The effect of environmental taxes on the volume of international trade

Ecological Economics

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 77-87

  Kohn, Robert E ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY EDWARDSVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmental taxes; Heckscher Ohlin Samuelson model; International trade

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL TAX; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; TRADE-ENVIRONMENT RELATIONS;

EID: 0034046365     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00140-3     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Bernow S., Costanza R., Daly H., DeGennaro R., Erlandson D., Ferris D., Hawken P., Hoerner J.A., Lancelot J., Marx T., Norland D., Peters I., Roodman D., Schneider C., Shyamsurdar P., Woodwell J. Ecological tax reform. Bioscience. 48:1998;193-196.
2. Bhagwati J., Srinivasan T.N. Trade and the environment: Does environmental diversity detract from the case for free trade. Bhagwati J., Srinivasan T.N. Fair Trade and Harmonization. 1:1997;159-223 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Helpman E. The structure of foreign trade. J. Econ. Perspect. 13:1999;121-144.
4. Kohn R.E. Global pollution: a Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson model of Pigouvian taxation. East. Econ. J. 17:1991;337-343.
5. Kohn R.E. Internalizing international versus domestic damages of a pure global pollutant: an extension of Musgrave and Shibata. Public Finance/Finances Publiques. 52:1997;145-156.
6. Kohn R.E. Pollution and the Firm. 1998;Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
7. Kohn R.E. Environmental protection by one or both trading partners in a Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson model. Open Econ. Rev. 9:1998;327-342.
8. Lindert P.H. International Economics. 1991;Irwin, Homewood, IL.
9. Røpke I. Trade, development and sustainability - a critical assessment of the free trade dogma. Ecol. Econ. 9:1994;13-22.
10. Rothman D.S. Environmental Kuznets curves - real progress or passing the buck? A case for consumption-based approaches. Ecol. Econ. 25:1998;177-194.
11. Samuelson P.A. International factor-price equalization once again. Econ. J. 9:1949;181-197.