Taxon names are not defined

Taxon

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 231-233

  Stuessy, Tod F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034037936     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1223837     Document Type: Short Survey

References (27)

1. Brummitt, R. K. 1997. Taxonomy versus cladonomy, a fundamental controversy in biological systematics. Taxon 46: 723-734.
2. Bryant, H. N. 1994. Comments on the phylogenetic definition of taxon names and conventions regarding the naming of crown clades. Syst. Biol. 43: 124-130.
3. _ 1996. Explicitness, stability, and universality in the phylogenetic definition and usage of taxon names: a case study of the phylogenetic taxonomy of the Carnivora (Mammalia). Svst. Biol. 45: 174-189.
4. Cantino, P. D. 1998. Binomials, hyphenated uninomials, and phylogenetic nomenclature. Taxon 47: 425-429.
5. _ 2000. Phylogenetic nomenclature: addressing some concerns. Taxon 49: 85-93.
6. _ , Bryant, H. N., de Queiroz, K., Donoghue, M. J., Eriksson, T., Hissis, B. M. & Lee, M. S. Y. 1999. Species names in phylogenetic nomenclature. Syst. Biol. 48: 790-807.
7. _ , Olmstead, R. G. & Wagstaff, S. J. 1997. A comparison of phylogenetic nomenclature with the current system: a botanical case study. Syst. Biol. 46: 313-331.
8. Carpenter, K. E. 1993. Optimal cladistic and quantitative evolutionary classification as illustrated by fusilier fishes (Teleoslei: Caesionideae). Syst. Biol. 42: 142-154.
9. Claridge, M. F., Dawah, H. A. & Wilson, M. R. (eds.). 1997. Species: the units of biodiversity. London.
10. de Queiroz, K. 1992. Phylogenetic definitions and taxonomic philosophy. Biol. and Philos. 7: 295-313.
11. _ 1997. The Linnaean hierarchy and the evolutionization of taxonomy, with emphasis on the problem of nomenclature. Aliso 15: 125-144.
12. _ & Gauthier, J. 1990. Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: phylogenetic definitions of taxon names. Syst. Zool. 39: 307-322.
13. _ & _ 1992. Phylogenetic taxonomy. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 449-480.
14. _ & _ 1994. Toward a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 27-31.
15. Greuter, W., Barrie, F. R., Burdet, H. M., Chaloner, W. G., Demoulin, V., Hawksworth, D. L., Jorgensen, P. M., Nicolson, D. H., Silva, P. C., Trehane, P. & McNeill, J. 1994. International code of botanical nomenclature (Tokyo Code). Regnum Veg. 131: 1-389.
16. Johnson, L. A. & Porter, J. M. 1998. Serving two masters: applying principles of phylogenetic nomenclature under constraints imposed by the ICBN. Amer. J. Bot. 85 (6, suppl.): 138. Abstr.
17. Knox, E. B. 1998. The use of hierarchies as organizational models in systematics. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 63: 1-49.
18. Kron, K. A. 1997. Exploring alternative systems of classification. Aliso 15: 105-112.
19. Lee, M. S. Y. 1999. Reference taxa and phylogenetic nomenclature. Taxon 48: 31-34.
20. Linnaeus, C. 1737. Critica botanica. Leiden. [English translation by A. Hort. 1938. Ray Society, London.]
21. Moore, G. 1998. A comparison of traditional and phylogenetic nomenclature. Taxon 47: 561-579.
22. Stuessy, T. F. 1987. Explicit approaches for evolutionary classification. Syst. Bot. 12: 251-262.
23. _ 1990. Plant taxonomy: the systematic evaluation of comparative data. New York.
24. _ 1997. Classification: more than just branching patterns of evolution. Aliso 15: 113-124.
25. Sundberg, P. & Pleijel, F. 1994. Phylogenetic classification and the definition of taxon names. Zool. Scripta 23: 19-25.
26. Wilson, R. A. (ed.). 1999. Species: new interdisciplinary essays. Cambridge.
27. Wyss, A. R. & Meng, J. 1996. Application of phylogenetic taxonomy to poorly resolved crown clades. A stem-modified node-based definition of Rodentia. Syst. Biol. 45: 559-568.