Public choice theory and the politics of urban containment: Voter-centred versus special-interest explanations

Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 145-162

  Pennington, Mark ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LAND USE PLANNING; PLANNING SYSTEM; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN PLANNING;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0034054049     PISSN: 0263774X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/c9804j     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Agriculture Act, 1986 Public General Acts-Elizabeth II chapter 5 (The Stationery Office, London)
2. Ambrose P, 1986 Whatever Happened to Planning? (Methuen, London)
3. Arrow K, 1951 Social Choice and Individual Values (John Wiley, New York)
4. Ball M, 1983 Housing Policy and Economic Power (Methuen, London)
5. Barde J P, Button K J, 1990 Transport Policy and the Environment: Six Case Studies (Earthscan, London)
6. Bartel A P, Thomas L G, 1987, "Predation through regulation" Journal of Law and Economics 30 239-264
7. Roth, 1979-96 Guide to Parliament (Roth, London)
8. Rydin Y, 1986 Housing Land Policy (Gower, Aldershot, Hants)
9. Winter M, 1996 Rural Politics (Routledge, London)
10. Young S, 1995, "Running up the down escalator: developments in British wildlife policies after Mrs Thatcher's 1988 speeches", in UK Environmental Policy in the 1990s Ed. T Gray (Macmillan, London) pp 237-262