The selection and design of multiple-species habitat preserves

Environmental Management

Volumn 26, Issue 1 SUPPL. 1, 2000, Pages

  Scott, Thomas A ^a,b   Sullivan, James E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecosystem processes; GIS analysis; Habitat conservation plans; Reserve design; Wildland urban interface

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEMS; LAND USE;

BIODIVERSITY; HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANS;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

CONSERVATION PLANNING; NATURE CONSERVATION; RESERVE DESIGN; SITE SELECTION;

CONFERENCE PAPER; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LAND USE; POLITICS; PROCESS CONTROL;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0034044958     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002670010061     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (71)

1. Angermeier, P. L., and J. R. Karr. 1994. Biological integrity versus biological diversity as policy directives. BioScience 44: 690-697.
2. Austin, M. P., and C. R. Margules. 1986. Assessing representativeness. Pages 46-67 in M. B. Usher (ed.). Wildlife conservation evaluation. Chapman and Hall, London.
3. Ballmer, G. 1995. Nation's richest insect diversity in California. California Agriculture 49(6):51-52.
4. Batt, K. D. 1995. Above all, do no harm: sweet home and section nine of the Endangered Species Act. Boston University Law Review 75(4):1177-1231.
5. Bedward, M., R. L. Pressey, and D. A. Keith. 1992. A new approach for selecting fully representative reserve networks: addressing efficiency, reserve design and land suitability with an iterative analysis. Biological Conservation 62(2): 115-125.
6. Belbin, L. 1993. Environmental representativeness: regional partitioning and reserve selection. Biological Conservation 66:223-230.
7. Bolger, D. T., A. C. Alberts, and M. E. Soule. 1991. Occurrence patterns of bird species in habitat fragments: sampling, extinction, and nested species in habitat fragments: sampling, extinction, and nested species subsets. American Naturalist 137:155-166.
8. Caughley, G., and A. Gunu. 1996. Conservation biology in theory and practice. Blackwell Science, Cambridge.
9. Church, R. L., D. M. Stoms, and F. W. Davis. 1996 Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem. Biological Conservation 76:105-112.
10. Clark, T. W. 1992. Practicing natural resource management with a policy orientation. Environmental Management 16(4): 423-433.
11. Cone, M. 1993. Crisis over rare bird avoidable - Babbitt. Los Angeles Times, Orange County, 17 Feb, p. 134.
12. Flather, C. H., K. R. Wilson, D. J. Dean, and W. C. McComb. 1997. Identifying gaps in conservation networks: of indicators and uncertainty in geographic-based analyses. Ecological Applications 7:531-542.
13. Frankel, O. H., and M. E. Soule. 1981. Conservation and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
14. Franklin, T. M. 1995. Putting wildlife science to work: influencing public policy. Wildlife Society Bulletin 23(3):322-326.
15. Gentry, A. H. 1986. Endemism in tropical versus temperate plant communities. Pages 153-181 in M. K. Soule (ed.), Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Snnderland, MA.
16. Gilpin, M. E., and M. E. Soule. 1986. Minimum viable populations: the processes of species extinctions. Pages 13-34 in M. E. Soule (ed.), Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
17. Holling, C. S. 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. in Proceedings of the United Nations Environment Programme//Workshop on Adaptive Assessment of Ecological Policies, 1977. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis; Wiley [Laxenburg, Austria], Chichester, New York.
18. Hood, L. C. 1998. Frayed safety nets: conservation planning under the Endangered Species Act 1998. Defenders of Wildlife. Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, DC.
19. Jasny, M. 1997. Leap of faith: California's experiment in natural community conservation planning. Natural Resources Defense Council, Los Angeles, CA.
20. Kershaw, M., G. M. Mace, and P. H. Williams. 1995. Threatened status, rarity, and diversity as alternative selection measures for protected areas: a test using Afrotropical antelopes. Conservation Biology 9(2):324-334.
