Plant regeneration from sugar beet leaf protoplasts: Analysis of shoots by DNA fingerprinting and restriction fragment length polymorphism

Canadian Journal of Botany

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 10-18

  Jazdzewska, E ^a   Sadoch, Z ^a   Niklas, A ^a,b   Majewska Sawka, A ^a  

^a PLANT BREEDING AND ACCLIMATIZATION INSTITUTE NATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

Author keywords

atp6; atpA; Beta vulgaris L.; Protoplasts; Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD); Regeneration

Indexed keywords

6 N BENZYLADENINE; AUXIN; CALLUS CULTURE; CULTURE MEDIUM; CYTOKININ; CYTOPLASMIC MALE STERILITY; DIPLOIDY; DNA FINGERPRINTING; GALLIC ACID PROPYL ESTER; GENOTYPE; MITOSIS; NAPHTHALENEACETIC ACID; PROTOPLAST; PUTRESCINE; REGENERATION; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; SOMACLONAL VARIATION;

BETA VULGARIS; BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. VULGARIS;

EID: 0034040676     PISSN: 00084026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/b99-145     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Akinerdem, F. 1991. Determination of the ploidy level of pure and mixed plant populations of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Plant Breeding, 107: 333-337.
2. Altman, A., Kaur-Sawhney, R., and Galston, A.W. 1977. Stabilization of oat leaf protoplasts through polyamine-mediated inhibition of senescence. Plant Physiol. 60: 570-574.
3. Bhat, S.R., Ford-Lloyd, B.V., and Callow, J.A. 1985. Isolation of protoplasts and regeneration of callus from suspension cultures of cultivated beets. Plant Cell Rep. 4: 348-350.
4. Borrell, A., Carbonell, L., Farras, R., Puig-Parellada, P., and Tiburcio, A.F. 1997. Polyamines inhibit lipid peroxidation in senescing oat leaves. Physiol. Plant. 99: 385-390.
5. Brears, T., Curtis, G.J., and Lonsdale, D.M. 1989. A specific rearrangement of mitochondrial DNA induced by tissue culture. Theor. Appl. Genet. 77: 620-624.
6. Brown, P.T.H., Lange F.D., Kranz, E., and Lörz, H. 1993. Analysis of single protoplasts and regenerated plants by PCR and RAPD technology. Mol. Gen. Genet. 237: 311-317.
7. Chowdhury, M.K.U., Vasil, V., and Vasil, I.K. 1994. Molecular analysis of plants regenerated from embryogenic cultures of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 87: 821-828.
8. Davis, L.G., Dibner, M.D., and Battey, F.J. 1986. Basic methods in molecular biology. Elsevier Sci. Publ. Co., New York.
9. Dellaporta, S.L, Wood, J., and Hicks, J.B. 1983. A plant mini-preparation: version II. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 4: 19-21.
10. Eilers, R.J., Sullivan, J.G., and Skirvin, R.M. 1988. Analyzing the effects of exogenous polyamines and growth regulators on plating efficiency of sweet potato protoplasts using a central composite test design. Plant Cell Rep. 7: 216-219.
11. Frearson, E.M., Power, J.B., and Cocking, E.C. 1973. The isolation, culture and regeneration of Petunia leaf protoplasts. Dev. Biol. 33: 130-137.
12. Galston, A.W. 1983. Polyamines as modulators of plant development. BioScience, 33: 382-388.
13. Hall, R.D., Pedersen, Ch., and Krens, F.A. 1993. Improvement of protoplast culture protocols for Beta vulgaris L. (sugar beet). Plant Cell Rep. 12: 339-342.
14. Hall, R.D., Verhoeven, H.A., and Krens, F.A. 1995. Computer-assisted identification of protoplasts responsible for rare division events reveals guard-cell totipotency. Plant Physiol. 107: 1379-1386.
15. Hall, R.D., Riksen-Bruinsma, T., Weyens, G., Lefèbvre, M., Dunwell, J.M., and Krens, F.A. 1996. Stomatal guard cells are totipotent. Plant Physiol. 112: 889-892.
16. Hall, R.D., Riksen-Bruinsma, T., Weyens, G., Lefèbvre, M., Dunwell, J.M., van Tunen, A., and Krens, F.A. 1997. Sugar beet guard cell protoplasts demonstrate a remarkable capacity for cell division enabling applications in stomatal physiology and molecular breeding. J. Exp. Bot. 48: 255-263.
