Percutaneous vascular intervention based on gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 739-746

  Sharafuddin, Melhem J A ^a   Wroblicka, Joseph T ^a   Sun, Shiliang ^a   Essig, Marco ^a,b   Schoenberg, Stefan O ^a,b   Yuh, William T C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

^b GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Angiography, comparative studies; Angiography, contrast media; Magnetic resonance (MR), vascular studies

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STENOSIS; STENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0034047265     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61633-9     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media (comments). Radiology 1990; 175:621-628.
2. Mistretta CA, Crummy AB, Strother CM. Digital angiography: a perspective. Radiology 1981; 139:273-276.
3. Waugh JR, Sacharias N. Arteriographic complications in the DSA era (comments). Radiology 1992; 182:243-246.
4. Scarpato R, Gembarowicz R, Farber S, et al. Intraoperative prereconstruction arteriography. Arch Surg 1981; 116:1053-1055.
5. Ricco JB, Pearce WH, Yao JS, Flinn WR, Bergan JJ. The use of operative prebypass arteriography and Doppler ultrasound recordings to select patients for extended femorodistal bypass. Ann Surg 1983; 198: 646-653.
6. Flanigan DP, Williams LR, Keifer T, Schuler JJ, Behrend AJ. Prebypass operative arteriography. Surgery 1982; 92:627-633.
7. Patel KR, Semel L, Clauss RH. Extended reconstruction rate for limb salvage with intraoperative prereconstruction angiography (comments) J Vasc Surg 1988; 7:531-537.
8. Dardik H, Miller N, Adler J, et al. Primary and adjunctive intra-arterial digital subtraction arteriography of the lower extremities. J Vasc Surg 1986; 3:599-604.
9. Kahn PC, Boyer DN, Moran JM, Callow AD. Reactive hyperemia in lower extremity arteriography: an evaluation. Radiology 1968; 90:975-980.
10. Owen RS, Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Perloff LJ, Cope C. Magnetic resonance imaging of angiographically occult runoff vessels in peripheral arterial occlusive disease (comments). N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 1577-1581.
11. Carpenter JP, Owen RS, Baum RA, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral runoff vessels (comments). J Vasc Surg 1992; 16: 807-813.
12. McCauley TR, Monib A, Dickey KW, et al. Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: accuracy and reliability of time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1994; 192:351-357.
13. Cambria RP, Yucel EK, Brewster DC, et al. The potential for lower extremity revascularization without contrast arteriography: experience with magnetic resonance angiography. J Vasc Surg 1993; 17:1050-1056.
14. Hoch JR, Tullis MJ, Kennell TW, McDermott J, Acher CW, Turnipseed WD. Use of magnetic resonance angiography for the preoperative evaluation of patients with infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 1996; 23:792-800.
15. Link J, Steffens JC, Brossmann J, Graessner J, Hackenthal S, Heller M. Iliofemoral arterial occlusive disease: contrast-enhanced MR angiography for perinterventional evaluation and follow-up after stent placement. Radiology 1999; 212:371-377.
16. Hessel SJ, Adams DF, Abrams HL. Complications of angiography. Radiology 1981; 138:273-281.
17. Alley MT, Shifrin RY, Pelc NJ, Herfkens RJ. Ultrafast contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography: state of the art. Radiographics 1998; 18:273-285.
18. Forster BB, Houston JG, Machan LS, Doyle L. Comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight dynamic magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography in popliteal artery entrapment syndrome. Can Assoc Radiol J 1997; 48:11-18.
19. Shehadi WH, Toniolo G. Adverse reactions to contrast media: a report from the Committee on Safety of Contrast Media of the International Society of Radiology. Radiology 1980; 137:299-302.
20. Katzberg RW. Urography into the 21st century: new contrast media, renal handling, imaging characteristics, and nephrotoxicity (comments). Radiology 1997; 204:297-312.
21. Winchester PA, Lee HM, Khilnani NM, et al. Comparison of two-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremity with x-ray angiography. JVIR 1998; 9:891-899.
22. Lossef SV, Rajan SS, Patt RH, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnitude contrast MR angiography of popliteal and tibial arteries. Radiology 1992; 184:349-355.
23. Runge VM, Kirsch JE, Lee C. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3:233-239.
24. Revel D, Loubeyre P, Delignette A, Douek P, Amiel M. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance tomoangiography: a new imaging technique for studying thoracic great vessels. Magn Reson Imag 1993; 11:1101-1105.
25. Rodgers PM, Ward J, Baudouin CJ, Ridgway JP, Robinson PJ. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR: imaging of the portal venous system: comparison with x-ray angiography (comments). Radiology 1994; 191: 741-745.
26. Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Harrison DC, Geller SC. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR arteriography. J Magn Reson Imag 1993; 3:877-881.
27. Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology 1994; 191:155-164.
28. Douek PC, Revel D, Chazel S, Falise B, Villard J, Amiel M. Fast MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries and arteries of the lower extremity: value of bolus-enhanced, whole-volume subtraction technique. AJR 1995; 165:431-437.
29. Prince MR. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography: theory and optimization. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1998; 6:257-267.
30. Frayne R, Grist TM, Korosec FR, et al. MR angiography with three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 8:366-388.
31. Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Prince MR, Londy F, Knopp MA. Arterialphase three-dimensional gadolinium magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries: strategies for timing and contrast media injection - original investigation. Invest Radiol 1998; 33:506-514.
32. Schoenberg SO, Bock M, Knopp MV, et al. Renal arteries: optimization of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with bolus-timing-independent fast multiphase acquisition in a single breath hold (comments). Radiology 1999; 211:667-679.
33. Gilfeather M, Yoon HC, Siegelman ES, et al. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with conventional angiography versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1999; 210:367-372.