Analysis of cable-stayed bridges under multi-component random ground motion by response spectrum method

Engineering Structures

Volumn 22, Issue 10, 2000, Pages 1367-1377

  Allam, Said M ^a   Datta, T K ^b  

^a Alexandria University The Faculty Of Engineering   (Egypt)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI   (India)

Author keywords

Cable stayed bridge; Multi support excitations; Random ground motion; Response spectrum

Indexed keywords

PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; SEISMOLOGY; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; VIBRATIONS (MECHANICAL);

MULTI SUPPORT EXCITATION; RANDOM GROUND MOTION;

CABLE STAYED BRIDGES;

BRIDGE; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

EID: 0034047005     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00076-0     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Rutenberg A, Heidebrecht AC. Approximate spectral multiple-support seismic analysis; travelling wave approach. Research Report. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: Department of Civil Engineering, McMaster University, 1987.
2. Dong KK, Wieland M. Application of response spectrum method to a bridge subjected to multiple support excitation. In: Proc. 9th World Conf. Earthquake Eng., Tokyo, Japan. 1988;VI:531-6.
3. Yamamura N., Tanaka H. Response analysis of flexible MDF system for multiple-support seismic excitations. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 19:1990;345-357.
4. Berrah M, Kausel E. Modified response spectrum model for the design of structures subjected to spatially varying seismic excitations. Report R90-2. Cambridge (MA): Department of Civil Engineering, 1989.
5. Der Kiureghian A., Neuenhofer A. Response spectrum method for multi-support seismic excitations. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 21:1992;713-740.
6. Rassem M, Heidebrecht AC, Ghobarah A. Approximate spectral multiple suppoprt analysis applied to Humber suspension bridge. In: Proc. Annual Conf., CSCE, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 1990;IV-1:27-38.
7. Abdel Ghaffar A.M., Rubin L.I. Vertical seismic behaviour of suspension bridges. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 11:1983;1-19.
8. Nakamura Y, Der kiureghian A, Liu D. Multiple-support response spectrum analysis of the Golden Gate bridge. Report No. 93/05. Berkeley (CA): Earthquake Engineering Center, University of California, 1993.
9. Penzien J., Watabe M. Charactrestics of 3-dimensional earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 3:1975;365-373.
10. Clough R.W., Penzien J. Dynamics of structures. 1975;McGraw Hill, New York.
11. Hindy A., Novak M. Pipeline response to random ground motion. J. Eng. Mech., ASCE. 106:1980;339-360.
12. Allam S.M., Datta T.K. Seismic behaviour of cable-stayed bridges under multi-component random ground motion. Eng. Struct. 21(1):1999;62-74.
13. Kaul M.K. Stochastic characterization of earthquakes through their response spectrum. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 6:1978;497-509.
14. Davenport A.G. The distribution of largest values of random function with application to gust loading. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. (London). 28:1964;187-196.
15. Vanmarcke E.H. Structural response to earthquakes. Lomnitz C., Rosenblueth E. Seismic risk and engineering decisions. 1976;Elsevier, Amsterdam. Chapter 8.
16. Morris N.F. Dynamic analysis of cable stiffened structures. J. Struct. Eng. Div. ASCE. 106:1974;971-981.