17. Karp, A. 1995. Somaclonal variation as a tool for crop improvement. Euphytica, 85: 295-302.
18. Kaur-Sawhney, R., Flores, H.E., and Galston, A.W. 1980. Polyamine-induced DNA synthesis and mitosis in oat leaf protoplasts. Plant Physiol. 65: 368-371.
19. Krens, F.A., Jamar, D., Rouwendal, G.J.A., and Hall, R.D. 1990. Transfer of cytoplasm from new Beta CMS sources to sugar beet by asymmetric fusion. 1. Shoot regeneration from mesophyll protoplasts and characterization of regenerated plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 79: 390-396.
20. Lenzner, S., Zoglauer, K., and Schieder, O. 1995. Plant regeneration from protoplasts of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Physiol. Plant. 94: 342-350.
21. Majewska-Sawka, A., Niklas, A., and Jazdzewska, E. 1997. The effect of polyamines on the development of sugar beet protoplasts. Biol. Plant. 39: 561-567.
22. Majewska-Sawka, A., Butowt, R., and Niklas, A. 1998. Do polyamines release membrane-bound calcium in sugar beet protoplasts? J. Plant Physiol. 153: 247-250.
23. Munthali, M.T., Newbury, H.J., and Ford-Lloyd, B.V. 1996. The detection of somaclonal variants of beets using RAPD. Plant Cell Rep. 15: 474-478.
24. Murashige, T., and Skoog, F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473-497.
25. Phillips, R.L., Kaeppler, S.M., and Olhoft, P. 1994. Genetic instability of plant tissue cultures: breakdown of normal controls. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91: 5222-5226.
26. Puite, K.J., and Schaart, J.G. 1993. Nuclear genomic composition of asymmetric fusion products between irradiated transgenic Solanum brevidens and S. tuberosum: limited elimination of donor chromosomes and polyploidization of the recipient genome. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 237-244.
27. Sabir, A., Newbury, H.J., Todd, G., Catty, J., and Ford-Lloyd, B.V. 1992. Determination of genetic stability using isozymes and RFLPs in beet plants regenerated in vitro. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84: 113-117.
28. Sadoch, Z., and Goc, A. 1997. Molecular characterization of fertile and sterile cytoplasms in Beta ssp. Plant Breeding, 116: 409-414.
29. Sadoch, Z., Majewska-Sawka, A., Jażdżewska, E., Niklas, A. 1999. The changes in sugar beet mitochrondrial DNA induced during a callus stage. Plant Breeding, 118. In press.
30. Schlangstedt, M., Hermans, B., Zoglauer, K., and Schieder, O. 1992. Culture of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) protoplasts in alginate - callus formation and root organogenesis. J. Plant Physiol. 140: 339-344.
31. Steen, P., Keimer, B., D'Halluin, K., and Pedersen, H.C. 1986. Variability in plants of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) regenerated from callus, cell-suspension and protoplasts. Genetetic manipulation in plant breeding. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
32. Weigel, R., Wolf, M., and Hesemann, C.U. 1995. Mitochondrial DNA variation in plants regenerated from embryogenic callus cultures of CMS triticale. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91: 1237-1241.
33. Wilson, A.J., and Chourey, P.S. 1984. A rapid inexpensive method for the isolation of restrictable mitochondrial DNA from various plant sources. Plant Cell Rep. 3: 237-239.
34. Xue, Y., Collin, S., Davies, D.R., and Thomas, C.M. 1994. Differential screening of mitochondrial cDNA libraries from male-fertile and cytoplasmic male-sterile sugar-beet reveals genome rearrangements at atp6 and atpA loci. Plant Mol. Biol. 25: 91-103.
35. Yamagishi, M., Otani, M., and Shimada, T. 1996. A comparison of somaclonal variation in rice plants derived and not derived from protoplasts. Plant Breeding, 115: 289-294.