The CSF-flow via the cerebral aqueduct. MR-quantification of CSF-flow in 107 patients without clinical or imaging findings of CSF-flow disturbances;Die hohe des liquorflusses uber dem aquadukt. MR- liquorflussquantifizierung an 107 patienten ohne klinische und bildmorphologische hinweise auf eine liquorzirkulationsstorung

Klinische Neuroradiologie

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 51-67

  Bock, Alexander ^a,d   Geske, Ralf ^b   Schnackenburg, Bernhard ^c  

^a Abteilung Neuroradiologie   (Germany)

^b Klinikum Neubrandenburg   (Germany)

^c PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^d Abteilung Neuroradiologie   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aqueduct; CSF dynamics; MRI; Normal values; Phase contrast; Quantification

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN AQUEDUCT; BRAIN THIRD VENTRICLE; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID FLOW; FLOW MEASUREMENT; HEART CYCLE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; IMAGING; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

EID: 0034042937     PISSN: 09397116     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s000620050003     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bendel P, Buonocore E, Bockisch A, et al. Blood flow in the carotid arteries: quantification by using phase-sensitive MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 1989;152:1307.
2. Borgersen A. Width of the third ventricel. Acta Radiol Diagn 1966;4:645-61.
3. Bradley WG, Quencer RM. Hydrocephalus and cerebrospinal fluid flow. In: Stark DD, Bradley WG, eds: Magnetic resonance imaging, Vol. 3. St. Louis: Mosby, Inc., 1999.
4. Bradley WG, Scalzo D, Queralt J, et al. Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging. Radiol 1996;198:523-9.
5. Citrin CM, Sherman JL, Gangarosa RE, et al. Physiology of the CSF flow-void sign: modification by cardiac gating. AJNR 1986;7:1021-4.
6. Engeset A, Lönnum A. Third ventricels of 12 mm width or more. A preliminary reprot. Acta Radiol 1958;50:5.
7. Enzmann DR. Brain motion. In: Stark DD, Bradley WG, eds. Magnetic resonance imaging, Vol. 3. St. Louis: Mosby, Inc, 1999.
8. Enzmann DR, Pelc NJ. Brain motion: measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging. Radiology 1992;185:653-60.
9. Feinberg DA. Functional magnetic resonance imaging: application to degenerative brain disease and hydrocephalus. Neuroimag Clin North Am 1995;5:125-34.
10. Feinberg DA, Mark AS. Human brain motion and cerebrospinal fluid circulation demonstrated with MR velocity imaging. Radiology 1987;163:793-9.
11. Fisher CM. Binswanger's encephalopathy: a review. J Neurol 1989;236:65-79.
12. Flyger G, Hjelmquist U. Normal variation in the caliber of the human cerebral aqueduct. Anat Rec 1957;127:151-62.
13. Geitz D, Wirestam R, Franck A, et al. Pulsatile brain movement and associated hydrodynamics studied by magnetic resonance phase imaging. The Monro-Kellie doctrine revisited. Neuroradiology 1992;34:370-80.
14. George AE. Chronic communicating hydrocephalus and periventricular white matter disease: a debat with regard to cause and effect. AJNR 1991; 12:42-4.
15. Gideon P, Thomson C, Stahlberg F, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid production and dynamics in normal aging: a MRI phase-mapping study. Acta Neurol Scand 1994;89:362-6.
16. Hakim S. Some observations on CSF pressure. Hydrocephalic syndrome in adults with "normal" CSF pressure. (Thesis No. 957). Bogota, Colombia: Javerinana University School of Medicine.
17. Jacobson EF, Fletcher DF, Morgan MK, et al. Fluid dynamics of the cerebral aqueduct. Pediat Neurosurg 1996;24:229-36.
18. Keck EW. Kardiologie - Neugeborene, Säuglinge, Kinder. München-Wien-Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1989:162.
19. Kim MH, Shin KM, Song JH. Cine MR CSF flow study in hydrocephalus: What are the valuable parameters. Acta Neurochir 1988;71:Suppl:343-6.
20. Krauss JK, Droste DW, Mergner TW. Der idiopathische Normaldruckhydrozephalus. Dtsch Ärztebl 1997;94:A-589-95.
21. Krauss JK, Regel JP, Vach W, et al. Flow void of cerebrospinal fliud in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus of the elderly: can it predict outcome after shunting? Neurosurg 1997;40: 67-73.
22. Levy LM, DiChiro G. MR phase imaging and cerebrospinal fluid flow in the head and spine. Neuroradiology 1990;32: 399-406.
23. Massaryk TJ, Il JP, Dagirmanjian A, et al. Magnetic resonance angiographie: neuroradiological applications. In: Stark DD, Bradley WG, eds: Magnetic resonance imaging, Vol. 3. St. Louis: Mosby Inc, 1999.
24. Naidich TP, Nolan R, Altman NR, et al. Phase contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging: Normal cerebrospinal fluid oscillation and applications to hydrocephalus. Neurosurg Clin North Am 1993;4:677-705.
25. Nitz WR, Bradley WG, Watanabe AS, et al. Flow dynamics of cerebrospinal fluid: assessment with phase-contrast velocity MR imaging performed with retrospective cardiac gating. Radiology 1992;183:395-405.
26. Ohara S, Nagai H, Matsumoto T, et al. MR imaging of CSF pulsatory flow and ist relation to intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 1988;69:675-82.
27. Pettigrew RI, Dannels W, Galloway JR, et al. Quantitative phase-flow MR imaging by using standard sequences: comparison with in vivo flow-meter measurements. Am J Roentgenol 1987;148: 411.
28. Poncelet BP, Wedeen VJ, Weisskoff RM, et al. Brain parenchyma motion: Measurement with cine echoplanar MR imaging. Radiology 1992;185:645-51.
29. Quencer RM, Donovan Post MJ, Hinks RS. Cine MR in the evaluation of normal and abnormal CSF flow: intracranial and intraspinal studies. Neuroradiology 1990;32:371-91.
30. Raybaud C. Neuroradiology of the CSF flow patterns. 3rd Refresher Course of the ESNR. Bruges, 1993.
31. Williams B. Is Aqueduct stenosis a result of hydrocephalus? Brain 1973; 96:399-412.
32. Woollam DH, Millen JW. Anatomical considerations in the pathology of stenosis of cerebral aqueduct. Brain 1953;76:104-12.