in Proceedings of the Second Joint Meeting of the U.S.-Japan Natural Resources Panel on Earthquake Research, Kobe, Japan, November 3-6, 1998, Geographical Survey Institute, Ministry of Construction (in press).
7. Frankel. A., C. Mueller, T. Barnhard, D. Perkins, E. V. Leyendecker, N. Dickman, S. Hanson, and M. Hopper (1996). National seismic hazard maps, June 1996 documentation U. S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Report 96-532.
8. Jacoby, G. C., D. E. Bunker, and B. E. Benson (1997). Tree-ring evidence for an A.D. 1700 Cascadia earthquake in Washington and northern Oregon, Geology 25, 999-1002.
9. Litehiser, J., J. Marrone, and N. Abrahamson (1992). A preliminary model of firm foundation acceleration hazard in the San Francisco Bay area, Earthquake Spectra 8, 225-257.
10. Nishenko, S. P., and R. Buland (1987). A generic recurrence interval distribution for earthquake forecasting, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 77, 1382-1399.
11. Petersen, M. D., W. A. Bryant, C. H. Cramer, T. Cao, M. S. Reichle, A. D. Frankel, J. J. Lienkaemper, P. A. McCrory, and D. P. Schwartz (1996). Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the state of California, California Dept. of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Open-File Report 96-08, 68 pp.
12. Petersen, M. D., C. H. Cramer, and M. S. Reichle (1997). Earthquakes that contribute to hazard and risk within the state of California (abstract), EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 78, F496.
13. Satake, K., K. Shimazaki, Y. Tsuji, and K. Ueda (1996). Time and size of a giant earthquake in Cascadia inferred from Japanese tsunami records of January 1700, Nature 379, 246-249.
14. Savage, J. C. (1991). Criticism of some forecasts of the National Earthquake Prediction Evaluation Council, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 81, 862-881.
15. Savage, J. C. (1992). The uncertainty in earthquake conditional probabilities, Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 709-712.
16. Sieh, K., M. Stuiver, D. Brillinger (1989). A more precise chronology of earthquakes produced by the San Andreas fault in southern California, J. Geophys. Res. 94, 603-623.
17. Thatcher, W., G. Marshall, and M. Lisowski (1997). Resolution of fault slip along the 470-km-long rupture of the great 1906 San Francisco earthquake and its implications, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 5353-5367.
18. Toppozada, T. R., and G. Borchardt (1998). Re-evaluation of the 1936 "Hayward" and the 1838 San Andreas fault earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 88, 140-159.
19. Toppozada, T. R., G. Borchardt, W. Haydon, M. Petersen, R. Olson, H. Lagoria, and T. Anvik (1995). Planning scenario in Humboldt and Del Norte counties, California for a great earthquake on the Cascadia subduction zone, California Dept. of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 115, 162 pp.
20. Trifunac, M. D., and A. G. Brady (1975). On the correlation of seismic intensity scales with the peaks of recorded strong ground motion, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 65, 139-163.
21. Valentine, D., G. Vick, G. Carver, C. S. Manhart (1992). Late Holocene stratigraphy and paleoseismicity, Humboldt Bay, California, in Pacific Cell, Friends of the Pleistocene, Guidebook for the Field Trip to Northern Coastal California, A look at the southern end of the Cascadia Subduction Zone and The Mendocino Triple Junction, June 5-June 7, 1992, Friends of the Pleistocene, 182-187.
22. Wells, D. L., and K. J. Coppersmith (1994). New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 84, 974-1002.
23. WGCEP88 (1988). Probabilities of large earthquakes occurring in California on the San Andreas fault, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept. 88-398.
24. WGCEP90 (1990). Probabilities of large earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay region, California, U.S. Geol. Surv. Circ. 1053.
25. WGCEP94 (1995). Seismic hazards in southern California: probable earthquakes, 1994 to 2024, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 85, 379-439.
26. WGNCEP96 (1996). Database of potential sources for earthquakes larger than magnitude 6 in northern California, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept. 96-705.
27. Wu, S.-C., C. A. Cornell, and S. R. Winterstein (1995). A hybrid recurrence model and its implication on seismic hazard results, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 85, 1-16.