An investigation into the poor performance of a model predictive control system on an industrial CGO coker

Control Engineering Practice

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 619-631

  Huang, Biao ^a   Kadali, Ramesh ^a   Zhao, Xia ^a   Tamayo, Edgar C ^b   Hanafi, Ahmed ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b SYNCRUDE CANADA LTD   (Canada)

Author keywords

Fault diagnosis; Feedback control; Feedforward control; Model predictive control; Performance assessment; Spectral analysis

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; CLOSED LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS; CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; FEEDBACK CONTROL; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS;

MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL (MPC); PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT;

PREDICTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS;

COKE; CONTROL SYSTEM; FAULT DIAGNOSIS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT;

EID: 0034042066     PISSN: 09670661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0967-0661(99)00194-X     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Desborough L., Harris T. Performance assessment measure for univariate feedback control. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 70:1992;1186-1197.
2. Hakvoort R.G., Schrama R.J.P., Van den Hof P.M.J. Approximate identification with closed-loop performance criterion and application to lqg feedback design. Automatica. 30(4):1994;679-690.
3. Harris T. Assessment of closed loop performance. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 67:1989;856-861.
4. Harris T.J., Boudreau F., MacGregor J.F. Performance assessment of multivariable feedback controllers. Automatica. 32(11):1996;1505-1518.
5. Hjalmarsson, H., Gevers, M., Bruyne, F. D., & Leblond, J. (1994). Identification for control: closing the loop gives more accurate controllers. Proceedings of 1994 CDC. Lake Buena Vista, FL (pp. 4150-4155).
6. Huang, B., & Shah, S. L. (1999). Control loop performance assessment: Theory and applications. London: Springer.
7. Huang, B., Shah, S. L., & Kwok, K. Y. (1996). How good is your controller? Application of control loop performance assessment techniques to MIMO processes. Proceedings of the 13th IFAC world congress, vol. M. San Francisco (pp. 229-234).
8. Huang B., Shah S.L., Kwok K.Y. Good, bad or optimal? Performance assessment of MIMO processes. Automatica. 33(6):1997;1175-1183.
9. Kadali, R., Huang, B., & Tamayo, E. C. (1998). A case study on performance analysis and troubling shooting of an industrial model predictive control system. Proceedings of 1999 American control conference (pp. 642-646).
10. Kesavan P., Lee J.H. Diagnostic tools for multivariable model-based control systems. Industrial Engineering and Chemistry Research. 36:1997;2725-2738.
11. Lynch, C. B., & Dumont, G. A. (1993). Closed loop performance monitoring. Proceedings of the second IEEE conference control applications. Vancouver, BC (pp. 835-840).
12. Qin, S. J., & Badgwell, T. A. (1996). An overview of industrial model predictive control technology. Proceedings of CPC-V. Tahoe City, CA (pp. 232-256).
13. Scokaert, P. O. M., & Rawlings, J. B. (1996). On infeasibilities in model predictive control. Proceedings of CPC-V. Tahoe City, CA (pp. 331-334).
14. Zang Z., Bitmead R.R., Gevers M. Iterative weighted least-squares identification and weighted lqg control design. Automatica. 31(11):1995;1577-1594.