21. Kirkpatrick, J. B. 1983. An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biological Conservation 25:127-134.
22. Landres, P. B., J. Verner, and J. W. Thomas. 1988. Ecological uses of vertebrate indicator species: a critique. Conservation Biology 2:316-328.
23. Lockwood. M., D. G. Bos, and H. Glazebrook. 1997. Integrated protected area selection in Australian biogeographic regions. Environmental Management 21:395-404.
24. Logan, J. R., and H. L. Molotch. 1987. Urban fortunes: the political economy of place. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
25. MacArthur, R. H., and E. O. Wilson. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
26. Mangel, M., and C. Tier. 1994. Four facts every conservation biologist should know about persistence. Ecology 75(3):607-614.
27. Mann, C. C., and M. L. Plummer. 1995. California vs. gnatcatcher. Audubon 97(1):38-54.
28. Margules, C. R., and M. B. Usher. 1981. Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: a review. Biological Conservation 21:79-109.
29. Margules, C. R., A. O. Nicholls, and R. L. Pressey. 1988. Selecting networks of reserves to maximize biological diversity. Biological Conservation 43:63-76.
30. Marsh, L. L., and R. D. Thornton. 1987. San Bruno Mountain habitat conservation plan. Pages 114-139 in D. J. Brower and D. S. Carol (eds.), Managing land-use conflicts. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
31. Mason, M. 1996. Interview: Bruce Babbitt. Natural Resources and Environment (Summer).
32. Moravec, J. 1989. Influences of the individualistic concept of vegetation on syntaxonomy. Vegetatio 81 (1-2):29-40.
33. Morrison, M. L., B. G. Marcot, and R. W. Mannan. 1992. Wildlife-habitat relationships: concepts and applications. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
34. Murphy, D. D., and B. R. Noon. 1991. Coping with uncertainty in wildlife biology. Journal of Wildlife Management 55:773-782.
35. Musick, H. B., and H. D. Grover. 1991. Image textural measurements as indicies of landscape pattern. Pages 77-104 in M. G. Turner and R. H. Gardner (eds.), Quantitative methods in landscape ecology: the analysis and interpretation of landscape heterogeneity. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
36. Noon, B. R., and D. D. Murphy. 1994. Management of the spotted owl: the interaction of science, policy, politics, and litigation. Pages 308-388 in G. K. Meffe and C. R. Carroll (eds.), Principles of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
37. Noss, R. F. 1991. From endangered species to biodiversity. Pages 227-246 in K. A. Kohm (ed.), Balancing on the brink of extinction: the Endangered Species Act and lessons for the future. Island Press, Washington, DC.
38. Noss, R. F., and A. Y. Cooperrider. 1994. Saving nature's legacy: protecting and restoring biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, DC.
39. Noss, R. F., M. A. O'Connell, and D. M. Murphy. 1997. The science of conservation planning: habitat conservation under the Endangered Species Act. Island Press, Washington, DC.
40. O'Leary, J. F., S. A. DiSimone, D. D. Murphy, P. F. Brussard, M. S. Gilpin, R. F. Noss. 1994. Bibliographies on coastal sage scrub and related malacophyllous shrublands of other Mediterranean-type climates. California Department of Fish and Game, San Diego, CA.
41. Orians, G. H. 1993. Endangered at what level? Ecological Applications 3:206-208.
42. Pressey, R. L., and S. L. Tully. 1994. The cost of ad hoc reservation: a case study in western New South Wales. Australian Journal of Ecology 19:375-384.
43. Pressey, R. L., I. R. Johnson, and P. D. Wilson. 1994. Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal. Biodiversity and Conservation 3(3): 242-262.
44. Pulliam, H. R. 1986. Niche expansion and contraction in a variable environment. American Zoology 26:71-79.
45. Pulliam, R. H., and B. Babbitt. 1997. Science and the protection of endangered species. Science 275:499-500.
46. Purdie, R. W., R. Blick, and M. P. Bolton. 1986. Selection of a conservation reserve network in the Mulga biogeographic region of south-western Queensland, Australia. Biological Conservation 38:369-384.
