A self-validating digital Coriolis mass-flow meter: An overview

Control Engineering Practice

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 487-506

  Henry, M P ^a   Clarke, D W ^a   Archer, N ^a   Bowles, J ^a   Leahy, M J ^b   Liu, R P ^a   Vignos, J ^c   Zhou, F B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK   (Ireland)

^c Invensys Process Systems USA   (United States)

Author keywords

Coriolis mass flow metering; Field programmable gate arrays; Hardware compilation; Intelligent sensors; Non linear control; Sensor validation

Indexed keywords

FLOW CONTROL; SENSORS; TRANSDUCERS;

CORIOLIS MASS FLOWMETER TRANSMITTERS; SECOND-GENERATION SENSOR VALIDATION (SEVA) DEMONSTRATOR;

FLOWMETERS;

CORIOLIS MASS METER; MASS FLOWMETER;

EID: 0034042639     PISSN: 09670661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0967-0661(99)00177-X     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Analog Devices (1998). Details from http://www.analog.com/SHARC/attack.
2. Bergovic M., Djuric P., Dunlap S., Phadke A. Frequency tracking in power networks in the presence of harmonics. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. 8(2):1993;480-486.
3. BSI (1998). Meeting of BSI-DISC AMT7 Committee on Fieldbus and Function Blocks, July 1998.
4. Cascetta F., Cignolo G., Goria R., Martini G., Rivetti A., Vigo P. Experimental intercomparison of Coriolis mass-flowmeters. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control. 14(2):1992;99-107.
5. Cheesewright R., Clark C. The effect of flow pulsations on Coriolis mass-flow meters. Journal of Fluids and Structures. 12:1998;1025-1039.
6. Clarke D.W. Non-linear control of the oscillation amplitude of a Coriolis mass-flow meter. European Journal of Control. 4(3):1998;196-207.
7. Costlow, T. (1998). Smart sensor standard looks for takeoff. EE Times, 10 August, http://ww.etimes.com/story/OEG19981008s0014.
8. Grumski, J.T., & Bajura, R.A. (1984). Performance of a Coriolis type mass-flowmeter in the measuring of two-phase (air-liquid) mixtures. ASME Winter Annual Meeting. New Orleans, USA, vol. 17 (pp. 49-14).
9. Henry M.P. Validating data from smart sensors. Control Engineering. 41(9):1994;63-66.
10. Henry M.P. A self-validating Coriolis meter. Control Engineering. 42(6):1995;81-86.
11. Henry M.P. Fieldbus and sensor validation. IEE Computing and Control Journal. 6(6):1995;263-272.
12. Henry M.P. Keynote paper. Hardware compilation - a new technique for rapid prototyping of digital systems - applied to sensor validation Control Engineering Practice. 3(7):1995;907-924.
13. Henry M.P., Archer N., Atia M.R.A., Bowles J., Clarke D.W., Fraher P.M.A., Page I., Randall G., Yang J.C.-Y. Programmable hardware architectures for sensor validation. Control Engineering Practice. 4(10):1996;1339-1354.
14. Henry M.P., Clarke D.W. The self-validating sensor. Rationale, definitions and examples Control Engineering Practice. 1(4):1993;585-610.
15. Horowitz, P. & Hill, W. (1989). The Art of Electronics (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Page, I (1998). Hardware compilation, configurable platforms and ASICS for self-validating sensors. hhtp://www.comlab.ox.ac.uk/oucl/hwcomp.html.
17. Raszillier H., Durst F. Coriolis-effect in mass-flow metering. Archive of Applied Mechanics. 61:1991;192-214.
18. SIRA (1998). The impact of Fieldbus and sensor fusion on flow measurement. DTI NMS Programme for Flow Measurement, Project OR9A Technical Awareness Studies.
19. Skea A.F., Hall A.R.W. Effects of gas leaks in oil flow on single-phase flow meters. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation. 10(3):1999;145-150.
20. Sultan G., Hemp J. Modelling of the Coriolis mass-flowmeter. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 132(3):1989;473-489.
21. Sultan, G. (1990) Theoretical and experimental studies of the Coriolis mass-flowmeter. Ph.D. thesis, Cranfield University, UK.
22. Texas Instruments (1998). http:/www.ti.com; search for TLC320AD75.