Treatment of perioral rhytides: A comparison of dermabrasion and superpulsed carbon dioxide laser

Archives of Dermatology

Volumn 136, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 725-731

  Holmkvist, Kristina A ^a,b   Rogers, Gary S ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Accredited Dermatol Med Clinic Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARBON DIOXIDE LASER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; ERYTHEMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LASER SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RHYTIDOPLASTY; SKIN ABRASION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND HEALING;

ADULT; AGED; DERMABRASION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LASER SURGERY; LIP; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SKIN AGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0034047821     PISSN: 0003987X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Fitzpatrick RE, Tope WD, Goldman MP, Satur NM. Pulsed carbon dioxide laser, trichloroacetic acid, Baker-Gordon phenol, and dermabrasion: a comparative clinical and histologic study of cutaneous resurfacing in a porcine model. Arch Dermatol. 1996;132:469-471.
2. Gin I, Chew J, Rau KA, Amos DB, Bridenstine JB. Treatment of upper lip wrinkles: a comparison of the 950 msec dwell time carbon dioxide laser to manual tumescent dermabrasion. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25:468-474.
3. Pathak MA, Fitzpatrick TB. Preventive treatment of sunburn, 2nd dermatoheliosis skin cancer with sun-protective agent. In: Fitzpatrick TB, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, Freedberg IM, Austen KF, eds. Dermatology in General Medicine. 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Inc; 1993:1689-1717.
4. Zisser M, Kaplan B. Moy RL Surgical pearl: manual dermabrasion. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;33:105-106.
5. Waldorf HA, Kauvar AN, Geronemus RG. Skin resurfacing of fine to deep rhytides using a char-free carbon dioxide laser in 47 patients. Dermatol Surg. 1995; 21:940-946.
6. Lowe NJ, Lask G, Griffin ME. Laser skin resurfacing: pre-and posttreatment guidelines. Dermatol Surg 1995;21:1017-1019.
7. Lask G, Keller G, Lowe N, Gormley D. Laser skin resurfacing with the SilkTouch flashscanner for facial rhytides. Dermatol Surg. 1995;21:1021-1024.
8. Lowe, NJ, Lask G. Griffin ME, Maxwell A, Lowe P, Quilada F. Skin resurfacing with the Ultrapulse carbon dioxide laser: observations on 100 patients. Dermatol Surg. 1995;21:1025-1029.
9. Fitzpatrick RE, Goldman MP, Satur NM, Tope WD. Pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing of photo-aged skin. Arch Dermatol 1996;132:395-402.
10. Kirsch KM, Zelickson BD, Zachary CB, Tope WD. Ultrastructure of collagen thermally denatured by microsecond domain pulsed carbon dioxide laser. Arch Dermatol. 1998;134:1255-1259.
11. Reed JT, Joseph AK, Bridenstine JB. Treatment of periorbital wrinkles: a comparison of the SilkTouch carbon dioxide laser with a medium-depth chemical peel. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23:643-648.
12. Mehal KS, Levine VJ, Ross B, Ashinoff R. Comparison of high-energy pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing and dermabrasion in the revision of surgical scars. Dermatol Surg. 1998;24:647-650.
13. 2 laser skin resurfacing: a comparison of scanned and pulsed systems. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;37:709-718.
14. Manuskiatti W, Fitzpatrick RE, Goldman MP. Long-term effectiveness and side effects of carbon dioxide laser resurfacing for photoaged skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;40:401-411.
15. Benedetto AV, Griffin TD, Benedetto EA, Humeniuk HM. Dermabrasion: therapy and prophylaxis of the photoaged face. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;27:439-447.
16. Behin F, Feuerstein SS, Marovitz WF. Comparative histological study of mini pig skin after chemical peel and dermabrasion. Arch Otolaryngol, 1977;103:271-277.
17. Kligman AM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL. Long-terrn histologic follow-up of phenol face peels. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;75:652-659,
18. Cotton J, Hood AF, Gonin R, Beeson WH, Hanke CW. Histologic evaluation of preauricular and postauricular skin after high-energy, short-pulse carbon dioxide laser. Arch Dermatol. 1996;132:425-428,
19. Nelson BR, Majmudar G, Griffiths CE, et al. Clinical improvement following dermabrasion of photoaged skin correlates with synthesis of collagen I. Arch Dermatol. 1994;130:1136-1142.
20. Yarborough JM, Dermabrasion by wire brush. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1987;13: 610-615.
21. Fulton JE Jr. Dermabrasion, chemabrasion, and laserabrasion: historical perspectives, modern dermabrasion techniques, and future trends. Dermatol Surg. 1996;22:619-626.
22. Wentzell JM, Robinson JK, Wentzell JM Jr, Schwartz DE, Carlson SE. Physical properties of aerosols produced by dermabrasion. Arch Dermatol. 1989;125:1637-1643.
23. Nezhat C, Winer WK, Nezhat F, Nezhat C, Forrest D, Reeves WG. Smoke from laser surgery: is there a health hazard? Lasers Surg Med. 1987;7:376-382.
24. Garden JM, O'Banion MK, Shelnitz LS, et al. Papillomavirus in the vapor of carbon dioxide laser-treated verrucae. JAMA. 1988;259:1199-1202.
25. Chiarello SE. Tumescent dermasanding with cryospraying: a new wrinkle on the treatment of rhytids. Dermatol Surg. 1996;22:601-610
26. Harris DR, Noodleman FR. Combining manual dermasanding with low strength trichloroacetic acid to improve actinically injured skin. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1994;20:436-442.
27. Gross DJ. Spot dermabrasion. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1994;20:699
28. Lusthaus S. The use of sandpaper in chemical peeling combined with dermabrasion of the face. Ann Plast Surg 1993;31:281-282.