47. Risser, P. G. 1987. Landscape ecology: state of the art. Pages 3-14 in M. G. Turner and D. J. Bogucki (eds.), Landscape heterogeneity and disturbance. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
48. Roberts, L. 1988. Hard choices ahead on biodiversity. Science 241:1759-1761.
49. Rossi, E., and M. Kuitunen. 1996. Ranking of habitats for the assessment of ecological impact in land use planning. Biological Conservation 77(2-3):227-234.
50. Ryti, R. T., and M. E. Gilpin. 1987. The comparative analysis of species occurrence patterns on archipelagos. Oecologia 73(2):282-287.
51. Saetersdal, M., and H. J. B. Birks. 1993. Assessing the representativeness of nature reserves using multivariate analysis: vascular plants and breeding birds in deciduous forests, western Norway. Biological Conservation 65:121-132.
52. Salwasser, H. 1991. In search of an ecosystem approach to endangered species conservation. Pages 247-265 in K. A. Kohm (ed.), Balancing on the brink of extinction. Island Press, Washington DC.
53. Schomberg, R. V. 1993. Science, politics, and morality: scientific uncertainty and decision making. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
54. Schonewald-Cox, C. M., S. M. Chambers, B. Macbryde, and W. L. Thomas. 1983. Genetics and conservation: a reference for managing wild animal and plant populations. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.
55. Scott, J. M., F. Davis, B. Csuti, R. F. Noss, B. Butterfield, C. Groves, H. Anderson, S. Caicco, F. D'Erchia, T. C. Edwards, and others. 1993. Gap analysis: a geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monographs 123:1-41.
56. Scott, T. A., R. Standiford, and N. Pratini. 1995. Private land-owners critical to saving California biodiversity. California Agriculture 49(6):50-54.
57. Silver, D. 1993. New partners, new consensus. Pages 17-20 in J. E. Keeley (ed.), Interface between ecology and land development in California. Southern California Academy of Sciences, Los Angeles, CA.
58. Slobodkin, L. B. 1992. Simplicity and complexity in games of the intellect. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
59. Smallwood K. S., B. Wilcox, R. Leidy, and K. Yarris. 1998. Environmental Auditing: Indicators assessment for Habitat Conservation Plan of Yolo County, California, USA. Environmental Management 22(6): 947-58.
60. Somach, S. L. 1994. What outrages me about the Endangered Species Act. Environmental Law 24(2):801-813.
61. Soule, M. E. 1991. Land use planning and wildlife maintenance: guidelines for conserving in an urban landscape. Journal of ttie American Planning Association 57(3):313-323.
62. Soule, M. E. 1996. An unflinching vision: networks of people defending networks of lands. Pages 1-8 in D. A. Saunders, J. L. Craig, and E. M. Mattiske (eds.), Nature conservation, 4: The role of networks. Surrey Beatty, Chipping Norton, Australia.
63. Soule, M. E., and D. Simberloff. 1986. What do genetics and ecology tell us about the design of nature reserves? Biological Conservation 35:19-40.
64. Terbough, J. W., and B. Winter. 1983. A method for siting parks and reserves with special reference to Columbia and Ecuador. Biological Conservation 27:45-58.
65. Thornton, R. D. 1991. Searching for consensus and predictability: habitat conservation planning under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. Environmental Law 21(605):604-655.
66. Underhill, L. G. 1994. Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithms. Biological Conservation 70(1):85-87.
67. US Department of the Interior. 1990. Handbook for habitat conservation planning and incidental take permit processing. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.
68. Usher, M. B. 1986. Wildlife conservation evaluation. Chapman and Hall, London.
69. Wheeler, D. 1996. Ecosystem management: an organizing principle for land-use planning. Pages 155-172 in H. L. Diamond and P. F. Noonan (eds.), Land use in America. Island Press, Washington, DC.
70. Wiegleb, G. 1989. Explanation and prediction in vegetation science. Vegelatio 83(1-2):17-34.
71. Wilson, E. O. 1998. Biophilia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.