The school boundary stability problem over time

Socio-Economic Planning Sciences

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 159-176

  Lemberg, David S ^a   Church, Richard L ^b  

^a WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION POLICY; INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING; PLANNING METHOD;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034047964     PISSN: 00380121     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0038-0121(99)00019-1     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Armstrong M.P., Lolonis P., Honey R. A spatial decision support system for school redistricting. URISA Journal. 5:(1):1993;40-51.
2. Belford P.C., Ratliff H.D. A network-flow model for racially balancing schools. Ops. Res. 20:(3):1972;619-628.
3. Bovet J. Simple heuristics for the school assignment problem. J. Opl. Res. Soc. 33:1982;695-703.
4. Brown P.J.B. Trade-off and compromise in secondary school reorganization schemes: a goal programming approach. Pap. Reg. Sci. Ass. 61:1987;115-130.
5. Bruno J.E., Anderson P.W. Analytical methods for planning educational facilities in an era of declining enrollments. Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. 16:(3):1982;121-131.
6. California Department of Education, Office of School Facility Planning, personal communication, October 17, 1996.
7. Church R.L., Murray A.T. Modeling school utilization and consolidation. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 119:(1):1993;23-38.
8. Church R.L., Schoepfle O.B. The choice alternative to school assignment. Envir. & Plann. B. 20:1993;447-457.
9. Clarke S., Surkis J. An operations research approach to the desegregation of school systems. Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. 1:1968;259-272.
10. Diamond J.T., Wright J.R. Multiobjective analysis of public school consolidation. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 113:(1):1987;1-18.
11. Ferland J.A., Guénette G. Decision support system for the school districting problem. Ops. Res. 38:(1):1990;15-21.
12. Franklin A.D., Koenigsburg E. Computed school assignments in a large district. Ops. Res. 21:(2):19783;413-426.
13. Garrison W. Spatial structure of the economy: II. Ann. AAG. 49:(4):1959;471-482.
14. Greenleaf N.E., Harrison T.P. A mathematical programming approach to elementary school facility decisions. Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. 21:(6):1987;395-401.
15. Heckman L.B., Taylor H.M. School rezoning to achieve a racial balance: a linear programming approach. Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. 3:(2):1969;127-133.
16. Henig M., Gerchak Y. Dynamic capacity planning of public schools in changing urban communities. Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. 20:(5):1986;319-324.
17. Holloway C.A., Wehrung D.A., Zeitlin M.P., Nelson R.T. An interactive procedure for the school boundary problem with declining enrollments. Ops. Res. 23:(2):1975;191-206.
18. Jennergren P.L., Obel B. A study in the use of linear programming for school planning in Odense. J. Opl. Res. Soc. 31:(9):1980;791-799.
19. Knutson D.L., Marquis L.M., Ricchute D.M., Saunders G.M. A goal programming model for achieving racial balance in public schools. Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. 14:1980;109-116.
20. Lemberg DS. 10 Year enrollment projections. Santa Barbara School District. Santa Barbara, CA 1992.
21. Lemberg D.S., Church R.L. Feasible alternatives generation in collaborative spatial decision making. GIS/LIS '96 Proceedings, GIS/LIS '96, Denver, CO, November, 1996. 1996.
22. Lemberg D.S., Smith E. Geographic information systems (GIS) and school facilities planning. CASBO Journal. 54:(1):1989;19-22.
23. Liggett R.S. The application of an implicit enumeration algorithm to the school desegregation problem. Man. Sci. 20:(1):1983;159-168.
24. Maxfield D.W. Spatial planning of school districts. Ann. AAG. 62:(4):1972;580-590.
25. McDaniel R.D. Case study of the use of the transportation algorithm for school districting under federal integration guidelines. Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. 9:(6):1975;271-272.
26. McKeown P., Workman B. A study in using linear programming to assign students to schools. Interfaces. 6:(4):1976;96-101.
27. Ploughman T., Darnton W., Heusser W. An assignment program to establish school attendance area boundaries and forecast construction needs. Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. 1:1968;243-258.
28. Schoepfle OB. The modeling of schools under declining and fluctuating enrollments. PhD Dissertation, Department of Geography, University of California at Santa Barbara 1988.
29. Schoepfle O.B., Church R.L. A fast, network-based hybrid heuristic for the assignment of students to schools. J. Opl. Res. Soc. 40:(11):1989;1029-1040.
30. Schoepfle O.B., Church R.L. A new network representation of a "classic" school districting problem. Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. 25:(3):1991;189-197.
31. Sutcliffe C., Board J., Cheshire P. Goal programming and allocating children to secondary schools in Reading. J. Ops. Res. Soc. 35:(8):1984;719-730.
32. Trifon R., Livnat A. The spatial allocation of schools over time in cities. Reg. and Urban Econ. 2:(4):1973;387-400.
33. Woodall M., Cromley R.G., Semple R.K., Green M.B. The elimination of racially identifiable schools. Prof. Geogr. 32:(4):1980;412-420.
34. Yeates M. Hinterland delimitation: a distance minimizing approach. Prof. Geogr. 15:(6):1963;7-10.