Two dimensional inverse imaging (2DII) of current sources in magnetoencephalography

Brain Topography

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 201-217

  Moran, John E ^a   Tepley, Norman ^a,b  

^a HENRY FORD HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b OAKLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

2D inverse imaging; Algorithm; Brain mapping; Computer assisted; Electroencephalography; Image processing; Magnetoencephalography

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0034053379     PISSN: 08960267     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1023441924015     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anogianakis, G., Harding, G.F., Peters, M., Apostolalis, M., Foroglou, G., Vieth, J. and Ioannides, A. Biomagnetic methodologies for the noninvasive investigations of the human brain (MAGNOBRAIN). Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 1994, 45(1-2): 111-114.
2. Baillet, S. and Garnero, L.A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1997,44(5): 374-385.
3. Chui, C.K. An introduction to wavelets academic press. San Diego, CA, 1992:1-22.
4. Crowley, C.W. and Budiman, J. Reducible intergal equation for a dipole in a quasispherical conductor. In: M. Hoke, S.N. Erné, Y.C. Okada and G.L. Romani (Eds.), Biomagnetism: Clinical aspects. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1992: 699-703.
5. Crowley, T. A., Haupt, C.D. and Kynor, D.B. A weighting matrix to remove depth bias in the linear biomagnetic inverse problem with application to cardiology. In: C. Aine, E. Flynn, Y. Okada, G. Stroink, S. Swithenby and C. Wood(Eds.), Advances in Biomagnetism Research: Biomag96, Springer-Verlag, New York, (in press).
6. George, J.S., Aine, C.J., Mosher, J.C., Schmidt, D.M., Ranken, D.M., Schlitt, H.A., Wood, C.C., Lewine, J.D., Sanders, J.A. and Belliveau, J.W. Mapping function in the human brain with magnetoencephalography, anatomical magnetic resonance imaging, and functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1995, 12(5): 406-431.
7. Gorodnitsky, I.F., George, J.S. and Rao, B.D. Neuromagnetic source imaging with FOCUSS: a recurisive weighted minimum norm algorithm. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1995, 95: 231-251.
8. Greitz, T., Bohm, C., Hellstrand, E., Hämäläinen, M.S., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, L.J., Seitz, R. and Lounasmaa, O.V.Use of a computerized brain atlas in magnetoencephalographic activation studies. Neuroreport, 1994,5(4): 449-452.
9. Grunwald, A. and Lütkenhöner, B. Estimation of distributed sources with adjustable contrast. In: C. Aine, E. Flynn, Y. Okada, G. Stroink, S. Swithenby and C. Wood (Eds.), Advances in Biomagnetism Research: Biomag96, Springer-Verlag, New York, (in press).
10. Hämäläinen, M., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R.J., Knuutila, J. and Lounasmaa, O. V. Magnetoencephalography - theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev. Mod. Phys., 1993, 65(No. 2): 413-495.
11. Hasson, R. and Swithenby, S.J. Correlation coefficient scanning to identify localised activity. In: M. Hoke, S.N. Erné, Y.C. Okada and G.L. Romani (Eds.), Biomagnetism: Clinical aspects. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1992:779-782.
12. Haueisen, J., Ramon, C., Eisent, M., Brauer, H. and Nowak, H. Influence of tissue resistivities on neuromagnetic fields and electric potentials studied with a finite element model of the head. IEEE Trans Biomed. Eng., 1997, 44(8): 727-735.
13. Kil, D.H. and Shin, F.B., Pattern recognition and prediction with applications to signal characterization, American Institute of Physics, Woodbury, NY, 1996, 4.3:119-141.
14. Leahy, R.M., Mosher, J.C. and Phillips, J.W. A comparative study of minimum norm inverse methods for MEG imaging. In: C. Aine, E. Flynn, Y. Okada, G. Stroink, S. Swithenby and C. Wood(Eds.), Advances in Biomagnetism Research: Biomag96, Springer-Verlag, New York, (in press).
15. Lütkenhöner, B. Dipole and multidipole source analysis of magnetic fields: possibilities and limitations. In: C. Baumgartner, L. Deecke, G. Stroink and S.J. Williamson (Eds.), Biomagnetism: Fundamental Research and Clinical Applications. Elsevier, IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995: 376-380.
16. Marks, R.J. II. Alternating projections onto convex sets. In: P.A. Jansson (Ed.), Deconvolution of Images and Spectra 2nd ed., Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1997, 14: 476-501.
17. Mosher, J.C., Lewis, P.S. and Leahy, R.M. Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data. IEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1992, 39: 541-557.
18. Mosher, J.C., Chang, C.H., and Leahy, R.M. Comparison of the constant and linear boundary element method for EEG and MEG forward modeling. In: C. Aine, E. Flynn, Y. Okada, G. Stroink, S. Swithenby and C. Wood (Eds.), Advances in Biomagnetism Research: Biomag96, Springer-Verlag, NewYork, (in press).
19. Phillips, J.W., Leahy, R.M., Mosher, J.C. and Timsari, B. Imaging neural activity using MEG and EEG. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol., 1997, 16(3): 34-42.
20. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. and Flannery, B.P. Linear regularization methods, deterministic constraints: projections onto convex sets in: numerical recipes in C. 2nd ed., 1996(a): 813-815.
21. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. and Flannery, B.P. Wavelet transforms in: numerical recipes in C, 2nd ed., 1996(b): 591-606.
22. Sarvas, J. Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys. Med. Biol., 1987, 32:11-22.
23. Schmidt, D.M., George, J.S. and Wood, C.C. Bayesian inference applied to the electromagnetic inverse problem. 1997, Los Alamos technical report: LA-UR-97-4813.
24. Wang, J.Z., Kaufman, L. and Williamson, S.J. Imaging regional changes in the spontaneous activity of the brain: an extension of the minimum-norm least-squares estimate, Electroencephalogr. clin. Neurophysiol., 1993, 86: 36-50.
25. Wasserman, P.D., Adaptice resonance theory. In: Neural Computing: Theory and Practice, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, Ch. 8: 127-150.
26. Wijesinghe, R.S. and Tepley, N. A four sphere model for calculating the magnetic field associated with spreading cortical depression. Brain Topography, 1997, 9: 191-202.
27. Wijesinghe, R.S., Roth, B.J. and Tepley, N., Modeling of spreading cortical depression using a realistic head model. Brain Topography, 1998, 11: 13-11.